Abstract
This article reflects on possibilities for religious contributions to and engagement with gerontology. First, the article outlines some of the factors leading to gerontology’s emergence as a distinct discipline. Second, it traces the increasing pursuit of ‘successful’ or ‘positive’ ageing in gerontology, focusing on the work of John W. Rowe and Robert Kahn. Third, the article suggests how this pursuit has influenced religious scholars and practitioners aiming to contribute to scholarship on ageing. In particular this section focuses on recent research in the area of ageing and spirituality, and on how scholars working in this area have sought to promote spirituality as supporting and enhancing possibilities for success in ageing. Finally, drawing on Charles Taylor, the article concludes by suggesting some limits of the successful ageing paradigm and ageing and spirituality research, thereby opening a space for more robustly religious engagements with gerontology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not Applicable.
Notes
The USC Leonard Davis School established the first graduate programmes in gerontology in 1975. The term ‘gerontology’ had been earlier coined by the Russian zoologist Élie Metchnikoff in 1903. For a very brief overview of gerontology in the mid-twentieth century see Blaikie, 1999, pp. 60–62.
This shift away from pathology and abnormal ageing radically expands the domain of gerontology to managing and making prescriptions in all areas of life.
They write: ‘The very word “patient”, which is what we call ourselves when we seek medical care, implies passivity rather than responsibility for our own health.’ (1998, p. 40).
HammondCare, a major provider for aged-care services in Australia, has a Centre for Positive Ageing, which provides subscribers with a range of programs and activities to meet the challenges of ageing head-on and ‘provide realistic and practical tips to help you age as positively as possible.’ www.hammond.com.au/services/positive-ageing
There have of course also been more thoroughgoing critiques of the pursuit of successful ageing in and beyond geronology. See, for example, Sarah Lamb’s argument that successful ageing is a ‘particular cultural and biopolitical model’ and ‘in some ways a counterproductive one’ (2014).
There is a degree of slippage in how the terms ‘religion’ and ‘spirituality are often used in this context. I am using ‘religion’ as a broad concept and category, one which includes theology and religious institutions and traditions. When I use ‘spirituality’ I am largely following the definitions provided by Crowther et al. (2002) and Elizabeth MacKinlay, as quoted below.
While MacKinlay has undertaken research primarily in the Australian context, she has been central to international networks and collaboratoins.
MacKinlay was involved in establishing the International conferences and has also made important contributions to the Journal of Religion, Spirituality and Aging, both through her own research and her editorial work.
That is, understandings of spirituality in terms of meaning, relationality and depth.
That is, rather that speaking of religion using more generic and humanist language of meaning, value, wisdom, and so forth.
As Luther states in these 24, ‘he who has been emptied [Phil. 2: 7] through suffering… knows that God works and does all things in him’ (1957, p. 55).
See Siddiqui’s longer reflections on struggle in Human Struggle: Christian and Muslim Perspectives (2021).
See Lamb’s Aging and the Indian Diaspora (2009).
References
About the Journal. (2020). Public policy and ageing report. https://academic.oup.com/ppar. Accessed 12 Dec 2020.
Atchley, R. (2009). Spirituality and aging. John Hopkins University Press.
Blaikie, A. (1999). Ageing & popular culture. Cambridge University Press.
Carrette, J., & King, R. (2005). Selling spirituality: The silent takeover of religion. Routledge.
Crowther, M. R., Parker, M. W., Achenbaum, W. A., Larimore, W. L., & Koenig, H. G. (2002). Rowe and Kahn’s model of successful aging revisited: Positive spirituality—the forgotten factor. The Gerontologist, 42(5), 613–620.
Ellor, J. W. (2004). Word from the Editor. The Journal of Religion, Spirituality and Aging, 17(1–2), xxv–xxvi.
Goldsmith, M. (2008). Tracing rainbows through the rain: Addressing the challenge of dementia. In E. MacKinlay (Ed.), Ageing, disability and spirituality: Addressing the challenges of disability in later life. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Harper, S. (2006). Ageing societies. Hodder Education.
Jewel, A. (Ed.). (2004). Ageing, spirituality and well-being. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Jewell, A. (2016). Finding meaning and sustaining a purpose in later life. In M. Johnson & J. Walker (Eds.), Spiritual dimensions of ageing (pp. 179–197). Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, M., & Walker, J. (2016). Spirited ageing. In M. Johnson & J. Walker (Eds.), Spiritual dimensions of ageing (pp. 1–10). Cambridge University Press.
Julian of Norwich. (2015). Revelations of Divine Love. Translated by Barry Windeatt. Oxford University Press
Lamb, S. (2009). Aging and the Indian Diaspora: Cosmopolitan families in India and abroad. Indiana University Press.
Lamb, S. (2014). Permanent personhood or meaningful decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 49(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.12.006
Lamb, S., Robbins-Ruszowski, J., & Corwin, A. I. (2017). Successful aging as a contemporary obsession: Global perspectives. Rutgers University Press.
Luther, M. (1957). Heidelberg disputation. In J. Pelikan & H. T. Lehmann (Eds.), Luther’s works, volume 31: Career of the reformer. Fortress Press.
MacKinlay, E. (2001). The spiritual dimension of caring: Applying a model for spiritual tasks of ageing. Journal of Religious Gerontology, 12(3–4), 151–166.
MacKinlay, E. (2003). The spiritual dimension of ageing. In A. Jewell (Ed.), Ageing, spirituality and well-being (pp. 72–85). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
MacKinlay, E. (Ed.). (2008). Ageing, disability and spirituality: Addressing the challenges of disability in later life. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
MacKinlay, E. (Ed.). (2010a). Ageing and spirituality across faith and cultures. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
MacKinlay, E. (2010b). Ageing and spirituality: Living and being in multifaith and multicultural communities. In E. MacKinlay (Ed.), Ageing and spirituality across faith and cultures. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
MacKinlay, E. (2017). The spiritual dimension of ageing (2nd ed.). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
O’Mahony, S. (2016). The way we die now. Head of Zeus.
Rolfson, D. (2018). Successful aging and frailty: A systematic review. Geriatrics, 3(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics3040079
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. Pantheon Books.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (2015). Successful aging 2.0: Conceptual expansions for the 21st century. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 70(4), 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv025
Scott, J. (2014). Gerontology. A Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford University Press.
Siddiqui, M. (2020). Suffering – the price of being alive: An islamic perspective. https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/suffering-the-price-of-being-alive-an-islamic-perspective/. Accessed 6 June 2021.
Siddiqui, M. (2021). Human struggle: Christian and Muslim perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, J. K. (2014). How not to be secular: Reading Charles Taylor. Eerdmans.
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not Applicable.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mawson, M. Should we Pursue Success and Spirituality in Ageing? Framing Religious Contributions to Ageing Research. Population Ageing 14, 373–386 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-021-09336-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-021-09336-4