The objective of this research was to evaluate using land value tax as a potential policy tool to moderate sprawling development in Nashville, TN, the nation’s most sprawling metropolitan community with a population of one million or more. A land development model was used to evaluate the hypothesis that a land value tax encourages more development closer to areas of preexisting development than does the observed property tax scheme. For the median and lower and upper quartiles of empirical densities, results show that distances are shorter between areas of preexisting development and parcels predicted to be developed under a hypothetical land value tax policy than distances predicted under the observed tax scheme. This finding suggests that land value taxation could be used to design compact development strategies in Nashville, TN.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
See Wu and Cho (2007) for the specific land use policies under each category.
The built year information of 1800 was the oldest records available.
We could have estimated Eq. 1 with order of the time lagged period beyond q = 3, but considering the clear pattern of the percentage change in AIC, additional estimates were not generated.
The current tax rate in the county is $2.69 per $100 of assessed value per year.
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
Alexander, M. (2004). The “Creative Class” and economic development: An analysis of workforce attraction and retention in the Atlanta Region. http://www.cherry.gatech.edu/refs/student/AlexanderFinalPaper2004.pdf
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93–115.
Anselin, L. (2004). GeoDa™ 0.9.5-i release notes. Urbana: Spatial Analysis Laboratory and Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Autant-Bernard, C. (2006). Where do firms choose to locate their R&D? A spatial conditional logit analysis on French data. European Planning Studies, 14(9), 1187–1208.
Beenstock, M., & Felsenstein, D. (2007). Spatial vector autoregressions. Spatial Economic Analysis, 2(2), 167–196.
Bell, K., & Irwin, E. G. (2002). Spatially-explicit micro-level modeling of land use change at the rural-urban interface. Agricultural Economics, 27, 217–232.
Beron, K. J., Murdoch, J. C., & Vijverberg, W. P. M. (2003). Why cooperate? Public goods, economic power, and the Montreal Protocol. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 286–297.
Bills, N. L. & Boisvert, R. N. (1987). New York's experience in farmland retention through agricultural districts and use-value assessment, Soil and Water Conservation Society, 231–250.
Bockstael, N. (1996). Modeling economics and ecology: the importance of a spatial perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 1168–1180.
Bockstael, N., & Bell, K. (1998). Land use patterns and water quality: the effect of differential land management controls. In R. Just & S. Netanyahu (Eds.), International water and resource economics consortium, conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources. Dordrecht: Kluwater Academic Publishers.
Bourassa, S. C. (1990). Land value taxation and housing development: effects of property tax three types of cities. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 49, 101–111.
Brookings Institute. (2000). Moving beyond sprawl: The challenge for metropolitan Atlanta. Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. http://www.brookings.edu/urban.
Brueckner, J. K. (1986). A modern analysis of the effects of site value taxation. National Tax Journal, 39, 49–58.
Brueckner, J. K. (2000). Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review, 23(2), 160–171.
Brueckner, J. K. (2001). Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. In W. G. Gale & J. R. Pack (Eds.), Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs (pp. 65–89). Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
Brueckner, J., & Kim, H. (2003). Urban sprawl and the property tax. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(1), 5–23.
Carrion-Flores, C., & Irwin, E. G. (2004). Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(4), 889–904.
Case, K. E., & Grant, J. H. (1991). Property tax incidence in a multijurisdictional neoclassical model. Public Finance Quarterly, 19(4), 379–392.
Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1995). Understanding the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 40, 327–335.
Cho, S., Lambert, D. M., & Roberts, R. K. (2010). Forecasting open space with a two-rate property yax. Land Economics, 86.
Cho, S., & Newman, D. H. (2005). Spatial analysis of rural land development. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 732–744.
Cho, S., Poudyal, N. C., & Lambert, D. M. (2008). Estimating spatially varying effects of urban growth boundaries on land development and land value. Land Use Policy, 25, 320–329.
Cho, S., & Roberts, R. K. (2007). Cure for urban sprawl: measuring the ratio of marginal implicit prices of density-to-lot-size. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29, 572–579.
Coughlin, C. C., Garrett, T. A., & Hernández-Murillo, R. (2003). Spatial probit and the geographic patterns of State Lotteries. St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank Working Paper 2003-042B. http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2003/2003-042.pdf.
Cumberland Commercial Partners. (2009). Nashville development. http://www.cumberlandcommercial.com/nashville-development.php.
Daniels, T., & Bowers, D. (1997). Holding our ground. Washington, DC: Island.
