Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle energy of AAC masonry infilled residential building in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Embodied energy plays an important role in the choice of building materials and is directly related to the sustainability of the built environment. Although autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry is gaining popularity in reinforced concrete (RC) framed buildings due to its various advantages, the issue of embodied energy of such buildings has not received adequate research attention. This paper evaluates the initial embodied energy of a typical AAC block masonry infilled RC framed building and compares it with that of an identical building infilled with traditional fired clay brick masonry. The results show that using AAC block masonry instead of fired clay brick masonry reduces material flow and the material embodied energy of the building by 13% and 18%, respectively. In addition, it also evaluates the life cycle energy of the selected building with AAC block masonry infill using the life cycle assessment method. The calculated life cycle energy of the AAC block masonry infilled RC framed buildings contributes to the knowledge database. This study concludes that the use of AAC block masonry instead of fired clay brick masonry in RC framed buildings increases the sustainability of the built environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Aberilla, J. M., Gallego-Schmid, A., Stamford, L., & Azapagic, A. (2020). Environmental sustainability of cooking fuels in remote communities: Life cycle and local impacts. Science of the Total Environment, 713, 136445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, R., & Shakya, S. R. (2008). Assessment of energy efficiency of a building through the choice of building materials for walls. 8th IOE Graduate Conference. Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Nepal, 8, 720–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adalberth, K. (1997). Energy use during the life cycle of single-unit dwellings: Examples. Building and Environment, 32(4), 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, M. R., Pan, Y., & Chen, B. (2021). Physical and mechanical properties of sustainable vegetal concrete exposed to extreme weather conditions. Construction and Building Materials, 287, 123024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aneesh, N. R., Shivaprasad, K. N., & Das, B. B. (2018). Life cycle energy analysis of a metro station building envelope through computer based simulation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, D., Singh, R., & Sawhney, R. L. (2014). Effect of construction materials on embodied energy and cost of buildings—A case study of residential houses in India up to 60 m2 of plinth area. Energy and Buildings, 69, 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, A. (2011). New Zealand fuel and electricity total primary energy and life cycle greenhouse gas emission factors 2010. Agrilink, Kumeu, New Zealand. https://agrilink.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Fuel_LCA_emission_factors_2011.pdf

  • Basha, S. H., & Kaushik, H. B. (2016). Suitability of fly ash brick masonry as infill in reinforced concrete frames. Materials and Structures, 49(9), 3831–3845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj, B., & Kumar, P. (2019). Comparative study of geopolymer and alkali activated slag concrete comprising waste foundry sand. Construction and Building Materials, 209, 555–565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee, S., Basavaraj, A. S., Rahul, A. V., Santhanam, M., Gettu, R., Panda, B., & Mechtcherine, V. (2021). Sustainable materials for 3D concrete printing. Cement and Concrete Composites, 122, 104156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhosale, A., Zade, N. P., Davis, R., & Sarkar, P. (2019). Experimental investigation of autoclaved aerated concrete masonry. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31(7), 04019109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhosale, A., Zade, N. P., Sarkar, P., & Davis, R. (2020). Mechanical and physical properties of cellular lightweight concrete block masonry. Construction and Building Materials, 248, 118621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bras, A., Ravijanya, C., de Sande, V. T., Riley, M., & Ralegaonkar, R. V. (2020). Sustainable and affordable prefab housing systems with minimal whole life energy use. Energy and Buildings, 220, 110030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. H., & Honey, B. G. (1994). Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction. Energy and Buildings, 20(3), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCAC Report. (2015). Mitigating black carbon and other pollutants from brick production. Climate and Clean Air Coalition, CCAC SECRETARIAT hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme, Paris, France. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://breathelife2030.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Fact-Sheet-5-Bricks-FINAL-Digital-May2015.pdf

  • Cherian, P., Palaniappan, S., Menon, D., & Anumolu, M. P. (2020). Comparative study of embodied energy of affordable houses made using GFRG and conventional building technologies in India. Energy and Buildings, 223, 110138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherian, P., Paul, S., Krishna, S. G., Menon, D., and Prasad, A. M. (2017). Mass housing using GFRG panels: A sustainable, rapid and affordable solution. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 98(1), 95–100.

  • CII. (2021). ‘GreenPro’ certified products, materials and technologies directory. 2nd ed. 2020-21, Confederation of Indian Industry, Sohrabji Godrej Green Business Centre, Hyderabad, India. Retrieved July 18, 2023, from https://ciigreenpro.com/uploads/newsletters/Directory%20on%20Green%20Products,%20Materials%20&%20Technology_2021.pdf

  • Cole, R. J. (1998). Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems. Building and Environment, 34(3), 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. J., & Kernan, P. C. (1996). Life-cycle energy use in office buildings. Building and Environment, 31(4), 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, S. P., & Dalal, P. (2021). Experimental investigation on strength and durability of graphene nanoengineered concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 276, 122236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath, A., Singh, S. V., & Singh, Y. P. (1995). Comparative assessment of energy requirements for different types of residential buildings in India. Energy and Buildings, 23(2), 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devi, P. L., & Palaniappan, S. (2014). A case study on life cycle energy use of residential building in Southern India. Energy and Buildings, 80, 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devi, P. L., & Palaniappan, S. (2018). Life cycle energy analysis of a low-cost house in India. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 15(4), 256–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, R., Treloar, G., & Iyer-Raniga, U. (2000). Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: A case study. Building Research & Information, 28(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, G., & Kalamdhad, A. S. (2017). Degraded municipal solid waste as partial substitute for manufacturing fired bricks. Construction and Building Materials, 155, 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, G. P., & Jones, C. I. (2008). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy, 161(2), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, N., & Pearlmutter, D. (2008). A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert. Energy and Buildings, 40(5), 837–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFC. (2017). India construction materials database of embodied energy and global warming potential, Methodology report, International Finance corporation, World bank group, Washington, D.C., U.S.

  • IS 456. (2000). Plain and Reinforced Concrete  Code of Practice.  Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, p. 114.

  • IS 1893-1:2016. (2016). Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures-Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, p. 44.

  • Islam, S. (2020). Eco-friendly AAC blocks for construction in smart cities. 3rd Smart Cities Symposium. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, London, United Kingdom.

  • ISO 14044. (2006). Environmental management  Life cycle assessment  Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Jain, U., Jain, M., & Mandaokar, S. (2018). Comparative study of AAC blocks and clay brick and costing. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 1(9), 539–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jami, T. (2021). Are AAC blocks really green? GreenJams, Andhra Pradesh, India. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://www.greenjams.org/post/are-aac-blocks-really-green

  • Johnstone, I. M. (2001). Energy and mass flows of housing: A model and example. Building and Environment, 36(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahhat, R., Crittenden, J., Sharif, F., Fonseca, E., Li, K., Sawhney, A., & Zhang, P. (2009). Environmental impacts over the life cycle of residential buildings using different exterior wall systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 15(3), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathirvel, P., & Sreekumaran, S. (2021). Sustainable development of ultra high performance concrete using geopolymer technology. Journal of Building Engineering, 39, 102267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik, H. B., Rai, D. C., & Jain, S. K. (2007). Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(9), 728–739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, A. E. (2020). Impact of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) on modern constructions: A case study in the new Egyptian administrative capital, Master’s thesis, Construction Engineering Department, The American University in Cairo (AUC), Egypt. Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/804

  • KPMG Report. (2017). Human resource and skill requirements in the construction material and building hardware sector. A Report Prepared by National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC), Government of India Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship, New Delhi, India. https://skillsip.nsdcindia.org/sites/default/files/kps-document/Construction-Material-Building-Hardware.pdf

  • Mahboob, M., Ali, M., Rashid, T. U., & Hassan, R. (2021). Assessment of embodied energy and environmental impact of sustainable building materials and technologies for residential sector. Engineering Proceedings, 12(1), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, T., Greenough, R., Taylor, S., Ozawa-Meida, L., & Acquaye, A. (2013). Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings - A review of current trends. Energy and Buildings, 66, 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayaka, R. R., Alengaram, U. J., Jumaat, M. Z., Fonseca, F. S., & Banerjee, A. (2021). Structural performance of masonry prisms, wallettes and walls containing high volume of industrial by-products–Sustainable housing perspective. Construction and Building Materials, 303, 124439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nizam, R. S., Xiao, Y., Zhang, T., Liu, Y., & Zhang, C. (2017). Simulating total embodied energy of building products through BIM. Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2017, pp. 2394–2404. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2017.8247969

  • Praseeda, K. I., Reddy, B. V., & Mani, M. (2015). Embodied energy assessment of building materials in India using process and input–output analysis. Energy and Buildings, 86, 677–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praseeda, K. I., Reddy, B. V., & Mani, M. (2016). Embodied and operational energy of urban residential buildings in India. Energy and Buildings, 110, 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, S. F. (2000). Energy used in the construction and operation of houses. Architectural Science Review, 43(2), 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, A. (2020). Strength Enhancement of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) Block and its Masonry. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/443969

  • Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1592–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2012). Life cycle approach in evaluating energy performance of residential buildings in Indian context. Energy and Buildings, 54, 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran, S. S. (2009). Design provisions for autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) infilled steel moment frames. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/7529

  • Reddy, B. V., & Jagadish, K. S. (2003). Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energy and Buildings, 35(2), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, B. V., & Kumar, P. P. (2010). Embodied energy in cement stabilised rammed earth walls. Energy and Buildings, 42(3), 380–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, B. V., Leuzinger, G., & Sreeram, V. S. (2014). Low embodied energy cement stabilised rammed earth building—A case study. Energy and Buildings, 68, 541–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, S. K., Mohapatra, B. G., Patro, S. K., & Acharya, P. K. (2021). Evaluation of graded layer in ground granulated blast furnace slag based layered concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 276, 122218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu, R. K., & Siddique, R. (2021). Properties of sustainable self-compacting concrete made with rice husk ash. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 26(13), 6670–6694. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2021.1955747

  • Sartori, I., & Hestnes, A. G. (2007). Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article. Energy and Buildings, 39(3), 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, R., Bhattacharya, S. P., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2021). Are low-income mass housing envelops energy efficient and comfortable? A multi-objective evaluation in warm-humid climate. Energy and Buildings, 245, 111055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Shree, V., & Nautiyal, H. (2012). Life cycle environmental assessment of an educational building in Northern India: A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 4, 22–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, A., Tiwari, G. N., & Sodha, M. S. (2009). Embodied energy analysis of adobe house. Renewable Energy, 34(3), 755–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srividya, T., PR, K. R., Sivasakthi, M., Sujitha, A., & Jeyalakshmi, R. (2022). A state-of-the-art on development of geopolymer concrete and its field applications. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanuj, V., Khitoliya, R. K., & Singh, A. J. (2014). An evaluative study on energy efficient building materials. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, 03(08), 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utama, A., & Gheewala, S. H. (2009). Indonesian residential high rise buildings: A life cycle energy assessment. Energy and Buildings, 41(11), 1263–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, A., Ouellet-Plamondon, C., Röck, M., Hecht, T., Roy, V., Higuera, P., Lecompte, T., Faria, P., Hamard, E., Morel, J. C., & Habert, G. (2022). Environmental potential of earth-based building materials: Key facts and issues from a life cycle assessment perspective. Testing and Characterisation of Earth-based Building Materials and Elements: State-of-the-Art Report of the RILEM TC 274-TCE, 261-296, Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83297-1_8

  • Zade, N. P., Sarkar, P., & Davis, R. (2023). Current status and future challenges of autoclave aerated concrete masonry. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 28(3), 03123002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha, 769008, India

    Nikhil P. Zade & Pradip Sarkar

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Kerala, 673601, India

    Robin Davis

Authors
  1. Nikhil P. Zade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pradip Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robin Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikhil P. Zade.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zade, N.P., Sarkar, P. & Davis, R. Life cycle energy of AAC masonry infilled residential building in India. Energy Efficiency 17, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-024-10188-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-024-10188-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation