Skip to main content
Log in

Short and Medium term Dynamics and their Influence on Acquisitive Crime Rates in the Transition States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 1990s saw the three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania change from centrally planned to more market oriented economies with associated societal transformations. Profound changes such as these create uncertainty and social instability that can lead to social problems including increased rates of crime and disorder. We report and comment upon Police recorded crime data that shows numbers of acquisitive and drug related crimes in the three states from 1993 to 2000. However the scale of economic change including the mediating effects of social institutions may vary from place to place within each state. Acquisitive crime is a phenomenon typical of urban or densely populated regions in the Baltic countries. Analysing regional variation in crime rates provides an opportunity to test whether negative socio-economic change impacts on rates for these crimes. Findings show weak evidence of the effect of social change on crime. Spatial statistical techniques and GIS (Geographical Information Systems) underpin the methodology employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The average population of their regions is 1,850,000. The smallest population is 79,000, the largest 8,537,000. The standard deviation is 1,497,000 (Pridemore, personal communication).

  2. Since its creation in 1995, the Corruption Perception Index has sought to quantify the perception of business people and country analysts of the degree of corruption in a country. From 1998 to 2006 the score of Baltic countries has improved but still ranks relatively low (in 2006: Estonia 6.7, Latvia 4.7 and Lithuania 4.8; where 10 is highly clean and 0 is highly corrupt) in comparison with their Scandinavian neighbours (Transparency International 2007).

  3. A list of the experts who participated in this survey is shown at http://www.infra.kth.se/sp/Research/Transition/analytic1.htm

  4. Another factor that also may have affected crime rates in the Baltic countries is that the total population in these countries decreased during this period. Since crime rates are often calculated based on resident population, certain regions might have reached a peak when natural increase was negative and out migration positive.

  5. Estonia had missing data on foreign direct investment. Missing values were replaced by using other regressors in the model as instrumental variables, as suggested by Pindyck and Rubinfeld 1998; Kim and Pridemore 2005. The variable with the missing observation was regressed on all other independent variables that had complete data (index of social change for Lithuania and Latvia and Index of welfare change for Lithuania and Latvia) and used the predicted values to replace the missing data.

  6. International Crime Victimisation Survey (ICVS) were carried out in Estonia in 1993, 1995 and 2000; in Latvia (Riga region) in 1996, 1998 and 2000; in Lithuania (Vilnius) in 1997 and 2000. Living Conditions Surveys (LCS) were performed in all Baltic countries in 1994 and 1999.

  7. Crime data comparison using data from the Estonian Police Board, Latvia’s Ministry of Interior, Lithuania’s Ministry of Interior, Home Office (2003), European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics (1996, 2003) and population data: UNECE (2002) available at http://w3.unece.org/pxweb/Dialog/.

  8. Because the Estonian islands are physically separated from the mainland and historically have had a different crime history, they were excluded from the analysis.

  9. However this may not be a real change effect. The measure of social change is simply a difference in divorce rates at two points in time divided by the number of years to give a per annum rate of change. Disaggregating the change variable and combining parameter estimates with the divorce rate variable yields a measure that shows offence rates increasing with past divorce rates.

  10. The same comment applies as for thefts (see footnote 9). However, following the same disaggregation, Latvia’s car related theft rate shows a strong association with the divorce rate in 2000.

References

  • Aasland, A., & Flotten, T. (2001). Ethnicity and social exclusion in Estonia and Latvia. Europe-Asia Studies, 53, 1023–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahven, A. (2002). Crime in the Baltic states: comparing official statistics with survey data. In P. Nieuwbeerta (Ed.), Crime victimization in comparative perspective. Results from the International Crime Victims Survey, 1998–2000 (pp. 67–79). Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahven, A. (2004). Public safety and well-being. Social trends 3. Statistical Office of Estonia. Tallinn, 108–117.

