Abstract
Alfred Russel Wallace (1823–1913) and Charles Darwin (1809–1882) are honored as the founders of modern evolutionary biology. Accordingly, much attention has focused on their relationship, from their independent development of the principle of natural selection to the receipt by Darwin of Wallace’s essay from Ternate in the spring of 1858, and the subsequent reading of the Wallace and Darwin papers at the Linnean Society on 1 July 1858. In the events of 1858 Wallace and Darwin are typically seen as central players, with Darwin’s friends Charles Lyell (1797–1875) and Joseph Dalton Hooker (1817–1911) playing supporting roles. This narrative has resulted in an under-appreciation of a more central role for Charles Lyell as both Wallace’s inspiration and foil. The extensive anti-transmutation arguments in Lyell’s landmark Principles of Geology were taken as the definitive statement on the subject. Wallace, in his quest to solve the mystery of species origins, engaged with Lyell’s arguments in his private field notebooks in a way that is concordant with his engagement with Lyell in the 1855 and 1858 papers. I show that Lyell was the object of Wallace’s Sarawak Law and Ternate papers through a consideration of the circumstances that led Wallace to send his Ternate paper to Darwin, together with an analysis of the material that Wallace drew upon from the Principles. In this view Darwin was, ironically, intended for a supporting role in mediating Wallace’s attempted dialog with Lyell.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartholomew M (1973) Lyell and evolution: an account of Lyell’s response to the prospect of an evolutionary ancestry for man. Brit J Hist Sci 6:261–303
Beccaloni GW (2008) Wallace’s annotated copy of the of the Darwin-Wallace paper on natural selection. In: Smith CH, Beccaloni G (eds) Natural selection and beyond: the intellectual legacy of Alfred Russel Wallace. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 91–101
Beddall BG (1972) Wallace, Darwin, and Edward Blyth: further notes on the development of evolution theory. J Hist Biol 5:153–158
Beddall BG (1988) Darwin and divergence: the Wallace connection. J Hist Biol 21:1–68
Blyth E (1835) An attempt to classify the “varieties” of animals, with observations on the marked seasonal and other changes which naturally take place in various British species, and which do not constitute varieties. Mag Nat Hist 8:40–53
Brandon-Jones C (1997) Edward Blyth, Charles Darwin, and the animal trade in nineteenth-century India and Britain. J Hist Biol 30:145–178
Brooks JL (1984) Just Before the Origin: Alfred Russel Wallace's theory of evolution. Columbia University Press, New York
Chambers R (1844) Vestiges of the natural history of creation. John Churchill, London [Facsimile reprint: Secord J (ed) (1995) Vestiges of the natural history of creation and other evolutionary writings. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London]
Corsi P (1978) The importance of French transformist ideas for the second volume of Lyell’s Principles of Geology. Brit J Hist Sci 2:1–2
Costa JT (2013) On the organic law of change: an annotated transcription of Alfred Russel Wallace’s species notebook, 1855–1859. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (in press)
DCP (2013) Secord J et al (eds) [Darwin Correspondence Project]. http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/. Accessed April 2013
Davies R (2012) How Charles Darwin received Wallace’s Ternate paper 15 days earlier than he claimed: a comment on van Wyhe and Rookmaaker (2012). Biol J Linn Soc 105:472–477
de Beer G (ed) (1959) ‘Darwin’s Journal.’ Bull Brit Mus (Nat Hist), Hist Series 2:1–21
de Candolle AP (1820) Géographie botanique. In: Cuvier G (ed) Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles. Paris, 18:359–422
Fichman M (2004) An elusive victorian: the evolution of Alfred Russel Wallace. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hallam A (1998) Lyell’s views on organic progression, evolution and extinction. In: Blundell DJ, Scott AC (eds) Lyell: the past is the key to the present, vol 143. Geological Society Special Publication, London, pp 133–136
Kutschera U (2003) A comparative analysis of the Darwin-Wallace papers and the development of the concept of natural selection. Theory Biosci 122:343–359
Lamarck J-B (1809) Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des considérations relatives à l’histoire naturelle des animaux [...]. Paris
Lyell C (1830–1833) Principles of geology, vol I–III. John Murray, London
Lyell C (1835) Principles of geology, vol I–IV, 4th edn. John Murray, London
Malthus TR (1798) First essay on population. J. Johnson, London
McKinney HL (1972) Wallace and natural selection. Yale University Press, New Haven
Moore J (1997) Wallace’s Malthusian moment: the common context revisited. In: Lightman B (ed) Victorian science in context. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 290–311
Osborn HF (1928) Impressions of great naturalists. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York
Porter D (2012) Why did Wallace write to Darwin? Linnean 28:17–25
Recker D (1990) There’s more than one way to recognize a Darwinian: Lyell’s Darwinism. Phil Sci 57:459–478
Rudwick MJS (1970) The strategy of Lyell’s Principles of Geology. Isis 61:5–33
Rudwick MJS (1972) The meaning of fossils: episodes in the history of palaeontology. MacDonald & American Elsevier Inc., London
Rudwick MJS (1998) Lyell and the Principles of Geology. In: Blundell DJ, Scott AC (eds) Lyell: the past is the key to the present, vol 143. Geological Society Special Publication, London, pp 3–15
Rudwick MJS (2005) Bursting the limits of time: the reconstruction of geohistory in the age of revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rudwick MJS (2008) Worlds before Adam: the reconstruction of geohistory in the age of reform. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Slotten RA (2004) The heretic in Darwin’s court: the life of Alfred Russel Wallace. Columbia University Press, New York
Smith CH (2013) A further look at the 1858 Wallace-Darwin mail delivery question. Biol J Linn Soc 108:715–718
Stevenson B (2009) Samuel Stevens, naturalist (1817–1899). Micscape Mag. no. 166 (http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/indexmag.html)
Van Wyhe J, Rookmaaker K (2012) A new theory to explain the receipt of Wallace’s Ternate essay by Darwin in 1858. Biol J Linn Soc 105:249–252
Wallace AR (1852) Letter concerning the ship fire dated 19 Oct. 1852. Zoologist 10:3641–3643
Wallace AR (1855) On the law which has regulated the introduction of new species. Annals Mag Nat Hist 16(2nd series):184–196
Wallace AR (1858a) On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinitely from the original type. Proc Linn Soc 3:53–62
Wallace AR (1858b) Note on the theory of permanent and geographical varieties. Zoologist 16:5887–5888
Wallace AR (1869) The Malay archipelago; the land of the orang-utan and the bird of paradise. Harper & Brothers, New York
Wallace AR (1905) My life: a record of events and opinions, vol 2. Chapman & Hall, London
Wallace AR (1909) Note on the passages of Malthus’s ‘Principles of Population’ which suggested the idea of natural selection to Darwin and myself. The Darwin-Wallace Celebration Held on Thursday, 1st July 1908, by the Linnean Society of London. Longmans Green & Co., London
WCP (2013) Beccaloni GW (ed) Wallace letters online [Wallace Correspondence Project]. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/wallacelettersonline. Accessed 12 April 2013
Wilson LG (1970) Sir Charles Lyell’s scientific journals on the species question. Yale University Press, New Haven
Wilson LG (1973) Charles Lyell. In: Gillispie CC (ed) Dictionary of scientific biography, vol VIII. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York
Acknowledgments
I thank the Guest Editor, U. Kutschera, for his kind invitation to contribute to the Theory in Biosciences special issue dedicated to Alfred Russel Wallace. This paper was written while a 2012–2013 Fellow of the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin; I gratefully acknowledge the support of the Wissenschaftskolleg and Western Carolina University’s Scholarly Leave program in making my stay in Berlin possible, and I thank the Wissenschaftskolleg’s librarians Sonja Grund, Anja Brockmann, Marianne Buck, and Kirsten Graupner for their considerable assistance. I have benefitted greatly from my many enjoyable discussions concerning Wallace with Andrew Berry and George Beccaloni. Many thanks, finally, to Leslie Costa for helpful comments and criticisms on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is a contribution to the Special Issue Alfred Russel Wallace (1823–1913): the man in the shadow of Charles Darwin–Guest Editors U. Kutschera, U. Hossfeld.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costa, J.T. Engaging with Lyell: Alfred Russel Wallace’s Sarawak Law and Ternate papers as reactions to Charles Lyell’s Principles of Geology . Theory Biosci. 132, 225–237 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-013-0188-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-013-0188-1