Advertisement

Journal of Population Ageing

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 311–328 | Cite as

Productive Ageing Regimes in Europe: Welfare State Typologies Explaining Elderly Europeans’ Participation in Paid and Unpaid Work

  • Susanne StraussEmail author
  • Kathrin Trommer
Article
  • 348 Downloads

Abstract

The share of elderly in European populations has grown and these elderly are living healthier and longer lives. Policy makers in Europe have accordingly identified an increasing potential for this group to participate in different forms of paid and unpaid activities. In order to systematize European elderly’s productive activities, the article proceeds in two steps: First, it reviews previous research on country differences in European elderly’s participation in employment, informal care for elderly relatives and volunteering in clubs and associations. Based on data from the European Social Survey (ESS), in a second step we assess the analytical potential of different welfare state typologies, using linear regression models. Our analyses measure to what extent the typologies, which were developed for the general population, are suitable for explaining country differences in the elderly’s participation in paid and unpaid productive activities. We conclude that the north-south gradient, which we observe for all three types of productive ageing activities of elderly Europeans is mainly related to the role which welfare states attribute to the family. Welfare states with a high degree of de-familialisation fare best in encouraging their elderly men and women to participate in all types of paid and unpaid productive activities.

Keywords

Aging Employment Europe Family Social capital Welfare state 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We kindly thank the participants of the doctoral colloquium in Empirical Social Research at the University of Konstanz, Germany, as well as participants of the RC 28 Summer Meeting 2016 in Bern, Switzerland, for valuable comments. Moreover, we thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. European Social Survey data were kindly provided by Norwegian Social Science Data Services.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (grant no. STR 1322/2–1, AOBJ: 604,774).

Supplementary material

12062_2017_9184_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (251 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 251 kb)

References

  1. Attias-Donfut, C., Ogg, J., & Wolff, F.-C. (2005). Family support. In A. Börsch-Supan, A. Brugiavini, H. Jürges, J. Mackenbach, J. Siegrist, & G. Weber (Eds.), Health, ageing and Retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and Retirement in Europe (pp. 171–178). Strauss GmbH: Mörlenbach.Google Scholar
  2. Bettio, F., & Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10(1), 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt, M., Haberkern, K., & Szydlik, M. (2009). Intergenerational help and Care in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(5), 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caro, F. G. (2008). Produktives Altern und ehrenamtliches Engagement in den USA. In M. Erlinghagen & K. Hank (Eds.), Produktives Altern und informelle Arbeit in modernen Gesellschaften (pp. 75–90). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2006). Work-life ‘Balance’in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 49(4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrhardt, J. (2009). Ehrenamt. Formen, Dauer und kulturelle Grundlagen des Engagements. Berlin: Campus.Google Scholar
  8. Erlinghagen, M. (2008). Informelle Arbeit in alternden Gesellschaften-Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des, produktiven Alterns. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 128, 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erlinghagen, M., & Hank, K. (2008). Produktives Altern und informelle Arbeit in modernen Gesellschaften. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haberkern, K., Schmid, T., Neuberger, F., & Grignon, M. (2012). The role of the elderly as providers and recipients of care. In OECD (Ed.), The future of families to 2030 (pp. 189-257).Google Scholar
  13. Haberkern, K., & Szydlik, M. (2008). Pflege der Eltern - ein europäischer Vergleich. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 60(1), 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hank, K. (2011). Societal determinants of productive Aging: a multilevel analysis across 11 European countries. European Sociological Review, 27(4), 526–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hank, K., & Erlinghagen, M. (2005). Volunteer work. In A. Börsch-Supan, A. Brugiavini, H. Jürgens, J. Mackenbach, J. Siegrist, & G. Weber (Eds.), Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and Retirement in Europe (pp. 259–264). MEA: Mannheim.Google Scholar
  16. Hank, K., & Erlinghagen, M. (2010). Volunteering in “old” Europe: patterns, potentials, limitations. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hank, K., & Stuck, S. (2008). Gesellschaftliche Determinanten produktiven Alterns in Europa. In A. Börsch-Supan, K. Hank, H. Jürgens, & M. Schröder (Eds.), 50plus in Deutschland und Europa-Ergebnisse des Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (pp. 71-93, Produktives Altern und informelle Arbeit in modernen Gesellschaften). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Henz, U. (2009). Couples' provision of informal care for parents and parents-in-law: far from sharing equally? Ageing and Society, 29, 369–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janoski, T. (1998). Citizenship and civil society: A framework of rights and obligations in liberal, traditional, and social democratic regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kerschen, N. (2009). The welfare system of Luxembourg: from past dependency to the European approach. In K. Schubert, S. Hegelich, & U. Bazant (Eds.), The handbook of European welfare systems (pp. 310–327). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Kotsadam, A. (2011). Does informal eldercare impede women's employment? The case of European welfare states. Feminist Economics, 17(2), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lancee, B., & Radl, J. (2014). Volunteering over the life course. Social Forces, 93(2), 833–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis, J., & Ostner, I. (1994). Gender and the evolution of European social policy. In Working paper 4 of the Centre for Social Policy Research. Bremen: University of.Google Scholar
  24. Lundström, T., & Svedberg, L. (2003). The voluntary sector in a social democratic welfare state-the case of Sweden. Journal of Social Policy, 32(2), 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahon, R. (2002). Child care: Toward what kind of "social Europe"? Social Politics, 9(3), 343–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mills, M., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and the early life course. A theoretical framework. In H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills, & K. Kurz (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 1–24). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Mitton, L. (2009). The British welfare system: marketization from Thatcher to new labour. In K. Schubert, S. Hegelich, & U. Bazant (Eds.), The handbook of European welfare systems. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Morel, N. (2007). From subsidiarity to ‘free choice’: Child- and elder-care policy reforms in France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Social Policy & Administration, 41(6), 618–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrow-Howel, N., Hinterlong, J., & Sherraden, M. (2001). Productive Aging: Concepts and challenges. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C., & Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2005). Welfare states do not crowd out the family: evidence for mixed responsibility from comparative analyses. Ageing & Society, 25, 863–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Musick, M., & Wilson, J. (2008). Volunteers: a social profile (Vol. book, whole). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  32. OECD (2014). Labour force statistics. Employment Rates 2014. http://stats.oecd.org/OECDStat_Metadata/ShowMetadata.ashx?Dataset=LFS_SEXAGE_I_R&ShowOnWeb=true&Lang=en. Accessed 12 April 2015.
  33. Olafsdottir, S. (2007). Fundamental causes of health disparities: stratification, the welfare state, and health in the United States and Iceland. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 48(3), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O'Reilly, P., & Caro, F. G. (1995). Productive Aging. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 6(3), 39–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Welfare state policies and the developments of care arrangements. European Societies, 7(2), 321–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pichler, F., & Wallace, C. (2007). Patterns of formal and informal social Capital in Europe. European Sociological Review, 23(4), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2006). National Context, religiosity, and volunteering: results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2003). Institutional roots of volunteering: Toward a macro-stuctural theory of individual voluntary action. In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The values of volunteering. Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 71–90). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  40. Saraceno, C., & Keck, W. (2010). Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies, 12, 675–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarkisian, N., & Gerstel, N. (2004). Explaining the gender gap in help to parents: The importance of employment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Szelewa, D., & Polakowski, M. P. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Szinovacz, M. E., & Davey, A. (2008). The division of parent care between spouses. Ageing and Society, 28(4), 571–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Oorschot, W., & Arts, W. (2005). The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M. M., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., et al. (2013). Active Ageing Index 2012. Concept, methodology and final results. European Centre Vienna. available at: http://www.euro.centre.org/data/1453740620_84975.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and SociologyUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations