Skip to main content
Log in

A new approach based on exponential entropy with modified kernel fuzzy c-means clustering for MRI brain segmentation

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Image clustering is one of the most important and challenging process of digital image processing and computer vision; refers to partitioning an image into meaningful regions. In medical imaging, the segmentation of anatomical magnetic resonance images (MRI) is a crucial step to a multitude of applications, including computer-aided diagnosis, monitoring of cancerous pathologies, morphometric analysis and visualization of human tissues. Unfortunately, MR images contain intensity inhomogeneity and noise produced by the scanning tool can lead to inaccurate and unreliable results segmentation. In this context, we proposed a robust and efficient fuzzy clustering method called Modified Kernel with Exponential Entropy: MK2E which is introduced by modifying the kernel fuzzy c-means method and by incorporating the fuzzy exponential entropy and a logarithmic penalty term. Moreover, we have examined an important theoretical question regarding the mathematical properties behind our fuzzy MK2E clustering algorithm such as convergence. Experiments were performed on normal brain images from T1-weighted MRI scans with varying noise levels and intensity inhomogeneity. The results illustrate the superiority of our proposed method over other six compared methods in terms of accuracy segmentation and execution time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed MN, Yamany SM, Mohamed N, Farag A, Moriarty T (2002) A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imag 21(3):193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balafar M, Ramli A, Mashohor S (2011) Brain Magnetic resonance image segmentation using novel improvement for expectation maximizing. Neurosciences 16:242–247

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdek JC (1974) Cluster validity with fuzzy sets. J Cybern 3(3):58–72

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaira T (2011) A novel intuitionistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm and its application to medical images. Appl Soft comput 11:1711–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen S, Zhang D (2004) Robust image segmentation using FCM with spatial constraints based on new kernel-induced distance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B: Cybern 34(4):1907–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cocosco CA, Kollokian V, Kwan RKS, Pike GB, Evans AC "Brainweb: Online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database in NeuroImage

  7. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from in-complete data via the Em algorithm. J Royal Statist Soc: Ser B 39(1):1–38

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dice L (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 23(3):297–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gimiami M (2002) Mercer kernel-based clustering in feature space. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(3):780–784

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gosain A, Dahiya S (2016) Performance analysis of various fuzzy Clustering Algorithms. A Review 7th International Conference on Communication. Computing and Virtualization, 79: 100–111

  11. Halder A, Kole DK (2012) Automatic brain tumor detection and isolation of tumor cells from MRI images. Int J Comput Appl 39:26–30

    Google Scholar 

  12. Halder A, Talukdar NA (2019) Brain tissue segmentation using improved kernelized rough-fuzzy C-means with spatio-contextual information from MRI. Magn Reson Imag 62:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hathaway RJ, Davenport JW, Bezdek JC (1989) Relational duals of the c-means clustering algorithms. Pattern Recognit 22(2):205–212

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain AK, Murty MN, Flynn PJ (1999) Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput Surv 31(3):264–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khalilia MA et al (2014) Improvements to the relational fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recogn. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2014.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kouhi A, Seyedarabi H, Aghagolzadeh A (2019) Robust FCM clustering algorithm with combined spatial constraint and membership matrix local information for brain MRI segmentation. Expert Syst Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krishnapuram R, Keller J (1993) A possibilistic approach to clustering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1(2):98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kubat M, Stephen S (1997). Addressing the curse of imbalanced training set: One-sides selection. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on machine learning, pp.179–186, Morgan Kaufmann

  19. Kumar SVA, Harish BS (2017) A modified intuitionistic fuzzy clustering algorithm for medical image segmentation. J. Intell. Syst

  20. Mekhmoukh A, Mokrani K (2018) MR brain image segmentation using an improved kernel fuzzy local information C-means based wavelet, particle swarm optimization (PSO) initialization and outlier rejection with level set methods. Int Arab J Inform Technol 15(4):683–692

    Google Scholar 

  21. Niessen WJ, Bouma CJ, Vincken KL, Viergever MA (2000) Error metrics for quantitative evaluation of medical image segmentation. In Klette R, Stiehl HS, Viergever MA, Vincken KL (eds) Perform Char Comput Vis, Computational Imaging and Vision, Dordrecht

  22. Pal NR, Pal K, Keller J, Bezdek JC (2005) A possibilistic fuzzy c- means clustering algorithm. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13(4):517–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramathilagam S, Pandiyarajan R, Sathya A, Devic R, Kannan SR (2011) Modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for segmentation of T1–T2-weighted brain MRI. J Comput Appl Math 235:1578–1586

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Soni AK, Kaur P, Gosain A (2013) A robust kernelized intuitionistic fuzzy cmeans clustering algorithm in segmentation of noisy medical images. Pattern Recogn Lett 34(2):163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao F, Jiao L, Liu H (2013) Kernel generalized fuzzy c-means clustering with spatial information for image segmentation. Digit Signal Process 23:184–199

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaimae Ouchicha.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ouchicha, C., Ammor, O. & Meknassi, M. A new approach based on exponential entropy with modified kernel fuzzy c-means clustering for MRI brain segmentation. Evol. Intel. 16, 651–665 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00689-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00689-5

Keywords

Navigation