Skip to main content
Log in

Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting; anatomical variations to be considered

  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Predictable intrathoracic course, anatomical proximity to heart and long-term patency has made Internal thoracic artery (ITA) a conduit of choice in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Its frequent bilateral use has necessitated the need to have a comparative knowledge of surgical anatomy of ITA on both sides.

Methods

A random study was conducted on 100 adult human cadavers. Sternocostal wall was removed and fixed in 10% formalin and dissected for detailed anatomy of ITA. All observations were expressed as mean ± 2SD and appropriate statistical analysis conducted.

Observations

ITA originated in common trunk with other branches of subclavian artery in 12% on right side and 4% on left. Mean length of right ITA was 20.15 ± 1.22 cm, left 19.83 ± 1.66 cm in 28% of cases where bilateral ITA terminated in 6th Intercostal space (ICS). On pattern of origin of sternal branches from ITA 3 groups were observed. Group-I-some sternal branches arising from common trunk of ITA on both sides (24%), Group-II-some sternal branches arising from common branch of ITA on one side only (54%), Group-III-all sternal branches arising directly from ITA on both sides (22%). Phrenic nerve crossed anterior to ITA on both sides in 52%, posteriorly in 14% and in remaining it crossed anteriorly on one side and posteriorly on other.

Conclusion

Variations as described in our study in relations to phrenic nerve, level of bifurcation and sternal blood supply must be kept in mind while harvesting bilateral ITA to reduce risk of sternal dehiscence by preserving the sternal blood supply from common trunk and to prevent post operative phrenic nerve palsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reardon MJ, Conklin LD, Reardon PR, Baldwin JC. Coronary artery bypass conduits: review of current status. J Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 38: 201–209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117: 855–872.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Galbut DL, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, et al. Seventeen years experience with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 195–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grossi EA, Esposito R, Harries LJ, et al. Sternal wound infection and use of internal mammary artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 102: 342–347.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. William PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collin P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ, editors. Gray’s Anatomy. 38th ed. Edinburgh, London: ELBS with Churchill Livingstone; 1995p. 1534–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Puri D, Puri N, Gupta PK, Dhaliwal RS. Prevention of post operative phrenic nerve palsy in patients under cardiac surgery. Ind J of Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 17: 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Henriquez Pino JA, Gomes WJ, Buffolo E. Surgical Anatomy of the internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 1041–1045.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Calafiore AM, Contini M, Iaco AL, et al. Angiographic anatomy of the grafted left internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1636–1639.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tartini R, Steinbrunn W, Kappenberger L, Goebel N, Turina M. Anomalous origin of left thyrocervical trunk as a cause of residual pain after revascularisation with internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1985; 40: 302–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh RN. Radiographic anatomy of internal mammary artery. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1981; 7: 373–386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Owen WA, Gladstone DJ, Heylings DJ. Surgical anatomy of phrenic nerve and internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 843–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de Jesus RA, Acland RD. Anatomic study of blood supply of the sternum. Ann Thorac surg 1995; 59: 163–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berdajs D, Zund G, Turina MI, Genoni M. Blood supply of the sternum and its importance in internal thoracic artery harvesting. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 2155–2159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carrier M, Gregoire J, Tronc F, Cartier R, Leclerc Y, Pelletier IC. Effect of internal mammary artery dissection on sternal vascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1992, 53: 115–119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Seyfer AE, Shriver CD, Miller TR, Graeber GM. Sternal blood flow after median sternotomy and mobilization of the internal mammary arteries. Surgery 1988; 104: 899–904.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Arnold M. The surgical anatomy of sternal blood supply. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1972; 64: 596–610.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Puri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puri, N., Gupta, P.K., Mahant, T.S. et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting; anatomical variations to be considered. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23, 192–196 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-007-0036-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-007-0036-3

Key words

Navigation