Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Changing Geography of Scientific Knowledge Production: Evidence from the Metropolitan area Level

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The metropolitan areas act as incubators of new knowledge, and play a central role in the process of scientific knowledge production. On the basis of highly cited papers data, this paper adopts spatial scientometrics and social network analysis to investigate the geography, position and link of science cities between 2007 and 2017. The results are demonstrated below: (1) The two seemingly paradoxical trends, the regional concentration and global spread, coexist in the process of knowledge production, which are rapidly reshaping the global pattern of science. (2) The whole knowledge collaboration network has been dominated by the Global North cities, while the rise of the Global South cities has an increasing influence in the network, both driving the evolution of the world order. (3) The number of scientific collaborations between cities has increased dramatically, while domestic collaborations have higher strength than international collaborations. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this study and set out three directions in the future research agenda of knowledge production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalbers, M. B. (2004). Creative destruction through the anglo-american hegemony: A non-anglo-american view on publications, referees and language. Area, 36(3), 319–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557–560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, A. S., & Beckfield, J. (2004). Power and position in the world city system. American Journal of Sociology, 109(4), 811–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Balland, P. A., Jara-Figueroa, C., Petralia, S. G., Steijn, M. P. A., Rigby, D. L., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2020). Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 248–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & de Moya-Anegon, F. (2019). Spatial bibliometrics on the city level. Journal of Information Science, 45(3), 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., Heimeriks, G., & Balland, P. A. (2014). Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities. Research Policy, 43(1), 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, T. (2002). Cities for nations? Examining the city-nation-state relation in information age Malaysia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(2), 284–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, R., & Montobbio, F. (2016). European integration and knowledge flows across european regions. Regional Studies, 50(4), 709–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban-regional process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., Almirall, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2016). The city as a lab: Open innovation meets the collaborative economy. California Management Review, 59(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csomos, G. (2018). A spatial scientometric analysis of the publication output of cities worldwide. Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 547–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csomos, G. (2019). On the challenges ahead of spatial scientometrics focusing on the city level. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(1), 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csomos, G., & Toth, G. (2016). Exploring the position of cities in global corporate research and development: A bibliometric analysis by two different geographical approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 516–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csomos, G., Vida, Z. V., & Lengyel, B. (2020). Exploring the changing geographical pattern of international scientific collaborations through the prism of cities. Plos One, 15(11), e0242468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derudder, B., & Liu, X. J. (2016). How international is the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers? A social network analysis perspective. Environment and Planning A, 48(2), 309–329.

  • Derudder, B., & Taylor, P. J. (2018). Central flow theory: Comparative connectivities in the world-city network. Regional Studies, 52(8), 1029–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Ma, H., Shen, Z. (2017). A century of science: Globalization of scientific collaborations, citations, and innovations. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 1437–1446.

  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories - A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2001). Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1454–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DWUA (2017). Demographia World Urban Areas (Built-Up Urban Areas or World Agglomerations), 13th Annual Edition. Available at: http://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf (accessed 28 August 2017).

  • Florida, R. L. (2004). The rise of the creative class, revised Paperback Edition. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., Adler, P., & Mellander, C. (2017). The city as innovation machine. Regional Studies, 51(1), 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Borner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojevic, S. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379).

  • Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., & Hoekman, J. (2009). Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann, J. (1976). Megalopolitan systems around the world. Ekistics, 109–113.

  • Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 92–116.

