Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Two-Step Multivariate Composite I-Distance Indicator Approach for the Evaluation of Active Ageing Index

  • Published:
Journal of Population Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ageing population represents one of the most pressing issues of the modern society. Recognising the need for a proactive attitude, a multidimensional Active Ageing Index (AAI) has been introduced. In order to consider the AAI as a useful tool for future policy making, several weaknesses of the current methodology must be stressed out. Specifically, the assignment of weights to individual indicators is essentially a subjective procedure. As a possible remedy to the issue, this paper proposes the application of the statistical Composite I-distance Indicator (CIDI) method. The aim of this research is to introduce the use of a two-step CIDI approach that has several benefits. Firstly, the I-distance method, as an underlying foundation of CIDI, defines which of the input indicators/domains are most significant for the ranking process; therefore it allows the calculation of statistically based weights. Secondly, the obtained weights integrated into AAI framework provide more impartial rankings by each of the four domains and in total. Moreover, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis was applied to both the official and the proposed methodology, and the results imply that our proposal establishes a more stable ranking. Additionally, analysis has shown that input indicators/domains with the highest significance are areas in which implemented policies would contribute the most to Active Ageing goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschuler, J. (2001). Meaning and centrality of caring activities among older women. Journal of Women & Aging, 13(3), 79–100. doi:10.1300/J074v13n03_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amado, C. A., São José, J. M., & Santos, S. P. (2016). Measuring active ageing: a data envelopment analysis approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(1), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartusek, A., & Koucky, J. (2013). Access to a degree in Europe. In Inequality in tertiary education attainment 1950–2011. Prague: Charles University in Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börsch-Supan, A., Härtl, K., & Ludwig, A. (2014). Ageing in Europe: reforms, international diversification, and behavioral reactions. American Economic Review, 104(5), 224–229. doi:10.1257/aer.104.5.224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Amorim, R. C., & Hennig, C. (2015). Recovering the number of clusters in data sets with noise features using feature rescaling factors. Information Sciences, 324, 126–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disney, R. (2016). Pension reform in the United Kingdom: an economic perspective. National Institute Economic Review, 237(1), R6–R14. doi:10.1177/002795011623700111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dmitrovic, V., Dobrota, M., & Knezevic, S. (2015). A statistical approach to evaluating the bank productivity. Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management, 20(75), 47–56. doi:10.7595/management.fon.2015.0010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie, M. J., & Dail, D. (2013). Robustness and sensitivity of weighting and aggregation in constructing composite indices. Ecological Indicators, 29, 270–277. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrota, M., & Dobrota, M. (2016). ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity: what if the award factor was excluded? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(2), 480–482. doi:10.1002/asi.23527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrota, M., & Jeremic, V. (2016). Shedding the light on the stability of university rankings in the ICT Field. IETE Technical Review, 1–8. doi:10.1080/02564602.2016.1144487

  • Dobrota, M., Jeremić, V., Bulajić, M., & Radojičić, Z. (2015a). Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of PISA efficiency: distance based analysis approach. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 12(3), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrota, M., Martic, M., Bulajic, M., & Jeremic, V. (2015b). Two-phased composite I-distance indicator approach for evaluation of countries’ information development. Telecommunications Policy, 39(5), 406–420. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2015.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrota, M., Savic, G., & Bulajic, M. (2015c). A new approach to the evaluation of countries’ educational structure and development: the European study. European Review, 23(04), 553–565. doi:10.1017/S1062798715000277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrota, M., Bulajic, M., Bornmann, L., & Jeremic, V. (2016). A new approach to the QS university ranking using the composite I-distance indicator: uncertainty and sensitivity analyses. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 200–211. doi:10.1002/asi.23355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU (2010). Ageing well in the information society: action plan on information and communication technologies and ageing.

  • EU (2011). Decision no 940/2011/EU of the European parlament and the council. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:246:0005:0010:EN:PDF.

  • Eurofound (2012). Income from work after retirement in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012a). EEO review: employment policies to promote active ageing. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=6783&furtherPubs=yes.

  • European Commission. (2012b). European year for active ageing and solidarity between generations. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/archives/ey2012/ey2012main9ef0.html.

  • Fernández-Mayoralas, G., Rojo-Pérez, F., Martínez-Martín, P., Prieto-Flores, M. E., Rodríguez-Blázquez, C., Martín-García, S., et al. (2015). Active ageing and quality of life: factors associated with participation in leisure activities among institutionalized older adults, with and without dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 19(11), 1031–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formoza, M. (2016). Responding to the active ageing index: innovations in active ageing policies in Malta. Journal of Population Ageing, doi: 10.1007/s12062-016-9163-1

  • Foster, L., & Walker, A. (2013). Gender and active ageing in Europe. European Journal of Ageing, 10(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, L., & Walker, A. (2015). Active and successful aging: a European policy perspective. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 83–90. doi:10.1093/geront/gnu028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goerres, A. (2009). The political participation of older people in Europe: the greying of our democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, A., Antic, S., & Jeremic, V. (2015). A new perspective on quality characteristics determining supply chain management of coffee production. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 26(3), 239–244. doi:10.5755/j01.ee.26.3.5462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, B. L., & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 459–488. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9271-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Age Invaders. (2014). Age invaders. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21601248-generation-old-people-about-change-global-economy-they-will-not-all-do-so.

  • Išljamović, S., Jeremić, V., Petrović, N., & Radojičić, Z. (2015). Colouring the socio-economic development into green: I-distance framework for countries’ welfare evaluation. Quality and Quantity, 49(2), 617–629. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0012-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanovic, B. (1973). A method of establishing a list of development indicators. Paris: United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanović, B. (1977). Teorija klasifkacije. Beograd: Institut za ekonomiku industrije.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanovic, B., & Fanchette, S. (1973). Grouping and ranking of 30 countries of sub-Saharan Africa, two distance-based methods compared. Paris: United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeremic, V., & Jovanovic Milenkovic, M. (2014). Evaluation of Asian university rankings: position and perspective of leading Indian higher education institutions. Current Science, 106(12), 1647–1653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeremic, V., Bulajic, M., Martic, M., & Radojicic, Z. (2011). A fresh approach to evaluating the academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics, 87(3), 587–596. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0361-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic-Milenkovic, M., Brajovic, B., Milenkovic, D., Vukmirovic, D., & Jeremic, V. (2016). Beyond the equal-weight framework of the networked readiness index a multilevel I-distance methodology. Information Development, 32(4), 1120–1136. doi:10.1177/0266666915593136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., Campbell, M., & Huerta, C. (2008). Patterns of paid and unpaid work in Western Europe: gender, commodification, preferences and the implications for policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(1), 21–37. doi:10.1177/0958928707084450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madero-Cabib, I., & Kaeser, L. (2016). How voluntary is the active ageing life? A life-course study on the determinants of extending careers. European Journal of Ageing, 13(1), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maricic, M., & Kostic-Stankovic, M. (2016). Towards an impartial responsible competitiveness index: a twofold multivariate I-distance approach. Quality and Quantity, 50(1), 103–120. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0139-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maricic, M., Jankovic, M., & Jeremic, V. (2014). Towards a framework for evaluating sustainable society index. Romanian Statistical Review, 62(3), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marković, M., Zdravković, S., Mitrović, M., & Radojičić, A. (2016). An iterative multivariate post hoc I-distance approach in evaluating OECD better life index. Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0879-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, J. R. (2016). Social security and pension reform: international perspectives. Eastern Economic Journal, 42(3), 496–497. doi:10.1057/eej.2014.70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mui, A. C., & Burnette, J. D. (1994). A comparative profile of frail elderly persons living alone and those living with others. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 21(3–4), 5–26. doi:10.1300/J083V21N03_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordbakke, S., & Schwanen, T. (2014). Well-being and mobility: a theoretical framework and literature review focusing on older people. Mobilities, 9(1), 104–129. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.784542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011). Pensions at a glance 2011: retirement-income systems in OECD and G20 countries. OECD Publishing.

  • OECD (2012). Statistics on average effective age and official age of retirement in OECD countries. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/ageingandemploymentpolicies-statisticsonaverageeffectiveageofretirement.html.

  • Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., & Saltelli, A. (2013). Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in Society, 176(3), 609–634. doi:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01059.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson, K. (2006). The Nordic model of lifelong learning. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36(3), 327–341. doi:10.1080/03057920600872472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saisana, M., & D’Hombres, B. (2008). Higher education rankings: robustness issues and critical assessment. How much confidence can we have in higher education rankings? (EUR23487 ed.). Italy: Joint Research Centre, Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2788/92295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saisana, M., d’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40(1), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research, 81(1), 65–77. doi:10.1007/s11205-006-0024-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., et al. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. New York, NY, NY: John Wiley and Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470725184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savic, D., Jeremic, V., & Petrovic, N. (2016a). Rebuilding the pillars of sustainable society index: a multivariate post hoc I-distance approach. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 11(1), 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savic, D., Bogetic, Z., Dobrota, M., & Petrovic, N. (2016b). A multivariate approach in measurement of the sustainable development of European countries. Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management, 21(78), 73–86. doi:10.7595/management.fon.2016.0007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169. doi:10.2307/2026184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K., & Nussbaum, M. C. (1993). Capability and well-being, the quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soo, K. T. (2013). Does anyone use information from university rankings? Education Economics, 21(2), 176–190. doi:10.1080/09645292.2011.561626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarantola, S., & Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators: the art of mixing apples and oranges. In R. Munich (Ed.), Composite indicators – boon or bane. Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2013). World population ageing 2013. UN: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNECE/ European Commission. (2015). Active ageing index 2014: analytical report. Report prepared by Asghar Zaidi of centre for research on ageing, University of Southampton and David Stanton, under contract with UNECE (Geneva), co-funded by EC’s directorate general for employment, social affairs and inclusion (Brussels).

  • Van Puyenbroeck, T., & Rogge, N. (2017). Geometric mean quantity index numbers with benefit-of-the-doubt weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 256(3), 1004–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viitanen, T. K. (2007). Informal and formal care in Europe. IZA discussion paper no. 2648. Institute for the Study of Labor.

  • Wahl, H. W., Deeg, D. J., & Litwin, H. (2013). European ageing research in the social, behavioural and health areas: a multidimensional account. European Journal of Ageing, 10(4), 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55(1), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2008). Commentary: the emergence and application of active aging in Europe. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 21(1), 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., & Maltby, T. (2012). Active ageing: a strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 117–130. doi:10.1111/j.1468-397.2012.00871.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2002). Active ageing - a policy framework. The contribution of the world health organization to the second united nations world assembly on ageing, Madrid, Spain, April 2002.

  • Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M. H., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., … Zolyomi, E. (2013). Active ageing index 2012: concept, methodology and final results. report produced in collaboration with UNECE (Geneva) and European commission’s DG for employment, social affairs & inclusion, (Brussels).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Jove Ilica 154, Belgrade, Serbia

    Ivana Djurovic, Veljko Jeremic, Milica Bulajic & Marina Dobrota

Authors
  1. Ivana Djurovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Veljko Jeremic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Milica Bulajic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marina Dobrota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veljko Jeremic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djurovic, I., Jeremic, V., Bulajic, M. et al. A Two-Step Multivariate Composite I-Distance Indicator Approach for the Evaluation of Active Ageing Index. Population Ageing 10, 73–86 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-016-9169-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-016-9169-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation