Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the performance impact of supply chain planning in net-enhanced organizations

  • Published:
Operations Management Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework that hypothesizes the nature of the relationships between a firm’s use of Internet-based information technology (IT), supply chain planning capability, and operational performance. Using data from 266 manufacturing sites and structural equation modeling, we show that the impact of IT on operational performance is contingent upon the intent of its use. Specifically, our results suggest that IT’s use in exploiting existing opportunities has both a direct effect and an indirect effect, mediated through supply chain planning capabilities, on operational performance. In contrast, when IT is used to explore new opportunities, it has neither a direct nor an indirect effect on operational performance. Implications of these research findings are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amit R, Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manage J 14(1):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Inf Syst Research 6(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensaou M, Venkatraman N (1995) Configurations of interorganizational relationships: a comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Manag Sci 41(9):1471–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E (1993) The productivity paradox of information technology. Commun ACM 36(12):67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J Econ Perspect 14(4):23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr NG (2003) IT doesn't matter. Harvard Bus Rev 81(5):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y-T, Van de Ven AH (1996) Learning the innovation journey: order out of chaos? Organ Sci 7(6):593–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean JW Jr, Snell SA (1991) Integrated manufacturing and job design: moderating effects of organizational inertia. Acad Manage J 34(4):776–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj S, Krajewski L, Wei JC (2007) Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain. J Oper Manag 25(6):1199–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudek G, Stadtler H (2005) Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chains partners. Eur J Oper Res 163(3):668–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manage J 21(10/11):1105–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2001) Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. J Oper Manag 19(2):185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2002) Demand chain management in manufacturing and services: web-based integration, drivers and performance. J Oper Manag 20(6):729–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gounaris SP, Venetis K (2002) Trust in industrial service relationships: behavioral consequences, antecedents and the moderating effect of the duration of the relationship. J Serv Mark 16(7):636–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly 20(2):121–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu LT, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3(4):424–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S, Davis D (2008) Grounding supply chain management in resource-advantage theory. J Supply Chain Manag 44(1):10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittner CD, Larcker DF (1997) The performance effects of process management techniques. Manag Sci 43(4):522–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis CB, Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J Consum Res 30(2):199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman RJ, Walden EA (2001) Economics and electronic commerce: survey and directions for research. Int J Electron Commer 5(4):5–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Yang H, Sun L, Sohal AS (2009) The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance. Int J Prod Econ 120(1):125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GJ, Shah R, Schroeder RG (2008). Managing supply chain uncertainties to achieve mass customization ability. Unpublished working paper, University of Memphis

  • MacCallum RC, Browne MW (1993) The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. Psychol Bull 114(3):533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP (1988) Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull 103(3):391–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckone-Sweet K, Lee Y (2009) Development and analysis of a supply chain strategy taxonomy. J Supply Chain Manag 45(3):2–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay T, Kekre S, Kalathur S (1995) Business value of information technology: a study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quarterly 19(2):137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naor M, Goldstein SM, Linderman KW, Schroeder RG (2008) The role of culture as driver of quality management and performance: infrastructure versus core quality practices. Decis Sci 39(4):671–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen KJ, Ragatz GL, Monczka RM (2005) An examination of collaborative planning effectiveness and supply chain performance. J Supply Chain Manag 41(2):14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray G, Barney JB, Muhanna WA (2004) Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strateg Manage J 25(1):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders NR (2008) Pattern of information technology use: the impact on buyer-supplier coordination and performance. J Oper Manag 26(3):349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders NR, Premus R (2005) Modeling the relationship between firm IT capability, collaboration and performance. J Bus Logist 26(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah R, Goldstein SM (2006) Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: looking back and forward. J Oper Manag 24(2):148–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah R, Goldstein SM, Ward PT (2002) Aligning supply chain management characteristics and interorganizational information system types: an exploratory study. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 49(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) The art of standards wars. Calif Manage Rev 41(2):8–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens GC (1989) Integrating the supply chain. Int J Phys Distrib Mater Manag 19(8):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallon PP, Kraemer KL, Gurbaxani V (2000) Executives' perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. J Manage Inf Syst 16(4):145–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan KC, Kannan VR, Handfield RB (1998) Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance. Int J Purch Mater Manage 34(3):2–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad Manag Rev 14(3):423–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery SK, Jayaram J, Dröge C, Calantone R (2003) The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. J Oper Manag 21(5):523–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward PT, McCreery JK, Ritzman LP, Sharma D (1998) Competitive priorities in operations management. Decis Sci 29(4):1035–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manage J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner JD (2003) A structural equation model of supply chain management strategies and firm performance. J Bus Logist 24(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We want to thank Emin Babakus, Anant Mishra, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments which have greatly improved the quality of the article. We also want to recognize the Babson College Research Fund for partial funding of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen McKone-Sweet.

Additional information

Gensheng (Jason) Liu, Kathleen McKone-Sweet and Rachna Shah contributed to the paper equally and are listed alphabetically.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Measures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, G., McKone-Sweet, K. & Shah, R. Assessing the performance impact of supply chain planning in net-enhanced organizations. Oper Manag Res 2, 33–43 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-009-0022-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-009-0022-6

Keywords

Navigation