Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Market segmentation and energy efficiency—an empirical study based on China’s provincial panel data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the perspective of market segmentation, this paper empirically tests the impact mechanism of market segmentation on energy efficiency by using China’s provincial panel data from 2005 to 2016. The results show that market segmentation has a significant inhibitory effect on energy efficiency by distorting technological progress, scale efficiency, and allocation efficiency. The conclusion of this paper not only provides an important theoretical basis for promoting the reform of China’s economic system, but also brings some enlightenment for other developing countries to choose ways to improve energy efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Referring to Farrell (1957), this paper will not introduce the specific calculation model.

  2. Data from the website of the National Bureau of Statistics of China

References

  • Amore, M. D., Schneider, C., & Žaldokas, A. (2013). Credit supply and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), 835–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, B. W., & Wang, H. (2015). Index decomposition analysis with multidimensional and multilevel energy data. Energy Economics, 51(9), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arriola-Medellín, A. M., López-Cisneros, L. F., Aragón-Aguilar, A., Romo-Millares, C. A., & Fernández-Montiel, M. F. (2019). Energy efficiency to increase production and quality of products in industrial processes: case study oil and gas processing center. Energy Efficiency, 12(6), 1619–1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, W., Huang, W., & Yang, Z. (2011). Bank loans with Chinese characteristics: some evidence on inside debt in a state-controlled banking system. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1795–1830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgen, S., Keles, S., & Kaygusuz, K. (2007). The role of biomass in greenhouse gas mitigation. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 29(13), 1243–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, G. B., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China’s thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66(3), 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, R. A. (2014). Cross-border mergers and market segmentation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 62(2), 229–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Sun, Z., Tang, S., & Wu, D. (2011). Government intervention and investment efficiency: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. Y. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120(3), 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Liao, H., & Wei, Y. M. (2007). Can market oriented economic reforms contribute to energy efficiency improvement? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 35(4), 2287–2295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, T., Sun, L., & Zhang, Y. (2009). The relationship between energy consumption structure, economic structure and energy intensity in China. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5475–5483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher-Vanden, K., Jefferson, G. H., Liu, H., et al. (2004). What is driving China’s decline in energy intensity? Resource and Energy Economics, 26(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giloni, A., Seshadri, S., & Tucci, C. L. (2010). Neo-Rawlsian fringes: a new approach to market segmentation and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q. H., Chen, M., Lu, M., et al. (2006). China’s domestic commodity market tends to be segmented or integrated: an analysis based on the relative price method. The Journal of World Economy, 2, 20–30. (in Chinese).

  • Hou, K., & Robinson, D. T. (2006). Industry concentration and average stock returns. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1927–1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, L., Shen, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 206(1), 1115–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. B., & Andersson, B. (1993). Market barriers to energy efficiency. Energy Economics, 15(4), 262–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. L., & Wang, S. C. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 34(17), 3206–3217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • János, K., Eric, M., & Gérard, R. (2003). Understanding the soft budget constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1095–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., & Lin, B. (2014). The nonlinear impacts of industrial structure on China’s energy intensity. Energy, 69, 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., & Lin, B. (2015). Metafroniter energy efficiency with CO2 emissions and its convergence analysis for China. Energy Economics, 48(3), 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa, M. (2012). Population density and efficiency in energy consumption: an empirical analysis of service establishments. Energy Economics, 34(5), 1617–1622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishioka, Y., Levy, J. I., Norris, G. A., Wilson, A., Hofstetter, P., & Spengler, J. D. (2002). Integrating risk assessment and life cycle assessment: a case study of insulation. Risk Analysis, 22(5), 1003–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2005). A global Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters, 88(2), 266–271.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. G. (1996). What is energy efficiency?: concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy, 24(5), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. I. (2012). Modeling international trends in energy efficiency. Energy Economics, 34(6), 2200–2208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Unachukwu, G. O. (2011). Potential economic and social benefits of promoting energy efficiency measures in Nigeria. Energy Efficiency, 4(4), 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. Q. (2013). Scenario-based energy efficiency and productivity in China: a non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energy Economics, 40(11), 795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C., Ni, J., & Sheng, M. (2011). China’s energy inefficiency: a cross-country comparison. The Social Science Journal, 48(3), 478–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Masui, T. (2009). Local air pollutant emission reduction and ancillary carbon benefits of SO2 control policies: application of AIM/CGE model to China. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(1), 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F., Guo, Y., Le-Nguyen, K., et al. (2016). The impact of government subsidies and enterprises’ R&D investment: a panel data study from renewable energy in China. Energy Policy, 89(2), 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L. (2008). Impacts of food and energy price hikes and proposed coping strategies. China & World Economy, 16(6), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. P., & Cheng, X. M. (2009). Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2706–2712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2013). Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy, 57(6), 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Hong Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 49 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, XF., Zhou, LH. Market segmentation and energy efficiency—an empirical study based on China’s provincial panel data. Energy Efficiency 13, 1781–1797 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09908-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09908-x

Keywords

Navigation