Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

In pursuit of increasing supply chain innovation performance through suppliers’ promotive voice: the moderating role of unlearning and transparency

  • Published:
Operations Management Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today’s dynamic business environment, leveraging innovative supply chain (SC) solutions is critical for increasing competitive advantage. While numerous studies have considered the potential of SC innovation (SCI) in the face of growing new problems and challenges, not much is known about the effect of suppliers’ promotive voice behavior (PVB) in this process. This study extends the current research on SCI by investigating the underlying mechanisms by which firms exploit the suggestions and ideas they gain from SC interactions. Building on the relational view (RV) we develop hypotheses that identify the effect of suppliers’ PVB as an important mediator in the relationship between incentives and SCI. Further, we suggest that incentives and two contextual factors (i.e., unlearning reputation and transparency) interact to predict SCI through suppliers’ PVB. For the purpose of testing the proposed hypothesis a survey was administrated to managers involved in SC relationships. The analysis provides the evidence that suppliers’ PVB has a positive influence on SCI. In addition, the association between incentives and SCI was empirically demonstrated to be mediated by suppliers’ PVB. Furthermore, it was determined that incentive’s effect on SCI through suppliers’ PVB was conditional such that unlearning reputation’s effect depended on transparency. In this regard, this study extends the discussion of factors that influence SCI and provides some theoretical and managerial contributions by examining the interplay between incentives, transparency, and unlearning reputation on the suppliers’ PVB and SCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Afraz MF, Bhatti SH, Ferraris A, Couturier J (2021) The impact of supply chain innovation on competitive advantage in the construction industry: Evidence from a moderated multi-mediation model. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgün AE, Byrne JC, Lynn GS, Keskin H (2007a) New product development in turbulent environments: Impact of improvisation and unlearning on new product performance. J Eng Technol Manag - JET-M 24(3)

  • Akgün AE, Byrne JC, Lynn GS, Keskin H (2007b) Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations. J Organization Change Manag 20(6)

  • Akgün AE, Lynn GS, Byrne JC (2006) Antecedents and consequences of unlearning in new product development teams. In J Prod Innov Manag 23(1)

  • Anderson BS, Eshima Y (2013) The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. J Bus Ventur 28(3):413–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias-Pérez J, Huynh T (2023) Flipping the odds of AI-driven open innovation: The effectiveness of partner trustworthiness in counteracting interorganizational knowledge hiding. Ind Mark Manage 111:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlbjørn JS, de Haas H, Munksgaard KB (2011) Exploring Supply Chain Innovation Logistics Research 3:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadegan A, Dooley KJ, Carter PL, Carter JR (2008) Supplier innovativeness and the role of interorganizational learning in enhancing manufacturer capabilities. J Supply Chain Manag 44(4)

  • Belhadi A, Mani V, Kamble SS, Khan SAR, Verma S (2021) Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation. Ann Opera Res 1–26

  • Bhaskaran SR, Krishnan V (2009) Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development on JSTOR. Manage Sci 55(7):1152–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd BK, Bergh DD, Ketchen DJ (2010) Reconsidering the reputation-performance relationship: A resource-based view. J Manag 36(3)

  • Casillas JC, Acedo FJ, Barbero JL (2010) Learning, unlearning and internationalisation: Evidence from the pre-export phase. Int J Inform Manag 30(2)

  • Cegarra-Navarro JG, Sánchez-Vidal ME, Cegarra-Leiva D (2011) Balancing exploration and exploitation of knowledge through an unlearning context: An empirical investigation in SMEs. Manag Decision 49(7)

  • Chakraborty S (2018) Enablers of co-creation in hospital-supplier relationships: empirical study in Indian healthcare context. Supply Chain Forum 19(4)

  • Chang J (2017) The effects of buyer-supplier’s collaboration on knowledge and product innovation. Ind Mark Manage 65:129–143

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CJ (2019) Developing a model for supply chain agility and innovativeness to enhance firms’ competitive advantage. Manag Decis 57(7):1511–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2006) Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. In H Chesbrough, W Vanhaverbeke and J West (Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm (1st ed., Issue 4, pp. 1–392). Oxford University Press

  • Cho B, Ryoo SY, Kim KK (2017) Interorganizational dependence, information transparency in interorganizational information systems, and supply chain performance. Eur J Inform Syst 26(2)

