Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of benefits of nasal septal surgery on nasal symptoms and general health

  • Main Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of the study was to analyze the patient’s satisfaction following nasal septal surgery based on their subjective opinion and to study whether the SNOT-22 can be used as a reliable outcome measure for successful septal surgery.

Study design

Between Oct 2005–July 2007, sixty consecutive adult patients who underwent nasal septal surgery and met the study criterion were enrolled. The patients were asked to fill in the SNOT-22 questionnaire both prior to and at regular follow up periods after the surgery.

Results

The mean total preoperative SNOT score (of all 22 items) was 20.67 and the mean total postoperative SNOT-22 score was 10.48 (t = 8.8135, p < 0.001 highly significant). On further analysis, improvement was seen in subcategories of Nasal Symptoms (t = 8.0825, p < 0.001 highly significant), Non Nasal Symptoms (t = 3.0913, p < 0.0025 significant), General health symptoms (t = 4.8602, p < 0.001 highly significant) and Nasal Obstruction (t = 7.7652, p < 0.001 highly significant).

Conclusion

The SNOT-22 score is a useful and reliable tool in nasal septal surgery in that it combines both nasal specific and quality of life related questions, which can be assessed individually and together both pre and post operatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sipila J and Suonjaa J (1997) A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 254:387–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shermen L and Hamburg R (1997) Preoperative and postoperative nasal septal surgery assessment with acoustic rhinometry. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 117:338–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reber M, Rahm F, Monnier P (1998) The role of acoustic rhinometry in the pre and postoperative evaluation of results for nasal obstruction. Rhinology 36(4):184–187

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arunachalam PS, Kitcher E, Gray J, Wilson JA (2001) Nasal septal surgery: Evaluation of symptomatic and general health outcomes. Clinical Otolaryngology 26:367–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson FR, Murphy MP, Weymuller ER (1999) Clinimetric evaluation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 14:702–707

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buckland JR, Thomas S, Harries PG (2003) Can the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) be used as a reliable outcome measure for successful septal surgery? Clinical Otolaryngology 28:43–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinis PB and Haider H (2002) Septoplasty: Long term evaluation of results. American Journal of Otolaryngology 23(2):85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Witsell DL, Yueh B, Hannley MT et al. (2004) Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: Results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) Study. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 130:283–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning G (1996) Measuring patient benefits from Otolaryngological surgery and therapy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 105:415–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Denholm SW, Sim DW, Sanderson RJ (1993) Otolaryngological indicator operations: One year’s experience. Journal of Royal College of Surgeons (Edinburgh) 38(1):1–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Samad I, Stevens HE, Maloney A (1992) The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. Journal of Otolaryngology 21(2):88–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haraldson PO, Nordemar H, Anggard A (1987) Long term results after septal surgery. Submucous resection versus septoplasty. Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and its Related Specialities 49:218–222

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matthias F, Rasp Gerd, Kastenbaurer Ernst (2003) Health-related quality of life in Rhino Surgery. American Journal of Otolaryngology 24:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jesses M, Ivaesson A, Malm L (1989) Nasal airway resistance and symptoms after functional septoplasty: comparison of findings at 9 months and 9 years. Clinical Otolaryngology 14:231–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bohlin L and Dahlqvist A (1994) Nasal airway, resistance and complications following functional septoplasty: a ten year follow-up study. Rhinology 32(4):195–197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wai-Kuen HO, Anthony P, Yuen W, Tang Kwong-Chi, William I, Paul K, Lam Y (2004) Time course in the relief of nasal blockage after septal and turbinate surgery. Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 130:324–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pannu, K.K., Chadha, S. & Kaur, I.p. Evaluation of benefits of nasal septal surgery on nasal symptoms and general health. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 61, 59–65 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-009-0036-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-009-0036-2

Keywords

Navigation