Abstract
Among all its effects, the development of the boundary layer, its separation, and formation of the wake region could lead to higher convective heat transfer over the body, if the flow conditions cause high gradient velocity profiles in the surface vicinities of the field. And also, a low-pressure region in the downstream of the geometry is formed, which increases the pressure drag exerted on it. The influence of the aforementioned issue on the zero energy house design has been tackled by introducing a new flow control mechanism. The so-called flow controlling blades (FCBs) were recently designed and investigated on a smart sustainable house, in order to control the flow field around the house, prevent the separation, and decrease the wake intensity, targeting a lower level of convective heat loss and drag force exerted on the body. The angular orientation of these FCBs was formerly determined for 12 different free wind directions (30° increments), as a look-up table for the main control system of the house. To increase the resolution of the orientations, we make use of a recently successful tool in machine learning called neural networks to estimate the desired orientation of the blades for the wind directions that do not exist in the said look-up table. Consequently, all the sample investigated sub-intervals not originally covered by the CFD data, showing great coincidence with the data driven from the neural network utilized in this study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amini, K., Mortazavi, S. M., Rezaian, E., & Amir, F. (2019). Najafi, “Numerical investigation on the convection heat transfer and drag reduction by utilizing a novel idea of flow controlling blades designed and analyzed for a smart sustainable house” the journal of Energy Efficiency. Springer, 12(3), 757–776.
Awol, A., Bitsuamlak, G. T., & Tariku, F. (2020). Numerical estimation of the external convective heat transfer coefficient for buildings in an urban-like setting. Building and Environment, 169, 106557.
Bechtler, H., Browne, M. W., Bansal, P. K., & Kecman, V. (2001). Neural networks-a new approach to model vapour-compression heat pumps. International Journal of Energy Research, 25(7), 591–599.
Colucci, C., Mauri, L., Grignaffini, S., Romagna, M., Cedola, L., & Kanna, R. (2017). Influence of the façades convective heat transfer coefficients on the thermal energy demand for an urban street canyon building. Energy Procedia, 126, 10–17.
Emmel, M. G., Abadie, M. O., & Mendes, N. (2007). New external convective heat transfer coefficient correlations for isolated low-rise buildings. Energy and Buildings, 39(3), 335–342.
Ertunc, H. M., & Hosoz, M. (2006). Artificial neural network analysis of a refrigeration system with an evaporative condenser. Applied Thermal Engineering, 26(5–6), 627–635.
Goldstein, R. J., Ibele, W. E., Patankar, S. V., Simon, T. W., Kuehn, T. H., Strykowski, P. J., Tamma, K. K., Heberlein, J. V. R., Davidson, J. H., Bischof, J., Kulacki, F. A., Kortshagen, U., Garrick, S., Srinivasan, V., Ghosh, K., & Mittal, R. (2010). Heat transfer—a review of 2005 literature. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 53, Elsevier Publisher, 4397–4447.
Z.H. Han, S. Zhang, W.P. Song, D. Qiao, Optimization of active flow control over an airfoil using surrogate management framework, in: 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, Florida, 5–8 January 2009, AIAA Paper 2009-1280.
Hikmet, E., & Mustafa, I. (2009). Modelling of a vertical ground coupled heat pump system by using artificial neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(7), 10229–10238.
Hunt, J. C. R., Abell, C. J., Peterka, J. A., & Woo, H. (1978). Kinematical studies of the flow around free or surface-mounted obstacles; applying topology to flow visualization. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 86, 179–200.
Islamoglu, Y. (2005). Performance prediction for non-adiabatic capillary tube suction-line heat exchanger: an artificial neural network approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 46(2), 223–232.
Jordan, S. A. (2002). Investigation of the cylinder separated shear-layer physics by LES. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 23, Elsevier Publisher, 1–12.
Kahsay, M. T., Bitsuamlak, G. T., & Tariku, F. (2019). CFD simulation of external CHTC on a high-rise building with and without façade appurtenances. Building and Environment, 165, 106350.
Kim, M. Y., Charles, P. G., & Christopher, Y. C. (2010). Assessment of physically-based and data-driven models to predict microbial water quality in open channels. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 22(6), 851–857.
Kumar, A., & Hefner, J. N. Future challenges and opportunities in aerodynamics. VA: NASA Langley Research Center Hampton.
Li, N., Liang, X., Deng, S., Xu, X., & Chan, M.-Y. (2012). Steady-state operating performance modeling and prediction for a direct expansion air conditioning system using artificial neural network. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 33, 281–292.
Menter, F. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8), 1598–1605.
Montazeri, H., & Blocken, B. (2017). New generalized expressions for forced convective heat transfer coefficients at building facades and roofs. Building and Environment, 119, 153–168.
Montazeri, H., & Blocken, B. (2018). Extension of generalized forced convective heat transfer coefficient expressions for isolated buildings taking into account oblique wind directions. Building and Environment, 140, 194–208.
Mustafaraj, G., & Chen, J. (2009). G Lowry BA PhD CEng MEI, “Thermal behaviour model identification for an office space using BMS data”. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 30, 329–341.
Naghib-Lahouti, A., & Hangan, H. (2010). Active flow control for reduction of fluctuating aerodynamic forces of a blunt leading edge profiled body. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 31, Elsevier Publisher, 1096–1106.
Polezhaev, V. I., Myakshina, M. N., & Nikitin, S. A. (2012). Heat transfer due to buoyancy-driven convective interaction in enclosures: fundamentals and applications. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 55, Elsevier Publisher, 156–165.
Richards, P. J., & Hoxey, R. P. (2012). Pressures on a cubic building—part 2: quasi-steady and other processes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 102, Elsevier Publisher;, 87–96.
Salque, T., Marchio, D., & Riederer, P. (2014). Neural predictive control for single-speed ground source heat pumps connected to a floor heating system for typical French dwelling. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 35(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624413480370.
Schlichting, H., & Gersten, K. (2006). Grenzschicht Theorie (10th ed.). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Scott Collis, S., Joslin, R. D., Seifert, A., & Theofilis, V. (2004). Issues in active flow control theory, control, simulation, and experiment. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 40, Elsevier Publisher, 237–289.
Sozen, A., Arcaklioglu, E., & Ozalp, M. (2003). A new approach to thermodynamic analysis of ejector-absorption cycle: artificial neural networks. Applied Thermal Engineering, 23(8), 937–952.
Sun, Y., Wang, S., & Huang, G. (2010). Model-based optimal start control strategy for multi-chiller plants in commercial buildings. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 113–129.
Wilcox, D. C. (1993). Turbulence Modeling for CFD’. La Canada, CA: DCW Industries, Inc.
Xie, G. N., Wang, Q. W., Zeng, M., & Luo, L. Q. (2007). Heat transfer analysis for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with experimental data by artificial neural networks approach. Applied Thermal Engineering, 27(5–6), 1096–1104.
Yagiz, B., Kandil, O., & Pehlivanoglu, Y. V. (2012). Drag minimization using active and passive flow control techniques. Aerospace Science and Technology, 17, Elsevier Publisher, 21–31.
Yang, W., Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2017). Annual experimental research on convective heat transfer coefficient of exterior surface of building external wall. Energy and Buildings, 155(15), 207–214.
N. Yeshala, B. Min, L.N. Sankar (2008). Drag reduction studies using active flow control, in: 4th AIAA Flow Control Conference, Washington, DC, AIAA Paper 2008-3870.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Note to practitioners
This research was motivated by recent growth of attention to smart buildings with efficient use of energy. In the context of the global energy crisis, this falls in the realm of efficient and sustainable design. Controlling boundary layers around the house is a solution for managing energy loss through the walls. The boundary layer separation should be controllable to react to the atmospheric changes at the location of the building. Controllability means the orientation of the flow controlling blades must be decided based on the direction of wind around the house. Computer simulation gives rough estimate of the proper orientation of the components for a number of wind directions. However, due to the immense cost of simulations, the orientation of the FCBs for many wind directions will be left undecided. To enhance the resolution of the controller, we make use of an approximator that predicts a decent value of the FCB orientation for wind directions between two simulated conditions. This can allow the building controller to decide for every direction of wind which has not been simulated in advance. In this research, we rely merely on the simulation to develop the predictor of the FCB orientations. In the future, it would be fruitful to incorporate the knowledge of the field engineers into the approximator. This can reduce the need for simulation data and decrease the computational burden of the method.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amini, K., Mehrjou, A. & Mani, M. Enhancing the resolution of the angular orientations of the flow controlling blades on a sustainable house by training an artificial neural network. Energy Efficiency 14, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-021-09931-6
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-021-09931-6