Skip to main content
Log in

Graft patency study in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) is known to reduce operative morbidity, intensive care and hospital stay and blood usage. Recent reports have highlighted the poor results after off-pump coronary artery bypass. So, we decided to look at the angiographic patency of our patients at the end of 3 months.

Methods

Out of 265 patients who underwent isolated primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in a 2-year period at our institution, 118 are the subjects for this study. The anticoagulation and antiplatelet protocols are explained in detail. These patients underwent computerised tomography (CT) of coronary arteries to evaluate the graft patency. The results were studied by a competent radiologist with advanced Windows 4.7 workstation.

Results

There were 118 patients with a total of 380 anastomoses for evaluation. Twenty patients (16.95%) had some of their grafts blocked. Out of a total of 380 anastomoses, 24 were found to be blocked (6.3%). Left internal mammary artery had 98.3% patency. Left radial artery showed a patency rate of 96%. Saphenous vein grafts had a patency rate of 91.2%. The anterior and inferior territory grafts were patent in greater than 95% of patients, whereas lateral wall grafts were patent in 86% of patients. There was no mortality in this series. One patient reported angina. Fifty-eight patients had a treadmill test and 51 were negative and 7 had positive results for inducible ischemia.

Conclusions

OPCAB is a safe technique with acceptable clinical outcome and angiographic patency in experienced hands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, et al. Off pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity – meta analysis of randomised and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46:872–82.

  2. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Lotto AA, Pitsis AA, Angelini GD. Economic outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. A prospective randomised study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2237–42.

  3. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost and quality- of- life outcomes: a randomised trial. JAMA. 2004;291;1841–9.

  4. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:394–402.

  5. Cleveland JC Jr, Shroyer AL, Chen AY, Peterson E, Grover FL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1282–8.

  6. Keogh BE, Kinsman R. Fifth national adult cardiac surgical database report for 2003. Henley on Thames, United Kingdom: Dendrite clinical systems; 2004.

  7. Sajja LR. The journey of surgery for coronary artery disease in India: Adoption,Customization and Innovation. Sadasivam Oration. Ind J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;30:116–128.

  8. Sajja LR, Mannan G, Sompally S. Extrafascially harvested radial artery graft in CABG: technique of harvest, complications, and mid-term angiographic patency. J Card Surg. 2005;20:440–448.

  9. Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, et al. One-Year coronary bypass graft patency – A randomised comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery Angiographic results of the PRAGUE 4 Trial. Circulation. 2004;110:3418–3423.

  10. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary- artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1489–97.

  11. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2359–68.

  12. Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularisation. Results from the Veterans Affairs Randomised On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Trial. Circulation. 2012;125:2827–2835.

  13. Houlind K, Fenger-Gron M, Holme SJ, et al. Graft Patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is inferior even with identical heparinisation protocols: Results from Danish on-pump versus off-pump randomisation study (DOORS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1812–9.

  14. Angelini GD, Culliford L, Smith DK, et al. Effect of on- and off-pump coronary artery surgery on graft patency, survival and health related quality of life: Long-term follow-up of 2 randomized controlled trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:295–303.

  15. Diegler A, Borgermann J, Kappert U, et al. Off-Pump versus On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1189–98.

  16. Nicolini F, Fortuna D, Contini GA, et al. Comparison between off and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: long-term results of a real world registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50:528–535.

  17. Fukui T, Tabata M, Manabe S, Shimokawa T, Takanashi S. Graft selection and one-year patency rates in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1901–5.

  18. Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery. Results from a Department of Veteran affairs cooperative study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2149–56.

  19. Yoo KJ, Choi D, Choi BW, Lim SH, Chang BC. The comparison of graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting using coronary angiography and multi-slice computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:86–91.

  20. Yammamoto M, Kimura F, Niinami H, Suda Y, Ueno E, Takeuchi Y. Noninvasive assessment of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery by 16-channel multidetector-row computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:820–7.

  21. Bassri H, Salari F, Noohi F, et al. Evaluation of early graft patency after coronary artery bypass graft surgery using multislice computed tomography angiography. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009;9:53.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Pavithran, Ms. Ambika and Ms. Divya for their secretarial assistance in tabulation of results and typing works.

Funding

No funding from any agency has been received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arani Raghavendra Rao Raghuram.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the patients before the procedure.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raghuram, A.R.R., Subramanyan, K., Sivakumaran, S. et al. Graft patency study in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 34, 6–10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-017-0587-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-017-0587-x

Keywords

Navigation