Estimation of species extinction: what are the consequences when total species number is unknown?
The species–area relationship (SAR) is known to overestimate species extinction but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear to a great extent. Here, I show that when total species number in an area is unknown, the SAR model exaggerates the estimation of species extinction. It is proposed that to accurately estimate species extinction caused by habitat destruction, one of the principal prerequisites is to accurately total the species numbers presented in the whole study area. One can better evaluate and compare alternative theoretical SAR models on the accurate estimation of species loss only when the exact total species number for the whole area is clear. This presents an opportunity for ecologists to simulate more research on accurately estimating Whittaker’s gamma diversity for the purpose of better predicting species loss.
KeywordsDiversity partitioning Species–area curve Power-law models Biodiversity conservation Biodiversity crisis
- Chen Y (2013b) The biases of utilizing species’ range maps to identify priority areas for conservation. Econ J 4:21–30Google Scholar
- May R, Lawton J, Stork N (1995) Assessing extinction rates. In: Lawton J, May R (eds) Extinction rates. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–24Google Scholar
- Triantis K, Borges PAV, Ladle R, Hortal J, Cardoso P, Gaspar C, Dinis F, Mendonca E, Silveira L, Gabriel R, Melo C, Santos A (2010) Extinction debt on oceanic islands. Ecography 33:285–294Google Scholar