Dixler, A. O. (2006). Direct taxes under the constitution: a review of the precedents. Taxanalysts.
ESRI. (2004). ESRI data & maps 2004. http://www.esri.com/data/data-maps/.
Fisher, G. W. (1997). The evolution of the American property tax. In R.T. Golembiewski & J. Rabin (Eds.), Public budgeting and finance. Marcel Dekker.
Franzese Jr. R. J., & Hays, J. C. (2004). Modeling international diffusion: Inferential benefits and methodological challenges, with an application to international tax competition. WZB Papers, SP II 2004-12.
Garrett, T. A., Wagner, G. A., & Wheelock, D. C. (2005). A spatial analysis of state banking regulation. Papers in Regional Science, 84(4), 575–595.
Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–741.
GeoDa Center. (2009). GeoDa. http://geodacenter.asu.edu/.
Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. W. (1998). Prove it. Brookings Review, 16(4), 23–26.
Hanham, R., & Spiker, J. S. (2005). Urban sprawl detection using satellite imagery and geographically weighted regression. In R. Jensen, J. Gatrell & D. McLean (Eds.), Geo-spatial technologies in urban economics. Berlinthebe: Springer.
Hannan, E. J., & Quinn, B. G. (1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 41, 190–195.
Hastings, W. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov Chains and their applications. Biometrika, 57, 97–109.
Henderson, J. V. (1991). Optimal regulation of land development through price and fiscal controls. Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 64–82.
Holloway, G., Shankar, B., & Rahman, S. (2002). Bayesian spatial probit estimation: a primer and an application to HYV rice adoption. Agricultural Economics, 27, 383–402.
Hylton, T. (2004). The walking life. http://www.saveourlandsaveourtowns.org/parkandwalk.html.
Irwin, E. G., Bell, K. P., & Geoghegan, J. (2003). Modeling and managing urban growth at the rural–urban fringe: a parcel-level model of residential land use change. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 32, 83–102.
Irwin, E. G., Bell, K. P., & Geoghegan, J. (2006). Forecasting residential land use change. In R. J. Johnston & S. K. Swallow (Eds.), Economics and contemporary land use policy: development and conservation at the urban-rural fringe. Washington, DC: Resource for the Future Press.
Irwin, E. G., & Bockstael, N. E. (2001). The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 698–704.
Irwin, E. G., & Bockstael, N. E. (2002). Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 31–54.
Irwin, E. G., & Bockstael, N. E. (2004). Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34, 705–725.
Katz, B. (2000). The federal role in curbing sprawl. Annals of the American Academy, 572, 66–77.
Katz, B. (2002). Smart growth: The future of the American metropolis? Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion London School of Economics. CASEpaper 58.
Lacombe, D. J., & Shaughnessy, T. M. (2005). An examination of a congressional vote using Bayesian spatial probit techniques. Paper presented at the 2005 Meetings of the Public Choice Society.
LeSage, J. P. (2000). Bayesian estimation of limited dependent variable spatial autoregressive models. Geographical Analysis, 32, 19–35.
Levine, N. (1999). The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California. Urban Studies, 36(12), 2047–2068.
McMillen, D. P. (1992). Probit with spatial autocorrelation. Journal of Regional Science, 32, 335–348.
McMillen, D. P., & McDonald, J. F. (1993). Could zoning have increased land values in Chicago? Journal of Urban Economics, 33(2), 167–188.
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953). Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical physics, 21, 1087–1091.
Mills, E. S. (1998). The economic consequences of a land tax. In D. Netzer (Ed.), Land value taxation: Could it work today? Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
MPD (2009). Metro Planning Department, Davidson County. http://www.nashville.gov/mpc/.
Mukherjee, B., & Singer, D. A. (2007). Monetary institutions, partisanship, and inflation targeting. International Organization, 62(2), 323–358.
Murdoch, J. C., Sandler, T., & Vijverberg, W. P. M. (2003). The participation decision versus the level of participation in an environmental treaty: A spatial probit analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 87(2), 337–362.
Nasser, H. E., & Overberg, P. (2001). A comprehensive look at sprawl in America. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/news/sprawl/main.htm.
Nechyba, T. J. (1998). Replacing capital taxes with land taxes: efficiency and distributional implications with an application to the United States economy. In D. Netzer (Ed.), Land value taxation: Could it work today? Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Nechyba, T. J., & Walsh, R. P. (2004). Urban sprawl. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4), 177–200.
Nelson, A. C., & Sanchez, T. W. (2005). The effectiveness of urban containment regimes in reducing exurban sprawl. DISP, 160, 42–47.
Netusil, N. R. (2005). The effect of environmental zoning and amenities on property values: Portland. Oregon Land Economics, 81(2), 227–246.
Novo, A. (2003). Contagious currency crises: A spatial probit approach. Working Paper: http://www.bportugal.pt/publish/wp/2003-5.pdf.
Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1997). The impact of urban land taxation: the Pittsburgh experience. National Tax Journal, 50(1), 1–21.
Phillips, J., & Goodstein, E. (2000). Growth management and housing prices: the case of Portland, Oregon. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(3), 334–344.
Plantinga, A. J., & Bernell, S. (2005). A spatial economic analysis of urban land use and obesity. Journal of Regional Science, 45, 473–492.
Princeton Survey Research Associates. (2000). Research—straight talk from Americans—2000. National Survey for the Pew Center for Civic Journalism. http://www.pewcenter.org/doingcj/research/r_ST2000nat1.html#sprawl.
Rathbun, S. L., & Fei, S. (2006). A spatial zero-inflated Poisson regression model for oak regeneration. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 13(4), 409–426.
Richardson, J. J., Jr., Gough, Z. M., & Puentes, R. (2003). Is home rule the answer?: Clarifing the influence of Dillon’s rule on growth management. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
Rybeck, R. (2004). Using value capture to finance infrastructure and encourage compact development. Public Works Management & Policy, 8(4), 249–260.
Schoettle, F. P. (2003). What public finance do State Constitutions allow? In S. B. White, R. D. Bingham & E. W. Hill (Eds.), Financing economic development in the 21st century. ME: Sharpe.
Schofield, N., Miller, G., & Martin, A. (2003). Critical elections and political realignments in the USA: 1860–2000. Political Studies, 51(2), 217–240.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
Shao, J. (1997). An asymptotic theory for linear model selection. Statistica Sinica, 7, 221–264. http://www3.stat.sinica.edu.tw/statistica/oldpdf/A7n21.pdf.
Shinkai, K., Kanagawa, S., Takizawa, T., & Yamashita, H. (2008). Decision analysis of fuzzy partition tree applying AIC and fuzzy decision. In I. Lovrek, R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain (Eds.), KES 2008, Part III, LNAI 5179 (pp. 572–579). Berlin: Springer.
Siegel, S. (1956). Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test. In S. Siegel (Ed.), Nonparameteric statistics for the behavioral sciences (pp. 127–136). Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd.
Sierra Club. (2009). Stop sprawl. A complex relationship: population growth and suburban sprawl. http://www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/population.asp.
Skaburskis, A. (1995). The consequences of taxing land value. Journal of Planning Literature, 10(1), 3–21.
Smart Growth America. (2000). Americans want growth and green; demand solutions to traffic, haphazard development. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/newsroom/pressrelease101600.html.
Smart Growth America. (2003). Measuring sprawl and its impact: The character & consequences of metropolitan expansion. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/sprawlindex/sprawlexecsum.html.
Smith, T. E., & LeSage, J. P. (2000). A Bayesian probit model with spatial dependencies. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania.
Snyder, K., & Bird, L. (1998). Paying the costs of sprawl: Using fair-share costing to control sprawl. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
Southeast Watershed Forum. (2001). Growing smarter: Linking land use & water quality. Newsletter 4. http://www.southeastwaterforum.org/pdf/newsletters/SEWF_Spring2001.pdf.
Turnbull, G. K., & Geon, G. (2004). Local Government internal structure, external constraints, and the median voter hypothesis. Georgia State University. Working paper.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2000). The state of the cities 2000.
Walls, M., & McConnell, V. (2004). Incentive-based land use policies and water quality in the Chesapeake Bay. Discussion paper 04-20. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-DP-04-20.pdf.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge: The MIT.
Wu, J., & Cho, S. (2007). The effect of local regulations on urban development in the Western United States. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 69–86.
Cho, Kim, and Roberts are, respectively, assistant professors, graduate research assistant, and professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN. The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of the University of Tennessee.
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, SH., Gyu Kim, S. & Roberts, R.K. Measuring the Effects of a Land Value Tax on Land Development. Appl. Spatial Analysis 4, 45–64 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-009-9039-3
- Compact development
- Land value tax
- Land development model
- Spatial-probit model
- Urban Sprawl