Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A long-term meta-frontier analysis of energy and emission efficiencies between G7 and BRICS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current concern over energy utilization and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions can be surveyed by investigating potential energy savings and potential emissions reduction in order to emit less greenhouse gases (GHG), thus allowing countries to create economic growth while at the same time preventing global warming and mitigating climate change. The main objective of this paper is to analyze long-term potential energy savings, potential emissions reduction, and long-term technology gaps on energy utilization and CO2 emissions in G7 and BRICS during 2000–2014. The paper also sets up an index to measure convergence or divergence in the technology gaps on energy utilization and CO2 emissions. The results conclude that the UK, Italy, and France have the smallest overall technology gap, while the largest overall technology gap appears in South Africa, Russia, and the USA. To this end, the technology gap on energy utilization in BRICS is improving in recent years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baležentis, T., Li, T., Streimikiene, D., & Baležentis, A. (2016). Is the Lithuanian economy approaching the goals of sustainable energy and climate change mitigation? Evidence from DEA-based environmental performance index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., Rao, D. P., & O’Donnell, C. J. (2004). A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. C. (2015). Room for improvement in low carbon economies of G7 and BRICS countries based on the analysis of energy efficiency and environmental Kuznets curves. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 140–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. C., Hu, J. L., & Jan, F. G. (2016). Performance estimation of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions for sustainable development in Baltic Sea countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1370–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y., Zhang, N., & Zhou, P. (2012). Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Applied Energy, 98, 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Castro Camioto, F., Moralles, H. F., Mariano, E. B., & do Nascimento Rebelatto, D. A. (2016). Energy efficiency analysis of G7 and BRICS considering total-factor structure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewertowska, A., Galán-Martín, A., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Gavaldá, J., & Jiménez, L. (2016). Assessment of the environmental efficiency of the electricity mix of the top European economies via data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana, L., Cunado, J., & Gupta, R. (2016). Persistence, mean-reversion and non-linearities in CO2 emissions: evidence from the BRICS and G7 countries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, X. D., Zhu, L., Fan, Y., & Xie, B. C. (2011). Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA. Energy Policy, 39, 2352–2360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. L., & Wang, S. C. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 34, 3206–3217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iftikhar, Y., He, W., & Wang, Z. (2016). Energy and CO2 emissions efficiency of major economies: a non-parametric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 779–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kılkış, Ş. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation system analyses of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey and Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 130, 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kounetas, K. (2015). Heterogeneous technologies, strategic groups and environmental efficiency technology gaps for European countries. Energy Policy, 83, 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. W. (2013). The contribution of foreign direct investment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy, 55, 483–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., & Lin, B. (2015). Metafroniter energy efficiency with CO2 emissions and its convergence analysis for China. Energy Economics, 48, 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Du, K. (2013). Technology gap and China’s regional energy efficiency: a parametric metafrontier approach. Energy Economics, 40, 529–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa, G., & Mahmood, M. (2015). The rise of the BRICS and their challenge to the G7. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10, 156–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, C. J., Rao, D. P., & Battese, G. E. (2008). Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Economics, 34, 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 38, 7850–7860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011). Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36, 685–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi, K., Shabani, A., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2015). Using data envelopment analysis for estimating energy saving and undesirable output abatement: a case study in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana, N. B., Aparecida do Nascimento Rebelatto, D., Périco, A. E., & Mariano, E. B. (2014). Sustainable development in the BRICS countries: an efficiency analysis by data envelopment. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 21, 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana, N. B., Mariano, E. B., Camioto, F. D. C., & Rebelatto, D. A. D. N. (2015b). National innovative capacity as determinant in sustainable development: a comparison between the BRICS and G7 countries. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 9, 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana, N. B., Rebelatto, D. A. D. N., Périco, A. E., Moralles, H. F., & Filho, L. W. (2015a). Technological innovation for sustainable development: an analysis of different types of impacts for countries in the BRICS and G7 groups. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 22, 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz, M., Rasool, G., Ahmed, K., & Mahalik, M. K. (2016). Considering the effect of biomass energy consumption on economic growth: fresh evidence from BRICS region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1442–1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. L., Zhang, L. L., Liu, W., & Fisher, R. (2013). Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’ energy efficiency based on small sample data. Applied Energy, 112, 1049–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2011). Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 684–693.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, C. J., Chang, M. C., & Chen, C. P. (2016). Progressive time-weighted dynamic energy efficiency, energy decoupling rate, and decarbonization: an empirical study on G7 and BRICS. Sustainability, 8, 928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tugcu, C. T., & Tiwari, A. K. (2016). Does renewable and/or non-renewable energy consumption matter for total factor productivity (TFP) growth? Evidence from the BRICS. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 610–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., & Feng, C. (2015a). Sources of production inefficiency and productivity growth in China: a global data envelopment analysis. Energy Economics, 49, 380–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., & Feng, C. (2015b). A performance evaluation of the energy, environmental, and economic efficiency and productivity in China: an application of global data envelopment analysis. Applied Energy, 147, 617–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Feng, C., & Zhang, B. (2014). An empirical analysis of China’s energy efficiency from both static and dynamic perspectives. Energy, 74, 322–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Su, B., Sun, J., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. (2015a). Measurement and decomposition of energy-saving and emissions reduction performance in Chinese cities. Applied Energy, 151, 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Zhao, Z., Shen, N., & Liu, T. (2015b). Have Chinese cities achieved the win-win between environmental protection and economic development? From the perspective of environmental efficiency. Ecological Indicators, 51, 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute. (2014). Global emissions of CO 2 from fossil fuels: 1900–2004. Downloaded from http://www.wri.org/resources/charts-graphs/global-emissions-co2-fossil-fuels-1900-2004. Accessed 23 Jan 2018.

  • Wu, Y. (2004). Openness, productivity and growth in the APEC economies. Empirical Economics, 29, 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Fan, L. W., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. Q. (2012). Industrial energy efficiency with CO2 emissions in China: a nonparametric analysis. Energy Policy, 49, 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, B. C., Shang, L. F., Yang, S. B., & Yi, B. W. (2014). Dynamic environmental efficiency evaluation of electric power industries: evidence from OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries. Energy, 74, 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, X., Zhou, H., Zhang, A., & Li, A. (2015). Regional energy efficiency, carbon emission performance and technology gaps in China: a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energy Policy, 84, 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakarya, G. Y., Mostefa, B., Abbes, S. M., & Seghir, G. M. (2015). Factors affecting CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries: a panel data analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., & Choi, Y. (2013a). Total-factor carbon emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China: a metafrontier non-radial Malmquist index analysis. Energy Economics, 40, 549–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., & Choi, Y. (2013b). A comparative study of dynamic changes in CO2 emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China and Korea. Energy Policy, 62, 324–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., & Choi, Y. (2014). A note on the evolution of directional distance function and its development in energy and environmental studies 1997-2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., Zhou, P., & Choi, Y. (2013). Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energy Policy, 56, 653–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2008). A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 1–18.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Wang, H. (2012). Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 221, 625–635.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank two anonymous referees of this journal for their valuable comments.

Funding

This study was financially supported by Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST105-2410-H-009-043).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marketing, Kainan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Ming-Chung Chang

  2. Institute of Business and Management, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

    Jin-Li Hu

Authors
  1. Ming-Chung Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jin-Li Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Li Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, MC., Hu, JL. A long-term meta-frontier analysis of energy and emission efficiencies between G7 and BRICS. Energy Efficiency 12, 879–893 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9696-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9696-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation