Abstract
This paper presents a conceptual framework that hypothesizes the nature of the relationships between a firm’s use of Internet-based information technology (IT), supply chain planning capability, and operational performance. Using data from 266 manufacturing sites and structural equation modeling, we show that the impact of IT on operational performance is contingent upon the intent of its use. Specifically, our results suggest that IT’s use in exploiting existing opportunities has both a direct effect and an indirect effect, mediated through supply chain planning capabilities, on operational performance. In contrast, when IT is used to explore new opportunities, it has neither a direct nor an indirect effect on operational performance. Implications of these research findings are reported.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amit R, Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manage J 14(1):33–46
Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423
Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Inf Syst Research 6(1):3–23
Bensaou M, Venkatraman N (1995) Configurations of interorganizational relationships: a comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Manag Sci 41(9):1471–1492
Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York
Brynjolfsson E (1993) The productivity paradox of information technology. Commun ACM 36(12):67–77
Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J Econ Perspect 14(4):23–48
Carr NG (2003) IT doesn't matter. Harvard Bus Rev 81(5):41–49
Cheng Y-T, Van de Ven AH (1996) Learning the innovation journey: order out of chaos? Organ Sci 7(6):593–614
Dean JW Jr, Snell SA (1991) Integrated manufacturing and job design: moderating effects of organizational inertia. Acad Manage J 34(4):776–804
Devaraj S, Krajewski L, Wei JC (2007) Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain. J Oper Manag 25(6):1199–1216
Dudek G, Stadtler H (2005) Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chains partners. Eur J Oper Res 163(3):668–687
Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manage J 21(10/11):1105–1121
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50
Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2001) Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. J Oper Manag 19(2):185–200
Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2002) Demand chain management in manufacturing and services: web-based integration, drivers and performance. J Oper Manag 20(6):729–745
Gounaris SP, Venetis K (2002) Trust in industrial service relationships: behavioral consequences, antecedents and the moderating effect of the duration of the relationship. J Serv Mark 16(7):636–655
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly 20(2):121–142
Hu LT, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3(4):424–453
Hunt S, Davis D (2008) Grounding supply chain management in resource-advantage theory. J Supply Chain Manag 44(1):10–21
Ittner CD, Larcker DF (1997) The performance effects of process management techniques. Manag Sci 43(4):522–535
Jarvis CB, Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J Consum Res 30(2):199–218
Kauffman RJ, Walden EA (2001) Economics and electronic commerce: survey and directions for research. Int J Electron Commer 5(4):5–116
Li G, Yang H, Sun L, Sohal AS (2009) The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance. Int J Prod Econ 120(1):125–138
Liu GJ, Shah R, Schroeder RG (2008). Managing supply chain uncertainties to achieve mass customization ability. Unpublished working paper, University of Memphis
MacCallum RC, Browne MW (1993) The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. Psychol Bull 114(3):533–541
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87
Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP (1988) Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull 103(3):391–410
Mckone-Sweet K, Lee Y (2009) Development and analysis of a supply chain strategy taxonomy. J Supply Chain Manag 45(3):2–24
Mukhopadhyay T, Kekre S, Kalathur S (1995) Business value of information technology: a study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quarterly 19(2):137–156
Naor M, Goldstein SM, Linderman KW, Schroeder RG (2008) The role of culture as driver of quality management and performance: infrastructure versus core quality practices. Decis Sci 39(4):671–702
Petersen KJ, Ragatz GL, Monczka RM (2005) An examination of collaborative planning effectiveness and supply chain performance. J Supply Chain Manag 41(2):14–25
Ray G, Barney JB, Muhanna WA (2004) Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strateg Manage J 25(1):23–37
Sanders NR (2008) Pattern of information technology use: the impact on buyer-supplier coordination and performance. J Oper Manag 26(3):349–367
Sanders NR, Premus R (2005) Modeling the relationship between firm IT capability, collaboration and performance. J Bus Logist 26(1):1–23
Shah R, Goldstein SM (2006) Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: looking back and forward. J Oper Manag 24(2):148–169
Shah R, Goldstein SM, Ward PT (2002) Aligning supply chain management characteristics and interorganizational information system types: an exploratory study. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 49(3):282–292
Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) The art of standards wars. Calif Manage Rev 41(2):8–32
Stevens GC (1989) Integrating the supply chain. Int J Phys Distrib Mater Manag 19(8):3–8
Tallon PP, Kraemer KL, Gurbaxani V (2000) Executives' perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. J Manage Inf Syst 16(4):145–173
Tan KC, Kannan VR, Handfield RB (1998) Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance. Int J Purch Mater Manage 34(3):2–9
Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad Manag Rev 14(3):423–444
Vickery SK, Jayaram J, Dröge C, Calantone R (2003) The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. J Oper Manag 21(5):523–539
Ward PT, McCreery JK, Ritzman LP, Sharma D (1998) Competitive priorities in operations management. Decis Sci 29(4):1035–1046
Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manage J 5(2):171–180
Wisner JD (2003) A structural equation model of supply chain management strategies and firm performance. J Bus Logist 24(1):1–26
Acknowledgement
We want to thank Emin Babakus, Anant Mishra, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments which have greatly improved the quality of the article. We also want to recognize the Babson College Research Fund for partial funding of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Gensheng (Jason) Liu, Kathleen McKone-Sweet and Rachna Shah contributed to the paper equally and are listed alphabetically.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, G., McKone-Sweet, K. & Shah, R. Assessing the performance impact of supply chain planning in net-enhanced organizations. Oper Manag Res 2, 33–43 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-009-0022-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-009-0022-6