Abstract
This paper describes how the UK’s National Classification of Output Areas was validated through the use of ground-truthing conducted by the authors. To get an independent view on the classification across a wide spread of places, a consultation exercise was devised inviting colleagues and contacts to comment on the classification for an area with which they are familiar. This proved to be a largely successful exercise. Not only did it broadly support the quality of the classification, but respondents also provided a wealth of comments and suggestions for current and future work.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Booth, C. (1902-1903) Inquiry into the life and labour of the people in London. London: Macmillan. Cited in Charles Booth Online Archive, http://booth.lse.ac.uk/static/a/3.html, accessed 14/06/2009.
Bond, S., & Insalaco, F. (2007). Area classification of super output areas and datazones. Project Final Report. London: Office for National Statistics, [online] http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/methodology_by_theme/area_classification/soa_dz/downloads/SOA_DZ_Area_Classification_methodology.pdf, accessed 14/06/2009.
CLG. (2009). Indices of deprivation 2007. Communities and Local Government Department, [online] http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/neighbourhoodrenewal/deprivation/deprivation07/, accessed 14/06/2009.
Dennett, A., & Stillwell, J. (2009). A new migration classification for local authority districts in Britain. Working Paper 09/02, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. [online] http://www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/wpapers/09-02.pdf, accessed 14/06/2009.
Dorling, D., Mitchell, R., Shaw, M., Orford, S., & Davey Smith, G. (2000). The ghost of Christmas past: health effects of poverty in London in 1896 and 1991. British Medical Journal, 321, 1547–1551.
Engels, F. (1845). Die Lage der arbeiten klasses in England/The condition of the working class in England in 1844, translated by F. Kelley Wischnewetzky. London: Allen & Unwin.
Falkenauer, E., & Marchand, A. (2001). Using K-means? Consider ArrayMiner. Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Mathematics and Engineering Techniques in Medicine and Biological Sciences. (METMBS’2001), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, June 25–28, 2001. [online] http://www.optimaldesign.com/Download/ArrayMiner/AMatMETMBS2001.pdf, accessed 14/06/2009.
Harris, R., Sleight, P., & Webber, R. (2005). Geodemographics, GIS and neighbourhood targeting. London: Wiley.
Jones, H., Kettle, J., & Unsworth, R. (2004). The roofs over our heads: Housing supply and demand, Chapter 4. In R. Unsworth & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Twenty-First Century Leeds: Geographies of a Regional City (pp. 75–102). Leeds: University of Leeds Press.
Martin, D. (2002). Output Areas for 2001. In P. Rees, D. Martin & P. Williamson (Eds.), The census data system (pp. 37–46). Chichester: Wiley.
ODPM. (2002). Updating the English Indices of Deprivation 2000: Stage 1 Consultation Report, Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, [online] http://www.neighbourhood.gov.uk/publications.asp?did=176, accessed 14/06/2006.
ONS. (2003). National Statistics Code of Practice: Protocol on Quality Management. [online] http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/consultations/general_consultations/downloads/Protocol_on_Quality_Management_Draft.pdf
ONS. (2005). Area classification for Output Areas [online] http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/methodology_by_theme/area_classification/oa/default.asp, accessed 14/06/2006.
ONS (2006). Understanding the 2001 Census Area Classification for Output Areas [online] http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/Info.do?info=link.jsp?page=CaseStudies_Classification.htm, accessed 14/06/2006.
Openshaw, S., Blake, M., & Wymer, C. (1995). Using neurocomputing methods to classify Britain’s residential areas. In P. Fisher (Ed.), Innovations in GIS 2 (pp. 97–111). London: Taylor and Francis.
Output Area Classification User Group. (2007). Output area classification user Group—OAC: Open and Free Geodemographics [online] http://www.areaclassification.org.uk/ accessed 14/03/2008.
Output Area Classification User Group. (2009). Case studies. [online] http://areaclassification.org.uk/case-studies/
Park, R. E., McKenzie, R. D., & Burgess, E. (1925). The city: Suggestions for the study of human nature in the urban environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickles, J. (1995). Representations in an electronic age: Geography, GIS, and Demography, in Chapter 1. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 1–30). London: Guilford.
Rees, P. (1979). Residential patterns in American cities: 1960. The University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Paper No.189.
Rees, P. H. (1998). What do you want from the 2001 Census? Results of an ESRC/JISC survey of user views. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1775–1796.
Rees, P., Denham, C., Charlton, J., Openshaw, S., Blake, M., & See, L. (2002). ONS classifications and GB profiles: Census typologies for researchers. In P. Rees, D. Martin & P. Williamson (Eds.), The census data system (pp. 149–170). Chichester: Wiley.
Shevky, E., & Bell, W. (1955). Social area analysis: Theory, illustrative applications and computational procedures. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Vickers, D. (2006a). Multi-level integrated classifications using the 2001 Census, PhD thesis, School of Geography, University of Leeds, [online] http://www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/people/old/d.vickers/thesis.html, accessed 14/06/2009
Vickers, D. (2006b) Classification: accounting for behaviours and patterns. Chapter 7 in Vickers, D. (2006). Multi-level integrated classifications using the 2001 Census, PhD thesis, School of Geography, University of Leeds, pp. 211–245, [online] http://www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/people/old/d.vickers/d.vickers_thesis_c7.pdf, accessed 14/06/2009.
Vickers, D., & Rees, P. (2006). Introducing the National Classification of Census Output Areas. Population Trends, 125, 15–29.
Vickers, D., & Rees, P. (2007). Creating the UK National Statistics 2001 output area classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 170(2), 379–403.
Vickers, D., Rees, P., & Birkin, M. (2005). Creating the National Classification of Census Output Areas: Data, Methods and Results, Working Paper 05/2, School of Geography, University of Leeds, [online] http://www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/wpapers/05-2.pdf, accessed 14/06/2006.
Voas, D., & Williamson, P. (2001). The diversity of diversity: a critique of geodemographic classification. Area, 33(1), 63–76.
Založnik, M. (2006). Geographical variation of geodemographic classifiability. MA Thesis, University of Liverpool.
Acknowledgements
The funding was provided for the project by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and CASE partner, the Office for National Statistics (CASE Award PTA033-2002-00067) and an ESRC Postdoctoral Fellowship (Award PTA-163-27-1006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vickers, D., Rees, P. Ground-truthing Geodemographics. Appl. Spatial Analysis 4, 3–21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-009-9037-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-009-9037-5