  • Grossetti, M., Eckert, D., Gingras, Y., Jegou, L., Lariviere, V., & Milard, B. (2014). Cities and the geographical deconcentration of scientific activity: A multilevel analysis of publications (1987–2007). Urban Studies, 51(10), 2219–2234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q. C., Liu, C. L., Du, D. B., & Duan, D. Z. (2019a). The changing geography of global science. Environment and Planning A-Economy and Space, 51(8), 1615–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q., Liu, C., & Du, D. (2019b). Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum, 105, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, G., & Boschma, R. (2014). The path- and place-dependent nature of scientific knowledge production in biotech 1986–2008. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(2), 339–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & van Oort, F. (2009). The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 721–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huallachain, B. O., & Leslie, T. F. (2007). Rethinking the regional knowledge production function. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(6), 737–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack, P., Lachman, J., & Lopez, A. (2021). Scientific knowledge production and economic catching-up: An empirical analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 4565–4587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York, NY: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 752–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of Innovation. In R. Landau, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambooy, J. G. (2002). Knowledge and urban economic development: An evolutionary perspective. Urban Studies, 39(5–6), 1019–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengyel, B., Bokanyi, E., Di Clemente, R., Kertesz, J., & Gonzalez, M. C. (2020). The role of geography in the complex diffusion of innovations. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 15065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. C., & Phelps, N. (2018). Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta Region in China, 2014. Urban Studies, 55(2), 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, H. T., Li, Y. C., & Huang, X. D. (2021). Proximity and the evolving knowledge polycentricity of megalopolitan science: Evidence from China’s Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, 1990–2016. Urban Studies, 58(12), 2405–2423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maisonobe, M., Eckert, D., Grossetti, M., Jegou, L., & Milard, B. (2016). The world network of scientific collaborations between cities: Domestic or international dynamics? Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1025–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maisonobe, M., Jegou, L., & Cabanac, G. (2018). Peripheral forces. Nature, 563(7729), S18–S19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mallapaty, S. (2017). Metropolis of minds. Nature, 550(7676), S157–S157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72(3), 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen, C. W., & Schwarz, A. W. (1999). Scientific centres in Europe: An analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 36(3), 453–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen, C. W., Schwarz, A. W., & Find, S. (2010). World Cities of Scientific Knowledge: Systems, Networks and potential Dynamics. An analysis based on Bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 47(9), 1879–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nature Index (2018). Nature Index 2018 Science Cities. Available at: https://www.nature.com/nature-index/supplements/nature-index-2018-science-cities (accessed 25 August 2020).

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepelski, D., & De Prato, G. (2015). Corporate control, location and complexity of ICT R&D: A network analysis at the city level. Urban Studies, 52(4), 721–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomaler, O., & Verspagen, B. (2016). River deep, mountain high: Of long run knowledge trajectories within and between innovation clusters. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(6), 1259–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomaler, O., Frenken, K., & Heimeriks, G. (2014). On scaling of scientific knowledge production in US Metropolitan Areas. Plos One, 9(10), e110805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2.

  • Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2010). Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2011). Cities in a World Economy (4th Ed).). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigler, T. J., & Martinus, K. (2017). Extending beyond “world cities’’ in World City Network (WCN) research: Urban positionality and economic linkages through the Australia-based corporate network. Environment and Planning A, 49(12), 2916–2937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J., Derudder, B., Faulconbridge, J., Hoyler, M., & Ni, P. F. (2014). Advanced producer service firms as Strategic Networks, Global Cities as Strategic Places. Economic Geography, 90(3), 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic geography, 46(sup1), 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Division. (2018). The world population prospects: 2018 revision. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S. (2018). Collaborative era in Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WIPO. (2019). The geography of innovation: Local hotspots, global networks world intellectual property report. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., Zhang, C., & Lai, Q. (2014). China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(26), 9437–9442.

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Chenguang Program of Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (21CGA29), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M711152), Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science Project (22YJC790032), and Major Program of National Social Science Foundation of China (21ZDA011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

    Qinchang Gui, Debin Du & Chengliang Liu

  2. School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

    Qinchang Gui, Debin Du & Chengliang Liu

  3. Institute of Eco-Chongming, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

    Chengliang Liu

Authors
  1. Qinchang Gui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Debin Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chengliang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gui, Q., Du, D. & Liu, C. The Changing Geography of Scientific Knowledge Production: Evidence from the Metropolitan area Level. Appl. Spatial Analysis 17, 157–174 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09525-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09525-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation