![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12055-021-01249-3/MediaObjects/12055_2021_1249_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12055-021-01249-3/MediaObjects/12055_2021_1249_Fig2_HTML.png)
References
Fischlein T, Folliguet T, Meuris B, et al. Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161:920–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.162.
Meco M, Montisci A, Miceli A, et al. Sutureless perceval aortic valve versus conventional stented bioprostheses: meta-analysis of postoperative and midterm results in isolated aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e006091. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006091.
Thourani VH, George I, Rucinskas K, et al. First in human experience with an epicardial beating heart device for secondary mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161:949–58.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.169.
Raman J, Hare D, Storer M, Hata M. Epicardial cardiac basal annuloplasty: preliminary findings on extra-cardiac mitral valve repair. Heart Lung Circ. 2009;18:401–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2009.05.704.
Takaseya T, Shiose A, Saraiva RM, et al. Novel epicardial off-pump device for mitral regurgitation: acute evaluation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:1291–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.11.054.
Yoon SK, Song H, Lim JY. Effect of the proximal anastomosis configuration of the radial artery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Chest Surg. 2021;54:117–26. https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.20.082.
Deb S, Cohen EA, Singh SK, Une D, Laupacis A, Fremes SE. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:28–35.
Jung SH, Song H, Choo SJ, et al. Comparison of radial artery patency according to proximal anastomosis site: direct aorta to radial artery anastomosis is superior to radial artery composite grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:76–83.
Lemma M, Mangini A, Gelpi G, Innorta A, Spina A, Antona C. Is it better to use the radial artery as a composite graft?: clinical and angiographic results of aorto-coronary versus Y-graft. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26:110–7.
Calderon-Rojas RD, Greason KL, King KS, et al. Outcomes of tricuspid valve operation at the time of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111:1252–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.106.
Góngora E, Dearani JA, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Li Z, Sundt TM 3rd. Tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:163–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.06.051.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics committee approval
Not applicable to this section as it is a reflection of already published articles across the world and not a new research.
Informed consent
Not required as this section is purely for academic purposes and it fully acknowledges the original work by authors and publishers. Permission of copyright material has been sought wherever necessary.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hinduja, M. ROVING PEN. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 37, 608–611 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01249-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01249-3