Impact of mass customization on cost and flexiblity performances: the role of social capital

Abstract

More than ever, companies have to cope with ever changing market conditions. Some companies have reacted to shortened product life cycles, constant changes in customer preferences and cost pressures by implementing mass customization practices. Mass customization has been hailed as a way to overcome the tradeoff between cost and flexibility performance. However, there is lack of consistent empirical evidence to demonstrate that this really is the case. We advance this debate by proposing that in order for mass customization to be more effective, a company needs to possess and utilize social capital (i.e., cognitive, relational and structured social capital) within their supply networks. This study uses primary survey data from 513 plants from nine countries collected by the Global Manufacturing Research Group (GMRG). We used structural equation modelling analysis to test our hypotheses. Results indicate that mass customization has the ability to improve a company’s cost and flexibility performance. Furthermore, results regarding the moderating role of social capital are mixed. Cognitive capital only moderates the impact of mass customization on cost performance while relational capital increases this impact on both cost and flexibility performance. Structural capital does not moderate the impact of mass customization on performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Ahlstrom P, Westbrook R (1999) Implications of mass customization for operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19(3/4):262–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alderson W (1950) Marketing efficiency and the principle of postponement. Cost and Profit Outlook 3:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In Richardson, J.G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (p. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

  6. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cai S, Jun M, Yang Z (2010) Implementing supply chain information integration in China: the role of institutional forces and trust. J Oper Manag 28:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carey S, Lawson B, Krause DR (2011) Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. J Oper Manag 29:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chavez R, Fynes B, Gimenez C, Wiengarten F (2012) Assessing the effect of industry clockspeed on the supply chain management practice-performance relationship. Supply Chain Manag Int J 17(3):235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Christopher M (2000) The agile supply chain – competing in volatile markets. Ind Mark Manag 29(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Christopher M, Towill DR (2000) Supply chain migration from lean and functional to agile and customised. Supply Chain Manag Int J 5(4):206–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cousins PD, Handfield RB, Lawson B, Petersen KJ (2006) Creating supply chain relational capital: the impact of formal and informal socialization processes. J Oper Manag 24(6):851–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duray R, Ward PT, Milligan GW, Berry WL (2000) Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation. J Oper Manag 18:605–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferdows K, De Meyer A (1990) Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: in search of a new theory. J Oper Manag 9(2):168–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fiore AM, Lee SE, Kunz G (2004) Individual differences, motivations, and willingness to use a mass customization option for fashion products. Eur J Mark 38(7):835–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Flynn BB, Baofeng B, Zhao X (2010) The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J Oper Manag 28(1):8–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fogliatto FS, da Silveira GJC, Royer R (2003) Flexibility-driven index for measuring mass customization feasibility on industrialized products. Int J Prod Res 41(8):1811–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fogliatto FS, da Silveira GJC, Borenstein D (2012) The mass customization decade: an updated review of the literature. Int J Prod Econ 138:14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gandhi A, Magar C, Roberts R (2014) How technology can drive the next wave of mass customization. McKinsey & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Granovetter MS (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91:481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, Seventh edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hall JM, Johnson ME (2009) When should a process be art, not science? Harv Bus Rev 87(3):58–65

    Google Scholar 

  23. Houlihan JB (1985) International supply chain management. Int J Phys Distrib Mater Manag 15(1):22–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang X, Kristal MM, Schroeder RG (2008) Linking learning and effective process implementation to mass customization capability. J Oper Manag 26:714–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Inkpen AC, Tsang EWK (2005) Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Acad Manag Rev 30(1):146–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaccard J, Wan CK (1995) Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effect between continuous predictors using multiple regression: multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychol Bull 117:348–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang K, Lee HL, Seifert RW (2006) Satisfying customer preferences via mass customization and mass production. IIE Trans 38(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jitpaiboon T, Dobrzykowski DD, Ragu-Nathan TS, Vonderembse MA (2013) Unpacking IT use and integration for mass customisation: a service-dominant logic view. Int J Prod Res 51(8):2527–2547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Joereskog KG, Yang F (1996) Nonlinear structural equation models: the Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In: Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE (eds) Advanced structural equation modelling techniques. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koka BR, Prescott JE (2002) Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view. Strateg Manag J 23(9):795–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lawson B, Tyler BB, Cousins PD (2008) Antecedents and consequences of social capital on buyer performance improvement. J Oper Manag 26:446–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahmoud-Jouini SB, Lenfle S (2010) Platform re-use lessons from the automotive industry. Int J Oper Prod Manag 30(1):98–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Malhotra NK, Dash S (2011) Marketing research an applied orientation. Pearson Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. McGrath R, Sparks WL (2005) The importance of building social capital. Qual Prog 38(22):45–49

    Google Scholar 

  35. Misztal B (1996) Trust in modern societies. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(2):242–266

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nayak R, Padhye R, Wang L, Chatterjee K, Gupta S (2015) The role of mass customisation in the apparel industry. Int J Fash Des Technol Educ 8(2):162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. O’Leary-Kelly SW, Vokurka RJ (1998) The empirical assessment of construct validity. J Oper Manag 16(4):387–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Oh H, Chung MH, Labianca G (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: the role of informal socializing ties. Acad Manag J 47(6):860–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Piller FT, Moeslein K, Stotko CM (2004) Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration. Prod Plan Control 15(4):435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pine BJII (1993) Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  43. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544

    Google Scholar 

  44. Podsakoff M, MacKenzie SB, Lee J, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method bias in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Qu T, Bin S, Huang GQ, Yang HD (2011) Two-stage product platform development for mass-customisation. Int J Prod Res 49(8):2197–2219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenzweig ED, Roth AV (2004) Towards a theory of competitive progression: evidence from high-tech manufacturing. Prod Oper Manag 13(4):354–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rungtusanatham MJ, Salvador F (2008) From mass production to mass customization: hindrance factors, structural inertia, and transition hazard. Prod Oper Manag 17(3):385–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Salvador F, de Holan PM, Piller F (2009) Cracking the code of mass customization. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 50(3):71–78

    Google Scholar 

  49. Shin H, Collier DA, Wilson DD (2000) Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance. J Oper Manag 18(3):317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Squire B, Readman J, Brown S, Bessant J (2004) Mass customization: the key to customer value? Prod Plan Control 15(4):459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Squire B, Brown S, Readman J, Bessant J (2006) The impact of mass customization on manufacturing trade-offs. Prod Oper Manag 15(1):10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Acad Manag J 41(4):464–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tu Q, Vonderbrembse MA, Ragu-Nathan TS (2001) The impact of time-based practices on mass customization and value to customer. J Oper Manag 19:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Van Hoek R (1997) Postponed manufacturing: a case study in the food supply chain. Supply Chain Manag 2(2):63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Vickery SK, Jayaram J, Droege C, Calantone R (2003) The effects of integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. J Oper Manag 21(5):523–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Villena VH, Revilla E, Choi TY (2011) The dark side of buyer-supplier relationships: a social capital perspective. J Oper Manag 29:561–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Westbrook R, Williamson P (1993) Mass-customisation: Japan’s new frontier. European J Manag 11(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wiengarten F, Fynes B, Pagell M, de Burca S (2011) Exploring the impact of national culture on investments in manufacturing practices and performance: an empirical multi-country study. Int J Oper Prod Manag 31(5):554–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wiengarten F, Pagell M, Ahmed MU, Gimenez C (2013) Do a country’s logistical capabilities moderate the external integration performance relationship? J Oper Manag 31(1–2):51–63

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yang B, Burns ND, Backhouse CJ (2004) Postponement: review and an integrated framework. Int J Oper Prod Manag 24(5):468–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yao JM (2013) Scheduling optimisation of co-operator selection and task allocation in mass customisation supply chain based on collaborative benefits and risks. Int J Prod Res 51(8):2219–2239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang M, Lettice F, Zhao X (2015) The impact of social capital on mass customisation and product innovation capabilities. Int J Prod Res 53(17):5251–5264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zipkin P (2001) The limits of mass customization. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 42(3):81–87

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Wiengarten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiengarten, F., Singh, P.J., Fynes, B. et al. Impact of mass customization on cost and flexiblity performances: the role of social capital. Oper Manag Res 10, 137–147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-017-0127-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mass customization
  • Competitive strategy
  • Operational performance
  • Social capital