  • Anselin, L. (2003). GeoDa 0.9.3 User’s Guide. Spatial Analysis Laboratory, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 6180, available at (https://geoda.uiuc.edu/pdf/geoda093.pdf)

  • Berglund, S., Aarebrot, F., Vogt, H., & Karasimeonov, G. (2001). Challenges to Democracy (pp. 148–151). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernburg, J. G. (2002). Anomie, social change and crime: a theoretical examination of institutional-anomie theory. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 729–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhagen, P., & Marsh, M. (2007). Voting and protesting: explaining citizen participation in old and new European Democracies. Democratisation, 14(1), 44–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, R., & Grasmick, H. (1993). Neighbourhoods and Crime: The dimensions of effective community control. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, W. E. (1992). Crime in the Soviet Union: early glimpses of the true story. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 144–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, V. (2007). Crime dynamics at Lithuanian borders. European Journal of Criminology, 4, 131–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, V. (2008). Expressive crimes in post-socialist states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 9, 2–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, V., & Haining, R. (2004). Crime in border regions: the Scandinavian case of Öresund, 1998–2001. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 807–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, V., Haining, R., & Signoretta, P. (2002). Exploring crime statistics in Stockholm using spatial analysis tools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 22, 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (1995). Assessing Messner and Rosenfed’s institutional anomie theory: a partial test. Criminology, 33, 411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M. E., & Chaudry, A. (1997). The dynamics of childhood poverty. The Future of Children, 7, 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daunora, J., & Juskevicius, P. (2006) Regional planning in Lithuania: experiences and challenges. In U. Altrock, S. Guntner, S. Huning, D. Peters (eds.), Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States, from adjustment to reinvention (pp. 77– 94). Aldershot: Ashgate.

  • Del Frate, A. A., & van Kesteren, J. (2004). Criminal victimisation in urban Europe. UNICRI (Available at http://www.unicri.it/icvs, 18 November 2006).

  • Durkheim, E. (1897). Suicide: a study in sociology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurogeographics (2005). SABE 2004 – Seamless Administrative Boundaries of Europe User Guide, version 1.0, 38 p.

  • European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice statistics (1996). draft model European Committee on Crime Problems (chair: M. Killias), Strasbourg: Council of Europe. (Available at http://www.europeansourcebook.org/, 16 March 2006).

  • European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics (2003). Second Edition European Council, Committee of Experts (chair: M. Killias) The Hague/London/Paris: WODC/Home Office/ESC-École des sciences criminelles, 2003 ISBN 90-5454-408-2, (Series:) Onderzoek en beleid, no. 212. (Available at http://www.minjust.nl:8080/b_organ/wodc/reports/ob212i.htm, 16 March 2006).

  • Europol (2004). 2004 European Union organised crime report p. 26. Luxembourg: Europol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2003). New Chronos Database: Number of divorces per 100 new marriages in the corresponding year. (Available at http://www.eurofound.eu.int/areas/qualityoflife/index.htm, 07 July 2006).

  • Gavrilova, N. S., Semyonova, V., Evdokushkina, G. N., & Gavrilov, L. A. (2000). The response of violent mortality to economic crisis in Russia. Population Research and Policy Review, 19, 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruszczynska, B., & Gruszczynska, M. (2004). Crime in enlarged Europe: comparison of crime rates and victimization risks. Transition Studies Review, 12, 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haining, R. (2003). Spatial data analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen M, Sire’n R, Aromaa K (2004). Victimisation and Fear in Finland 2003. Interim Report of the 2003 National Survey of Victimisation to Accidents, Violence, Property Crime, and Fear. Research Communications 59.

  • Holloway, K., Bennett, T., & Lower, C. (2004). Trends in drug use and offending: the results of the NEW-ADAM Programme 1999–2002. Home office, Findings 219, London (available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/r219.pdf, 03 October 2006)

  • Iwaskiw, R. (1996). Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania: country studies. Washington: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurgelenas, A., Mieliauskaite, D., & Filipaviciute, R. (2005). From the former Soviet Union: socioeconomic health inequalities exist in post-communist Lithuania. British Medical Journal, 331, 236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. W., & Pridemore, W. A. (2005). Social change, institutional anomie and serious property crime in transitional Russia. British journal of criminology, 45, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1990). The road to a free economy. New York: W.W.Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehti, M. (2001). Homicide trends in Estonia, 1971–1996. In H. Ylikangas, P. Karonen, & M. Lehti (Eds.), Five centuries of violence in Finland and the Baltic area (pp. 133–192). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon, D. A., & Shkolnikov, V. M. (1998). Social stress and the Russian mortality crisis. Journal of the American medical association, 279, 790–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévay, M. (2000). Social changes and rising crime rates: the case of central and eastern Europe. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 8, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. (1999). The changing relationship between income and crime victimisation. Economic Policy Review, 5, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. (1997). Political Participation in Postcommunist Democracies. In D. Potter, et al. (Ed.), Democratization (p. 459). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G., & Zhang, T. (2007). Loglinear residual tests of Moran’s I autocorrelation and their application to Kentucky breast cancer data. Geographical Analysis, 39, 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2005). Crime patterns during the market transition in China. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 613–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotspeich, R. (1995). Crime in the transition economies. Europe-Asia Studies, 47, 555–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marana, I. (2006). Development and Planning in Latvia, the Riga Region and the City of Riga. In U. Altrock, S. Guntner, S. Huning, & D. Peters (Eds.), Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States, from adjustment to reinvention (pp. 225–243). Aldershot: Ashgate.

  • Merton, R. K. (1967). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: a cross national application of institutional anomie theory. Social Forces, 75, 1393–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCPD, and National Commissioner of Danish Police. Status Report on Organised Crime in Denmark in 2001 (2002). [cited. Available from (http://www.politi.dk/PUBL/Organiseret_kriminalitet_2000/Orgkrim_2001_endeligversion_eng.doc.

  • Nilsson, A., & Estrada, F. (2006). The inequality of victimisation: trends in exposure to crime among rich and poor. European Journal of Criminology, 3, 387–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D., & Chambers, J. (2000). Social disorganization outside the metropolis: an anlysis of rural youth violence. Criminology, 38, 81–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampel, F., & Gartner, R. (1995). Age structure, socio-political institutions, and national homicide rates. European Sociological Review, 11, 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, L. G. W. (1999). Cigarett smugglingens struktur, omfattning och utveckling under senare delen av 1990-talet: Fran ax till limpa. Stockholm: BRÅ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipov, D., & Dorbritz, J. (2003). Demographic consequences of economic transition in countries of central and eastern Europe. Population studies, 39, Council of Europe, 208p. (Available at http://www.coe.int/T/E/social_cohesion/population/, 10 July 2006).

  • Pichler-Milanovich, N. (1997). The role of Baltic cities in the European urban system: forgotten cities or important regional actors. In M. Åberg, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Baltic cities: Perspectives on urban and regional change in the Baltic sea area. Lund: Nordic Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformations: the political and economic origins of our times (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridemore, W. A., & Spivak, A. L. (2003). Patterns of suicide mortality in Russia. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour, 33, 132–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saar, J., Markina, A., Ahven, A., Annist, A., & Ginter, J. (2003). Crime in Estonia 1991–2001, 2nd ed. Tallinn: Juura, (in Estonian and English), 2002.

  • Salt, J. (2005). Current trends in international migration in Europe. Council of Europe, CDMG (2005) 2. (Available at http://www.coe.int/t/e/social_cohesion/migration/documentation/Publications_and_reports/2005%20Salt’s%20report%20English.pdf, August 28, 2007)

  • Sampson, R. J. (1983). Structural density and criminal victimization. Criminology, 21, 276–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighbourhood and crime: the structural determinants of personal victimization. Jo, Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 7–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1986). Crime in cities: the effects of formal and informal social control. Crime and Justice, 8, 271–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state and homicide: further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38, 1021–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickley, A., & Mäkinen, I. H. (2005). Homicide in the Russian empire and soviet union: continuity or change? British Journal of Criminology, 45, 647–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammaru, T. (2005). Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn metropolitan area. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1669–1687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2007). Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), (Available at http://www.transparency.org/, 23 August, 2007).

  • Trickett, A., Ellingworth, D., Hope, T., & Pease, K. (1995). Crime victimisation in the eighties. British Journal of Criminology, 35, 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, C. (1994). The growth of crime in Russia and the Baltic region: RFE/RL Research Report.

  • Young, J., & Mathews, R. (2003). New Labour, crime control and social exclusion. In R. Mathews, & Y. Young (Eds.),The new politics of crime and punishment. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support of The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation (Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, grant J2004-0142:1) is gratefully acknowledged by the authors. Thanks also to colleagues Andri Ahven, Aira Veelmaa (Estonia), Alfredas Kiskis, Danguole Bikmanaite (Lithuania) and Andris Kairiss (Latvia) for providing data and support during the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vânia Ceccato.

Additional information

This paper is part of the project ‘States in transition and their geography of crime’, financed by The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation (Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, grant J2004-0142:1), at the Department of Urban Planning and Environment, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Characteristics of the dataset
Table 5 Descriptive statistics at the administrative area level

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ceccato, V., Haining, R. Short and Medium term Dynamics and their Influence on Acquisitive Crime Rates in the Transition States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Appl. Spatial Analysis 1, 215–244 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-008-9009-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-008-9009-1

Keywords

Navigation