Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 97–117 | Cite as

Quantifying the Effects of Economic and Labour Market Inequalities on Inter-Regional Migration in Europe – A Policy Perspective

  • Adam Dennett


This paper examines the economic and labour market influences acting upon inter-regional migration flows in Europe, against the backdrop of heightened political sensitivity to (im)migration issues, made more acute by the recent global financial crisis. Within the European Union, legislation guaranteeing the free movement of people between countries means that national governments are unable to control immigration in the ways that they would sometimes prefer. Migrants within the EU are primarily influenced by economic factors and so the potential for influencing migration through pre-existing systems for wealth redistribution are explored. It is shown that relatively small changes in regional economic and labour market inequalities can have large effects on migration volumes, but that for flows which are currently causing worry for governments, such as those from Romania and Bulgaria to the UK, the evidence is that present levels of wealth redistribution are unlikely to alter conditions sufficiently to arrest potential movements.


Migration Europe Logistic Regression Economic inequality Modelling Policy 


  1. Abel, G. J. (2010). Estimation of international migration flow tables in Europe. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 173, 797–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A. B. (2013). Reducing income inequality in Europe. In IZA/VEF workshop: A European labor market with full employment, more income security and less income inequality in 2020. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & von Ehrlich, M. (2010). Going NUTS: the effect of EU structural funds on regional performance. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 578–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benton, M., & Petrovic, M. (2013). How free is free movement? Dynamics and drivers of mobility within the European Union. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe.Google Scholar
  5. Borjas, G. (1989). Economic Theory and International Migration. International Migration Review, 23(3), 457–485.Google Scholar
  6. Champion, A. G., & Vandermotten, C. (1997). Migration, counterurbanization and regional restructuring in Europe. In H. H. Blotevogel & A. J. Fielding (Eds.), People, jobs and mobility in the new Europe (pp. 69–90). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J., Roig, M., Reuman, D., & GoGwilt, C. (2008). International migration beyond gravity: a statistical model for use in population projections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(40), 15269–15274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Beer, J., Raymer, J., van der Erf, R., & van Wissen, L. (2010). Overcoming the problems of inconsistent international migration data: a new method applied to flows in Europe. European Journal of Population, 26, 459–481. doi: 10.1007/s10680-010-9220-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dennett, A., & Wilson, A. (2013). A multi-level spatial interaction modelling framework for estimating inter-regional migration in Europe. Environment and Planning A, 45, 1491–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorling, D. (2010). Injustice: Why social inequality persists. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dustmann, C., Casanova, M., Fertig, M., Preston, I., & Schmidt, C. M. (2003). The impact of EU enlargement on migration flows. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2012). Employment and social developments in Europe 2012 Belgium: European Commission: Directorate-general for employment, social affairs and inclusion.Google Scholar
  13. Fihel, A., & Kaczmarczyk, P. (2009). Migration: A threat or a chance? Recent migration of poles and its impact on the polish labour market. In K. Burrell (Ed.), Polish migration to the UK in the ‘new’ european union: After 2004. Padstow: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. INFOREGIO. (2012). Regional Policy. Available at:
  15. Jefferson, M. (1939). The law of the primate city. Geographical Review, 29, 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MAC. (2011). Review of the transitional restrictions on access of Bulgarian and Romanian nationals to the UK labour market. Croydon: Migration Advisory Committee.Google Scholar
  17. May, T. (2012). Home secretary speech on ‘an immigration system that works in the national interest’. London: Home Office. Available at: ( Scholar
  18. Rees, P. (1977). The measurement of migration from census and other sources. Environment and Planning A, 9, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rees, P., & Kupiszewski, M. (1999). Internal migration and regional population dynamics in Europe: a synthesis. Strasbourg: Collection Demography, Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  20. Rolfe, H., Fic, T., Lalani, M., Roman, M., Prohaska, M., & Doudeva, L. (2013). Potential impacts on the UK of future migration from Bulgaria and Romania. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
  21. Therborn G. (2006). Inequalities of the World: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Travis, A., & Syal, R. (2013). Campaign to deter Romanian and Bulgarian immigrants ‘farcical’. London: The Guardian. Available at: Scholar
  23. UCLA. (2012). Ordinal Logistic Regression. Available at:
  24. Vargas-Silva, C. (2013). Migration flows of A8 and other EU migrants to and from the UK. In Briefing. Oxford: The Migration Observatory, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  25. Wilkinson, R.G & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Spatial AnalysisUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations