Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of China’s carbon-reduction policies on provincial industrial competitiveness

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China has gradually strengthened its carbon-reduction policies and measures in recent years. However, the impact of China’s carbon policy on regional industrial competitiveness has received little attention. This paper proposed a method for calculating the intensity of carbon-reduction policies, and empirically analyzed the impact of China’s carbon-reduction policy on provincial industrial competitiveness by using a panel regression model, and compared differences carbon policy impacting on competitiveness in three regions (East, Central, and West China) as well as four types of industry. Overall, the findings revealed that China’s carbon-reduction policy harmed provincial industrial competitiveness (PIC). The carbon emission trading policy had a generally positive impact on PIC. The negative effect of carbon-reduction policies on industrial competitiveness in the eastern regions was relatively significant, while relatively minor in the central regions. The positive impact of the carbon emission trading policy on the industrial competitiveness of eastern regions was rather substantial, while it was relatively small in the western areas. The carbon-reduction policy harmed the provincial competitiveness of extractive industries, low-energy-consuming industries, and high-tech manufacturing industries. However, there was no discernible impact on high-energy-consuming industries. Finally, the carbon trading policy improved the provincial competitiveness of high energy-consuming industries. This research can aid in the optimization of China’s carbon-reduction policy, as well as the coordination of provincial industrial development and the balance of different industrial development strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this paper, provinces refer to administrative planning areas at the provincial level in China, including provinces, municipalities directly under the central government, and ethnic minority autonomous regions.

References

  • Ai, H., Xiong, S., Li, K., Jia, P., 2020. Electricity price and industrial green productivity: Does the “low-electricity price trap” exist? Energy, 207(118239). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118239.

  • Aiken, D. V., Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. A. (2009). Pollution abatement and productivity growth: Evidence from Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(1), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arouri, M. E. H., Caporale, G. M., Rault, C., Sova, R., & Sova, A. (2012). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Evidence from Romania. Ecological Economics, 81, 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babool, A., & Reed, M. (2010). The impact of environmental policy on international competitiveness in manufacturing. Applied Economics, 42(18), 2317–2326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L Bocci P D’Urso D Vicari V Vitale 2021 A three-way approach for defining competitiveness indexes of the European regions (NUTS-2) Social Indicators Research 1–45 https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-021-02839-9

  • Chen, H., & Chen, G. (2002). Evaluation model and case analysis of regional industrial competitiveness. China Soft Science, 01, 100–105. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., & Tan, L. (2004). Research on the empirical method of evaluating the international competitiveness of Chinese manufacturing: Compared with Porter’s index and industrial classification. China Industrial Economy, 05, 30–37. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Wang, X., & Rao, S. (2009). Comparison of international competitiveness of Chinese and American manufacturing industries: An empirical analysis based on the perspective of industrial competitiveness. China Industrial Economy, 06, 57–66. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, H., Li, F., & Mao, Q. (2015). The empirical analysis on the influence of CO2 emission regulation on the export transformation of Chinese manufacturing industries. Journal of Coastal Research, 73, 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhri, E. U., & Schembri, L. L. (2002). Productivity performance and international competitiveness: An old test reconsidered. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(2), 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. A., & Elliott, R. J. R. (2003). Determining the trade–environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 363–383.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J. R., & Shimamoto, K. (2005). Why the grass is not always greener: The competing effects of environmental regulations and factor intensities on US specialization. Ecological Economics, 54(1), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2012). The curse of the haven: The impact of multinational enterprise on environmental regulation. Ecological Economics, 78, 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Mody, A., Roy, S., & Wheeler, D. (2001). Environmental regulation and development: A cross-country empirical analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 29(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, C., Lanoie, P., & Patry, M. (1998). Regulation and productivity. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9(3), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, J., & Li, L. (2010). Empirical research on environmental regulation, factor endowment and industrial international competitiveness: Based on panel data of Chinese manufacturing. Management World, 10, 87–98. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, M., Salini, S., & Verdolini, E. (2020). Measuring environmental policy stringency: Approaches, validity, and impact on environmental innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 136(C), 111052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. J. (1998). Environmental regulation, investment timing, and technology choice. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. J. (2003). Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 384–402.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. N., Konya, L., & Matyas, L. (2002). Modelling the impact of environmental regulations on bilateral trade flows: OECD, 1990–1996. The World Economy, 25(3), 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. H., Sun, S., & Dai, Y. X. (2021). Environmental regulation, green innovation, and international competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises in China: From the perspective of heterogeneous regulatory tools. PLoS ONE, 16(3), 0249169. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0249169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Kanagawa: The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (Japan).

  • Iraldo, F., Testa, F., Melis, M., & Frey, M. (2011). A literature review on the links between environmental regulation and competitiveness. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21(3), 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B. S., & Wei, S.-J. (2003). Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: Dirty secret or popular myth? Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(2).

  • Johansson, B. (2006). Climate policy instruments and industry–Effects and potential responses in the Swedish context. Energy Policy, 34(15), 2344–2360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorge, M. L., Madueño, J. H., Martínez-Martínez, D., & Sancho, M. P. L. (2015). Competitiveness and environmental performance in Spanish small and medium enterprises: Is there a direct link? Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S., & Albaladejo, M. (2004). China’s competitive performance: A threat to East Asian manufactured exports? World Development, 32(9), 1441–1466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. (2008). Environmental regulations and market power: The case of the Korean manufacturing industries. Ecological Economics, 68(1), 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International Economic Review, 49(1), 223–254.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li X. Y., Xue W. H., Wang K., Che Y. F., Wei J. 2022. Environmental regulation and synergistic effects of PM2.5 control in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.130438.

  • Liu X. M., Zhang W., Liu X. R., Li H. (2022). The impact assessment of FDI on industrial green competitiveness in China: Based on the perspective of FDI heterogeneity. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2022(93). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2021.106720.

  • Liu, Y., & Zhou, M. (2018). Will environmental regulation hinder firms’ competitiveness? A general equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms. The Journal of World Economy, 41(04), 150–167. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, R. D., Ho, M., Shih, J.-S.J.-S., & Zhang, X. (2004). The near-term impacts of carbon mitigation policies on manufacturing industries. Energy Policy, 32(16), 1825–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of ecology and environment of China. (2019).Press conference on China’s climate change policy and action 2019 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-11/27/content_5456146.htm. (In Chinese).

  • Naughton, H. T. (2014). To shut down or to shift: Multinationals and environmental regulation. Ecological Economics, 102(6), 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nirmalkumar, S. M., & Barnali, N. (2022). Measuring regional competitiveness on the basis of entrepreneurship, technological readiness and quality of institutions. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 32(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2020-0139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple repressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: the Free Press, 855pp.

  • Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 28(6), 128-129 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995b). Towards a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(4), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simionescu, M., Pelinescu, E., Khouri, S., & Bilan, S. (2021). The main drivers of competitiveness in the EU-28 countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.7441/JOC.2021.01.08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavropoulos, S., Wall, R., & Xu, Y. (2018). Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1378–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, X., Dai, H., Geng, Y., Huang, Z., Masui, T., & Fujita, T. (2017). The effects of carbon reduction on sectoral competitiveness in China: A case of Shanghai. Applied Energy, 197, 270–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triebswetter, U., & Hitchens, D. (2005). The impact of environmental regulation on competitiveness in the German manufacturing industry: A comparison with other countries of the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(7), 733–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, I., & Ugelow, J. (1979). Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio, 8(23), 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, H., & Wu, L. (2002). Evaluation of industrial competitiveness in China. China Industrial Economy, 11, 54–62. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. T., Hao, Y., & Ren, S. Y. (2020a). How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: Evidence from China? Energy Economics, 91, 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. T., Xu, L., Ren, S. Y., Hao, Y., & Yan, G. Y. (2020). How do energy consumption and environmental regulation affect carbon emissions in China? New evidence from a dynamic threshold panel model. Resources Policy (C), 67(C), 101678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, E. (2008). Environmental regulation and China’s industrial productivity growth. Industrial Economics Research, 01, 19–25. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, R., Yuan, Y., & Huang, J. (2017). Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: Evidence from China. Ecological Economics, 132, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing, Y., & Kolstad, C. D. (2002). Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment? Environmental and Resource Economics, 21(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, G., & Jiang, C. (2001). Research on the evaluation index system of regional industry international competitiveness. Scientific Management Research, 19(6), 24–27. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. X., Feng, C., Hu, Y., & Wei, X. (2015). Environmental regulation and fossil energy consumption: Based on the perspective of technological progress and economic structure transformation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 25(12), 35–44. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, B., Zhang, M., Huang, L., Wang, P., Su, B., & Wei, Y. M. (2020). Exploring the effect of carbon trading mechanism on China’s green development efficiency: A novel integrated approach. Energy Economics(C), 85, 104601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104601

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

All of the sources of funding for the work described in this publication are acknowledged below: This research was fully supported by the Think Tank of Energy Mining Economy (2018 Project for Cultural Evolution and Creation of CUMT 2018WHCC01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q. R. Cao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, Q.R., Zhou, S.Y., Sajid, M.J. et al. The impact of China’s carbon-reduction policies on provincial industrial competitiveness. Energy Efficiency 15, 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-022-10040-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-022-10040-1

Keywords

Navigation