Skip to main content

Surgical outcome of elective total arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to compare the surgical outcome between total arch replacement with coronary bypass surgery and that without.

Methods

Between 2008 and 2016, 157 consecutive patients underwent total arch replacement with antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest using the proximal first approach. They were divided into two groups: total arch replacement with coronary bypass surgery (group 1, n = 38) and that without (group 2, n = 119).

Results

Of the 38 patients in group 1, 37 (97%) were asymptomatic. The left internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein were used in one (2.6%) and 38 (100%) patients, respectively. The mean number of coronary anastomoses was 1.5 ± 1.0. In-hospital mortality rate was 3.8%. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and operation time in group 1 were significantly longer than those in group 2 (336 ± 52 min vs. 276 ± 38 min, P < 0.0001 and 702 ± 122 min vs. 619 ± 94 min, P < 0.0001, respectively). No differences in in-hospital mortality and perioperative myocardial infarction were found between the groups (5.3% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.633 and 0% vs. 1.7%, P = 1.000, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio, 1.208; 95% confidence interval, 1.041–1.497; P = 0.008) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (odds ratio, 1.019; 95% confidence interval, 1.001–1.041; P = 0.041) were significant determinants of in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions

Although prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time was a significant determinant of in-hospital mortality, total arch replacement with coronary bypass surgery could be safely performed with favorable outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Okada K, Omura A, Kano H, et al. Recent advancement of total arch replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:139–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ehrlich MP, Ergin MA, McCullough JN, et al. Predictors of adverse outcome and transient neurological dysfunction after ascending aorta/hemiarch replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1755–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fukui T, Shimokawa T, Tabata M, Takanashi S. Outcomes of total aortic arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13:284–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Takashima N, Suzuki T, Asai T, et al. Outcome of total arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:990–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muehrcke DD, Cornhill JF, Thomas JD, Cosgrove DM. Flow characteristics of aortic cannulae. J Card Surg. 1995;10:514–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Groom RC, Hill AG, Kuban B, et al. Aortic cannula velocimetry. Perfusion. 1995;10:183–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tominaga R, Kurisu K, Ochiai Y, et al. Total aortic arch replacement through the L-incision approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:121–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Imasaka K, Tayama E, Tomita Y. The impact of carotid or intracranial atherosclerosis on perioperative stroke in patients undergoing open aortic arch surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:1045–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ergin MA, Galla JD, Lansman SL, Quintana C, Bodian C, Griepp RB. Hypothermic circulatory arrest in operations on the thoracic aorta. Determinations of operative mortality and neurologic outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:788–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hollier LH, Kazmier FJ, Ochsner J, Brown JC, Procter CD. “Shaggy” aorta syndrome with atheromatous embolization to visceral vessels. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:439–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz ES, Tunick PA, Rusinek H, Ribakove G, Spencer FC, Kronzon I. Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:70–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yokoyama H. Aortic arch aneurysm complicated with coronary artery disease: still a surgical challenge? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;8:62–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yokoyama H, Sato Y, Takase S, Takahashi K, Wakamatsu H, Sato Y. Introduction of off-pump coronary artery bypass into aortic arch aneurysm repair: a new solution for the surgical treatment of multiorgan arteriosclerosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:935–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gall S Jr, Lowe JE, Wolfe WG, Oldham HN Jr, Van Trigt PIII, Glower DD. Efficacy of the internal mammary artery in combined aortic valve replacement-coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:524–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kazui T, Washiyama N, Muhammad BA, et al. Total arch replacement using aortic arch branched grafts with the aid of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:3–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Daimon M, Miyata H, Motomura N, et al. Outcomes of thoracic aortic surgery in patients with coronary artery disease. – based on the Japan Adult Cardiovascular Surgery Database. Circ J. 2019;83:978–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song YB, Arbab-Zadeh A, Matheson MB, et al. Contemporary descrepancies of stenosis assessment by computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:e007720. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded by any agency or institution.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept/design: KI, YT

Data analysis/interpretation: KI

Drafting article: KI

Critical revision of article: YT, SM, AS

Approve of article: KI, YT, SM, AS

Statistics: KI

Data collection: KI

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken-ichi Imasaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict interest.

Ethics approval

This study complies with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imasaka, Ki., Tomita, Y., Morita, S. et al. Surgical outcome of elective total arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 36, 572–579 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-020-01013-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-020-01013-z

Keywords

  • Total arch replacement
  • CABG
  • Proximal first approach
  • In-hospital mortality
  • Morbidity