Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extending the Active Ageing Index to Hong Kong Using a Mixed-Method Approach: Feasibility and Initial Results

  • Published:
Journal of Population Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid demographic transition heightens the urgency to develop a monitoring mechanism for policymakers to evaluate the impact of population ageing. The Active Ageing Index (AAI), developed for 28 European Union countries, has served as a global quantitative toolkit to benchmark the diverse experience of active ageing and older people’s potential. One can presume that the experiences of Asian elders are different to those with Europeans who have different cultural backgrounds. Thus, an approach that incorporates Eastern culture needs to be developed. In this paper, key findings of the focus group discussions with older men and women across the territories of Hong Kong are summarized. The lay perceptions of active ageing in the general public are identified and compared with the constituents of the European AAI. Also, the relative importance of the indicators given by the older Chinese people were differentiated by their demographic characteristics. The extent to which the older Chinese citizens and the expert groups of the AAI revealed similar judgement on the relative importance of the indicators of active ageing are also examined. The results reported in this paper illustrate how the mixed-method approach could serve as an appropriate method in extending the active ageing research in the Asia-Pacific region. The insights obtained would inform the construction of a more meaningful AAI in the Asian context. It is argued that incorporating the perspective of older people to encapsulate the defining characteristics of active ageing will lead to a wider acceptance of the AAI in a policy-setting mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bottomley, P. A., & Doyle, J. R. (2001). A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: Good, better, and best. Omega, 29(6), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00044-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, P. A., & Doyle, J. R. (2013). Comparing the validity of numerical judgements elicited by direct rating and point allocation: Insights from objectively verifiable perceptual tasks. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(1), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M., & Bartlett, H. P. (2015). Ageing well across cultures. In J. Twigg & W. Martin (Eds.), Routledge handbook of cultural gerontology (pp. 285–292). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. M., & Liang, J. S. (2013). Active aging: Policy framework and applications to promote older adult participation in Hong Kong. [article]. Ageing International, 38(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-012-9166-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A., Phillips, D. R., Cheng, S.-T., Chi, I., & Ho, S. S. Y. (2004). Constructing a quality of life scale for older Chinese people in Hong Kong (HKQoLOCP). [journal article]. Social Indicators Research, 69(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-4516-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. K., Kwan, C. C. A., & Shek, T. L. D. (2005). Quality of life in Hong Kong: The CUHK Hong Kong quality of life index. Social Indicators Research, 71, 259–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A. M.-L., Ng, S.-H., Woo, J., & Kwan, A. Y.-H. (2006). Positive ageing: The views of middle-aged and older adults in Hong Kong. Ageing and Society, 26(2), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X05004228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CUHK Jockey Club Institute of Ageing (2014). Report on AgeWatch Index for Hong Kong 2014.

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, T. N. (2010). Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: Recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 10(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.10.29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, M. R., Howard, K., Sherrington, C., Ferreira, P. H., Rose, J., Gomes, J. L., et al. (2015). Eliciting older people's preferences for exercise programs: a best-worst scaling choice experiment. Journal of Physiotherapy, 61(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2014.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, H. H. (2013). Aging in culture. The Gerontologist, 53(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H. C., Tsai, C. Y., Chang, M. C., & Luh, D. L. (2010). Constructing area-level indicators of successful ageing in Taiwan. Health & Social Care in the Community, 18(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00875.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll-Dayton, B. (2011). The development of culturally-sensitive measures for research on ageing. Ageing and Society, 31(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R., & Howe, N. (2003). The 2003 aging vulnerability index: an assessment of the capacity of twelve developed countries to meet the aging challenge. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R., Howe, N., & Peter, T. (2013). The global aging preparedness index. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, P., Chatterji, S., Naidoo, N., Biritwum, R., Fan, W., Lopez Ridaura, R., Maximova, T., Arokiasamy, P., Phaswana-Mafuya, N., Williams, S., Snodgrass, J. J., Minicuci, N., D'Este, C., Peltzer, K., Boerma, J. T., & SAGE Collaborators. (2012). Data resource profile: The World Health Organization study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). International Journal of Epidemiology, 41(6), 1639–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, E. Z. K., & Thompson, C. L. (2016). Measuring active ageing among older adults in Singapore. Ageing and Society, 36(9), 1853–1869. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanakwang, K., Isaramalai, S.-A., & Hattakit, U. (2014). Thai cultural understandings of active ageing from the perspectives of older adults: a qualitative study. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 18(2), 152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCAP (2017). Addressing the challenges of population ageing in Asia and the Pacific: Implementation of the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing. United Nations.

  • WHO. (2002). Active ageing - a policy framework. Madrid: A contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W.-C. P., Lau, H.-P. B., Kwok, C.-F. N., Leung, Y.-M. A., Chan, M.-Y. G., Chan, W.-M., & Cheung, S. L. K. (2014). The well-being of community-dwelling near-centenarians and centenarians in Hong Kong a qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics, 14(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group (2016). Live long and prosper: Aging in East Asia and Pacific. In W. B. E. A. a. P. R. Report (Ed.).

  • Zaidi, A. (2013). Global AgeWatch index 2013: Purpose, methodology and results. London: HelpAge International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M. M., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., et al. (2012). Towards an active ageing index: Concept, methodology and first results. EC/UNECE, Active Ageing Index Project.

  • Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Zolyomi, E., Schmidt, A., Rodrigues, R., & Marin, B. (2017). Measuring active and healthy ageing in Europe. [Article]. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716676550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, A., Harper, S., Howse, K., Lamura, G., & Perek-Białas, J. (2018a). Building evidence for active ageing policies: Active Ageing Index and its potential. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, A., Parry, J., & Um, J. (2018b). Feasibility of developing a toolkit to monitor implementation of the Madrid international plan of action on ageing (MIPAA). Bangkok: The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, A., Um, J., Xiao, Q., & Parry, J. (2018c). Active ageing index for China comparative analysis with EU member states and Korea.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work reported in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [Project No.: CUHK 14606517]. Authors acknowledge the valuable comments received from the reviewers and from the AAI International Seminar in Bilbao, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doreen W. H. Au.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Au, D.W.H., Woo, J. & Zaidi, A. Extending the Active Ageing Index to Hong Kong Using a Mixed-Method Approach: Feasibility and Initial Results. Population Ageing 14, 53–68 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-020-09275-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-020-09275-6

Keywords

Navigation