  • Chou SY, Barron K (2016) Employee voice behavior revisited: its forms and antecedents. Manag Res Rev 39(12):1720–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook M, Hagey R (2003) Why companies flunk supply-chain 101: only 33 percent correctly measure supply-chain performance; few use the right incentives. J Bus Strateg 24(4):35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSCMP (2021) SCI Award. CSCMP Supply Chain Innovation Award. https://cscmp.org/CSCMP/Awards/Supply_Chain_Innovation_Award.aspx

  • Dekker HC (2004) Control of inter-organizational relationships: Evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Account Org Soc 29(1)

  • Dovbischuk I (2022) Innovation-oriented dynamic capabilities of logistics service providers, dynamic resilience and firm performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Logist Manag 0957–4093

  • Duarte S, Cruz-Machado V (2019) Green and lean supply-chain transformation: a roadmap. Prod Plan Control 30(14)

  • Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Manag J 21(3):345–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::AID-SMJ96>3.0.CO;2-N

  • Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A, Helm S (2003) Exploring the impact of relationship transparency on business relationships a cross-sectional study among purchasing managers in Germany. Indust Market Manag 32(2)

  • Ersoy P, Börühan G, Kumar Mangla S, Hormazabal JH, Kazancoglu Y, Lafcı Ç (2022) Impact of information technology and knowledge sharing on circular food supply chains for green business growth. BusStrategy Environ 31(5)

  • Feldmann M, Müller S (2003) An incentive scheme for true information providing in Supply Chains. Omega 31(2)

  • Feng Y, Lai K, Zhu Q (2022) Green supply chain innovation: Emergence, adoption, and challenges. Int J Prod Econ 248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdows K, Lee HL, Zhao X (2022) How to Turn a Supply Chain Platform into an Innovation Engine. Harvard Bus Rev. https://hbr.org/2022/07/how-to-turn-a-supply-chain-platform-into-an-innovation-engine

  • Flint DJ, Larsson E, Gammelgaard B (2008) Exploring processes for customer value insights, supply chain learning and innovation: An international study. J Bus Logist 29(1)

  • Ford Report (2018) Ford report. Ford Otosan Sustainability Report 2018. https://www.fordotosan.com.tr/E-BOOK/FORD_SRDE_2018/44/

  • Gao D, Xu Z, Ruan YZ, Lu H (2017) From a systematic literature review to integrated definition for sustainable supply chain innovation (SSCI). J Clean Prod 142:1518–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner TA, Benzie M, Börner J, Dawkins E, Fick S, Garrett R, Godar J, Grimard A, Lake S, Larsen RK, Mardas N, McDermott CL, Meyfroidt P, Osbeck M, Persson M, Sembres T, Suavet C, Strassburg B, Trevisan A, Wolvekamp P (2019) Transparency and sustainability in global commodity supply chains. World Develop 121

  • Gloet M, Samson D (2022) Knowledge and Innovation Management to Support Supply Chain Innovation and Sustainability Practices. Inf Syst Manag 39(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Lu W, Hao L, Gao X (2021) Interdependence and Information Exchange Between Conflicting Parties: The Role of Interorganizational Trust. IEEE Transact Eng Manag 1–17

  • Guzman FA, Espejo A (2019) Introducing changes at work: How voice behavior relates to management innovation. J Organ Behav 40(1):73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (1991) Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances. Strategic Manag J 12:83–103. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486643#metadata_info_tab_contents

  • Harkness JA (2010) Guidelines for best practice in cross-cultural surveys. In Survey Research Center. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. http://www.ccsg.isr.umich.edu/

  • Harkness JA, van de Vijver FJR, Mohler P (2003) Cross-cultural survey methods. J Wiley

  • Hartley JL, Greer BM, Park S (2002) Chrysler leverages its suppliers improvement suggestions. Interfaces 32(4):20–27

  • Hayes AF (2018) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, 2nd edn. Guilford Press

  • Herczeg G, Akkerman R, Hauschild MZ (2018) Supply chain collaboration in industrial symbiosis networks. J Clean Prod 171:1058–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho HD, Ganesan S (2013) Does Knowledge Base Compatibility Help or Hurt Knowledge Sharing between Suppliers in Coopetition? the Role of Customer Participation. J Mark 77(6):91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoejmose SU, Roehrich JK, Grosvold J (2014) Is doing more doing better? The relationship between responsible supply chain management and corporate reputation. Ind Mark Manage 43(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hultman J, Axelsson B (2007) Towards a typology of transparency for marketing management research. Ind Mark Manage 36(5):627–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunold M, Shekhar S (2021) Supply Chain Innovations and Partial Ownership. Rev Indust Org 60(1):109–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im G, Rai A, Lambert LS (2019) Governance and Resource-Sharing Ambidexterity for Generating Relationship Benefits in Supply Chain Collaborations. Decis Sci 50(4):656–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal G, Ha-Brookshire JE (2020) The effect of buyers’ power on suppliers’ motivations in managing their compliance mechanisms: a study of Indian apparel export firms. J Fashion Market Manag 24(2)

  • Johne D, Wallenburg CM (2021) The role of buyer and supplier knowledge stocks for supplier-led improvements in logistics outsourcing. J Purch Supply Manag 27(5)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkanci B, Rahmani M, Toktay LB (2019) The Role of Inclusive Innovation in Promoting Social Sustainability. Prod Oper Manag 28(12):2960–2982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamalaldin A, Linde L, Sjödin D, Parida V (2020) Transforming provider-customer relationships in digital servitization: A relational view on digitalization. Indust Market Manag 89

  • Kenco report (2020) 2020 Supply chain innovation survey. State of Supply Chain Innovation. https://go.kencogroup.com/2020-state-of-supply-chain-innovation

  • Khraishi A, Huq F, Paulraj A (2020) Offshoring innovation: An empirical investigation of dyadic complementarity within SMEs. J Bus Res 118:86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan R, Yen P, Agarwal R, Arshinder K, Bajada C (2021) Collaborative innovation and sustainability in the food supply chain- evidence from farmer producer organisations. Resour Conserv Recycl 168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Raut RD, Priyadarshinee P, Mangla SK, Awan U, Narkhede BE (2022) The Impact of IoT on the Performance of Vaccine Supply Chain Distribution in the COVID-19 Context. IEEE Transact Eng Manag 1–11

  • Kwak DW, Seo YJ, Mason R (2018) Investigating the relationship between supply chain innovation, risk management capabilities and competitive advantage in global supply chains. Int J Oper Prod Manag 38(1):2–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon I-WG, Suh T (2004) Factors affecting the level of trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. J Supply Chain Manag 40:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2004.tb00165.x

  • LaBahn DW, Krapfel R (2000) Early Supplier Involvement in Customer New Product Development. J Bus Res 47(3):173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamming R, Caldwell N, Harrison D (2004) Developing the concept of transparency for use in supply relationships. British J Manag 15(4)

  • Larsson R, Bengtsson L, Henriksson K, Sparks J (1998) The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge Development in Strategic Alliances. Organ Sci 9(3):285–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Rodríguez AL, Eldridge S, Roldán JL, Leal-Millán AG, Ortega-Gutiérrez J (2015) Organizational unlearning, innovation outcomes, and performance: The moderating effect of firm size. J Bus Res 68(4)

  • Li L, Jiang F, Pei Y, Jiang N (2017) Entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance success: The contingency role of relational factors. J Bus Res 72:46–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive Voice: A two-wave examination. Acad Manag J 55(1):71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Shu R, Farh CIC (2019) Differential implications of team member promotive and prohibitive voice on innovation performance in research and development project teams: A dialectic perspective. J Organ Behav 40(1):91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin HF (2017) Antecedents and consequences of electronic supply chain management diffusion: the moderating effect of knowledge sharing. Int J Logist Manag 28(2):699–718. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2016-0023

  • Linder C (2019) Learning from suppliers: a framework for operation innovation in small and medium sized enterprises. Prod Plan Control 30(10–12):827–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CLE, Ghauri PN, Sinkovics RR (2010) Understanding the impact of relational capital and organizational learning on alliance outcomes. J World Bus 45(3)

  • Liu W, Wei S, Li KW, Long S (2022) Supplier participation in digital transformation of a two-echelon supply chain: Monetary and symbolic incentives. Transportation Research Part e: Logistics and Transportation Review 161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu C, Yang J, Zhang F, Teo TSH, Guo W (2020) Antecedents and consequence of organizational unlearning: Evidence from China. Ind Mark Manage 84:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon JF (2002) Corporate Reputation: Research Agenda Using Strategy and Stakeholder Literature. Bus Soc 41(4)

  • Malik M, Ghaderi H, Andargoli A (2021) A resource orchestration view of supply chain traceability and transparency bundles for competitive advantage. Bus Strategy Environ 30(8)

  • Manatsa PR, McLaren TS (2008) Information Sharing in a Supply Chain: Using Agency Theory to Guide the Design of Incentives. Supply Chain Forum: an International Journal 9(1):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandi E, Chen X, Zhou KZ, Zhang C (2022) Loose lips sink ships: The double-edged effect of distributor voice on channel relationship performance. Ind Mark Manage 102:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskey R, Fei J, Nguyen HO (2020) Critical factors affecting information sharing in supply chains. Prod Plan Control 31(7):557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MHI&Deloitte Report (2022) 2022 MHI annual industry report

  • Modungwa M, Rinke M, Agigi A, Mocke K (2021) The role of strategic supplier relationships in enhancing supply chain innovation: A qualitative study in the South African automotive manufacturing industry. African J Sci Technol Innov Develop 13(1)

  • Newell WJ, Ellegaard C, Esbjerg L (2019) The effects of goodwill and competence trust on strategic information sharing in buyer–supplier relationships. J Bus Indust Market 34(2):389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng TWH, Feldman DC (2012) Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. J Organ Behav 33(2):216–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen MAT, Lei H, Vu KD, Le PB (2019) The role of cognitive proximity on supply chain collaboration for radical and incremental innovation: a study of a transition economy. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 34(3):591–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyaga GN, Lynch DF, Marshall D, Ambrose E (2013) Power Asymmetry, Adaptation and Collaboration in Dyadic Relationships Involving a Powerful Partner. J Supply Chain Manag 49(3):42–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onofrei G, Nguyen HM, Zhang M, Fynes B (2020) Building supply chain relational capital: The impact of supplier and customer leveraging on innovation performance. Bus Strateg Environ 29(8):3422–3434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parris DL, Dapko JL, Arnold RW, Arnold D (2016) Exploring transparency: a new framework for responsible business management. Manag Decision 54(1)

  • Patrucco A, Frattini F, di Benedetto A (2022) Characteristics of supplier performance measurement systems in collaborative innovation projects: the role of the purchasing department. Supply Chain Manag 27(2):207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson M (2006) The impact of operational structure, lateral integrative mechanisms and control mechanisms on intra-MNE knowledge transfer. Int Bus Rev 15(5)

  • Pihlajamaa M, Kaipia R, Aminoff A, Tanskanen K (2019) How to stimulate supplier innovation? Insights from a multiple case study. J Purch Supply Manag 25(3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm Sci Q 41(1):116–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulles NJ, Veldman J, Schiele H, Sierksma H (2014) Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation. J Supply Chain Manag 50(3)

  • PwC report (2020) Impact of COVID-19 on the supply chain industry

  • Quintana-García C, Benavides-Chicón CG, Marchante-Lara M (2021) Does a green supply chain improve corporate reputation? Empirical evidence from European manufacturing sectors. Ind Mark Manage 92:344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radas S, Božić L (2009) The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy. Technovation 29(6–7)

  • Sarafan M, Lawson B, Roehrich JK, Squire B (2022) Knowledge sharing in project-based supply networks. Int J Oper Prod Manag 42(6):852–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiele H (2012) Accessing supplier innovation by being their preferred customer. Res Technol Manag 55(1)

  • Schuler DA, Cording M (2006) A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. In Acad Manag Rev  31(3)

  • Selviaridis K, Wynstra F (2015) Performance-based contracting: a literature review and future research directions. Int J Prod Res 53(12):3505–3540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheaffer Z, Mano-Negrin R (2003) Executives’ orientations as indicators of crisis management policies and practices. J Manag Stud 40(2)

  • Shete PC, Ansari ZN, Kant R (2020) A Pythagorean fuzzy AHP approach and its application to evaluate the enablers of sustainable supply chain innovation. Sustain Prod Consumpt 23

  • Shou Z, Guo R, Zhang Q, Su C (2011) The many faces of trust and guanxi behavior: Evidence from marketing channels in China. Ind Mark Manage 40(4):503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhry HB, Abd Rahman A (2019) Enhancing supply chain performance through collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment. Bus Process Manag J 25(4)

  • Sodhi MMS, Tang CS (2019) Research Opportunities in Supply Chain Transparency. Prod Opera Manag 28(12)

  • Su HY, Fang SC, Young CS (2013) Influences of relationship transparency from intellectual capital reporting on supply chain partnerships with suppliers: a field experiment. Supply Chain Manag 18(2):178–193

  • Sumo R, van der Valk W, Duysters G, van Weele A (2016a) Using performance-based contracts to foster innovation in outsourced service delivery. Ind Mark Manage 59:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumo R, van der Valk W, van Weele A, Bode C (2016b) Fostering incremental and radical innovation through performance-based contracting in buyer-supplier relationships. Int J Oper Prod Manag 36(11):1482–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terpend R, Krause DR (2015) Competition or Cooperation? Promoting Supplier Performance with Incentives Under Varying Conditions of Dependence. J Supply Chain Manag 51(4):29–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang EWK, Zahra SA (2008) Organizational unlearning. Human Relations 61(10):1435–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse YK, Zhang M, Jia F (2018) The effects of risk and reward sharing on quality performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 38(12):2367–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uvet H, Adana S, Celik H, Cevikparmak S, Idug Y (2023) Quality investment as a catalyst for successful performance-based contracts: a relational view perspective. J Bus Indust Market

  • Van Dyne L, LePine JA (1998) Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad Manage J 41(1):108–119. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256902

  • van Hoek R (2019) Exploring blockchain implementation in the supply chain: Learning from pioneers and RFID research. Int J Opera Prod Manag 39

  • Verghese AJ, Koufteros X, Peters R (2020) Exploring the dual nature of supplier relationship commitment on buyer behaviors: Considering the levels of buyer-leverage. Int J Oper Prod Manag 40(2):196–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SM, Coley LS, Lindemann E (2011a) Effects of suppliers’ reputation on the future of buyer-supplier relationships: The mediating roles of outcome fairness and trust. J Supply Chain Manag 47(2)

  • Wagner SM, Coley LS, Lindemann E (2011b) Effects of suppliers’ reputation on the future of buyer-supplier relationships: the mediating roles of outcome fairness and trust. J Supply Chain Manag 47(2):29–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Lu Y, Zhao Y, Gong S, Li B (2013) Organisational unlearning, organisational flexibility and innovation capability: An empirical study of SMEs in China. Int J Technol Manag 61(2)

  • Wang X, Xi Y, Xie J, Zhao Y (2017) Organizational unlearning and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&A: the roles of routine and knowledge compatibility. J Knowl Manag 21(6):1580–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Lee PTW, Chan RYK (2021a) A study of the role of guanxi for value-added supply chain innovation. Int J Logist Res App

  • Wang Y, Yang L, Russo E, Graziano D (2021b) The incentive mechanism of knowledge sharing in cross-border business models based on digital technologies. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(22)

  • Wang Z, Zheng Z, Jiang W, Tang S (2021c) Blockchain-Enabled Data Sharing in Supply Chains: Model, Operationalization, and Tutorial. Prod Oper Manag 30(7):1965–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong DTW, Ngai EWT (2019) Critical review of supply chain innovation research (1999–2016). Indust Market Manag 82:158–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong W-P, Tan KH, Govindan K, Li D, Kumar A (2021) A conceptual framework for information-leakage-resilience. Ann Opera Res

  • Wu A, Li T (2020) Gaining sustainable development by green supply chain innovation: Perspectives of specific investments and stakeholder engagement. Bus Strategy Environ 29(3):962–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Yu G, Liu M, Rui M (2016) Improving learning alliance performance for manufacturers: Does knowledge sharing matter? Int J Product Econ 171

  • Yang KP, Chou C, Chiu YJ (2014) How unlearning affects radical innovation: The dynamics of social capital and slack resources. Technol Forecast Soc Change 87:152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y (2012) Bilateral inter-organizational learning in corporate venture capital activity: Governance characteristics, knowledge transfer, and performance. Manag Res Rev 35(5):352–378

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeniaras V, Di Benedetto A, Kaya I, Dayan M (2021) Relational governance, organizational unlearning and learning: implications for performance. J Bus Indust Market 36(3)

  • Zhang L, Liu H, Cai Z (2021) Addressing the consensus on information sharing in CPFR information systems: Insights from manufacturer – retailer dyads 60(11):3569–3588. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1926569

  • Zhang Y, Huo B, Haney MH, Kang M (2022) The effect of buyer digital capability advantage on supplier unethical behavior: A moderated mediation model of relationship transparency and relational capital. Int J Prod Econ 253

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is not funded by any organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Erzincan Universitesi, Ali Cavit Celebioglu Sivil Havacılık Yüksekokulu, Yalnızbag Yerleskesi, Erzincan, Turkey

    Abdüssamet Polater

Authors
  1. Abdüssamet Polater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdüssamet Polater.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polater, A. In pursuit of increasing supply chain innovation performance through suppliers’ promotive voice: the moderating role of unlearning and transparency. Oper Manag Res 17, 55–74 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00400-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00400-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation