Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Energy efficiency, carbon dioxide emission efficiency, and related abatement costs in regional China: a synthesis of input–output analysis and DEA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to examine energy efficiency, carbon dioxide (CO2) emission efficiency, and related abatement costs of China’s regions in 2012 by considering embodied carbon caused by trade. To this end, a combined approach with environmentally extended input–output analysis (EEIO) and DEA is proposed. We first apply the EEIO model to measure CO2 emissions of 30 China’s regions from the consumption perspective, which can identify the described embodied carbon. According to the amounts of CO2 emissions with respect to the production-based and consumption-based principles, 30 regions are divided into two groups, i.e., emission-importing regions and emission-exporting regions. For emission-importing regions, CO2 emissions from the consumption perspective exceed that from the production-based perspective. The emission-exporting regions exhibit the opposite case. Our results show that energy efficiency and CO2 emission abatement costs will be underestimated in both groups when ignoring the embodied carbon emissions. The emission-importing regions evidence higher efficiency scores and abatement costs than those emission-exporting regions, and there is a significant difference between these two groups in terms of energy efficiency and CO2 emission efficiency, whereas there is no significant difference with respect to CO2 emission abatement costs. It is interesting that emission-exporting regions enjoy a slight increase in CO2 emission efficiency whereas emission-importing regions suffer from a decrease. Some useful policy implications are achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bi, G., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China’s thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66, 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Park, H., Jeong, J., & Lee, J. (2014). Evaluating economic and environmental efficiency of global airlines: A SBM-DEA approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 27, 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y., Zhang, N., & Zhou, P. (2012). Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure. Applied Energy, 98, 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Y., Zhu, Y., Bai, Q., Hu, X., & Yu, S. (2009). Chin’s low carbon development pathways by 2050. Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egilmez, G., Kucukvar, M., & Tatari, O. (2013). Sustainability assessment of US manufacturing sectors: An economic input output-based frontier approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 53, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., Hou, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, C., & Wei, Y. (2016). Exploring the characteristics of production-based and consumption-based carbon emissions of major economies: A multiple-dimension comparison. Applied Energy, 184, 790–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2004). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment. European Journal of Operational Research, 157(1), 242–245.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2009). A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43, 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., & Wang, S. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 34(17), 3206–3217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iftikhar, Y., He, W., & Wang, Z. (2016). Energy and CO2 emissions efficiency of major economies: A non-parametric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 779–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X., Duan, Y., & Green, C. (2017). Regional disparity in energy intensity of China and the role of industrial and export structure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Yoo, S. (2016). The role of transportation sectors in the Korean national economy: An input-output analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 93, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. The Review of Economic Statistics, 18(3), 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., & Hu, J. (2012). Ecological total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 46, 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Shi, J. (2014). Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors: An improved super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Mu, H., Zhang, M., & Gui, S. (2012). Analysis of regional difference on impact factors of China’s energy-related CO2 emissions. Energy, 39, 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Zhu, J. (2017). Energy and carbon intensity in China during the urbanization and industrialization process: A panel VAR approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 780–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Liang, Q., & Wang, Q. (2015). Accounting for China’s regional carbon emissions in 2002 and 2007: Production-based versus consumption-based principles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 384–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Zhao, G., & Zhao, Y. (2016). An analysis of Chinese provincial carbon dioxide emission efficiencies based on energy consumption structure. Energy Policy, 96, 524–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv, K., Yu, A., & Bian, Y. (2017). Regional energy efficiency and its determinants in China during 2001–2010: A slacks-based measure and spatial econometric analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 47(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mi, Z., Meng, J., Guan, D., Shan, Y., Song, M., Wei, Y., & Liu, Z. (2017). Chinese CO2 emission flows have reversed since the global financial crisis. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou, J., Meng, J., Zheng, J., Mi, Z., Bian, Y., Yu, X., Liu, J., & Guan, D. (2017). Demand-driven air pollutant emissions for a fast-developing region in China. Applied Energy, 204, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. P. (2008). From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 65(1), 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan, H. (2008). Re-estimating the capital stock of China: 1952–2006. Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics, 10, 17–31 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, G., Bi, J., & Wang, J. (2010). Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6172–6179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, B., & Ang, B. W. (2013). Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: Competitive versus non-competitive imports. Energy Policy, 56, 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, B., Ang, B. W., & Li, Y. (2017). Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore’s carbon emissions. Energy Policy, 105, 484–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, P., & Lin, B. (2017). Promoting green productivity growth for China’s industrial exports: Evidence from a hybrid input-output model. Energy Policy, 111, 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., & Wei, Y. (2014). China’s regional industrial energy efficiency and carbon emissions abatement costs. Applied Energy, 130, 617–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. (2012). Efficiency measurement with carbon dioxide emissions: The case of China. Applied Energy, 90, 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Bian, Y., & Xu, H. (2015). Water use efficiency and related pollutants’ abatement costs of regional industrial systems in China: A slacks-based measure approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Lv, K., Bian, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2017). Energy efficiency and marginal carbon dioxide emission abatement cost in urban China. Energy Policy, 105, 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C., Ni, J., & Du, L. (2012). Regional allocation of carbon dioxide abatement in China. China Economic Review, 23, 552–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2014). CO2 emissions. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.KT?view=chart.

  • Yan, H. (2015). Provincial energy intensity in China: The role of urbanization. Energy Policy, 86, 635–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (2013). The responsibility for carbon emissions and carbon efficiency at the sectoral level: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 40, 967–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (2015). Provincial responsibility for carbon emissions in China under different principles. Energy Policy, 86, 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., & Choi, Y. (2013). Environmental energy efficiency of China’s regional economies: A non-oriented slacks-based measure analysis. The Social Science Journal, 50(2), 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Xu, Q., Zhang, F., Guo, Z., & Rao, R. (2014). Exploring shadow prices of carbon emissions at provincial levels in China. Ecological Indicators, 46, 407–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2006). Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Fan, L., & Zhou, P. (2015). Marginal CO2 abatement costs: Findings from alternative shadow price estimates for Shanghai industrial sectors. Energy Policy, 77, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurano-Cervelló, P., Pozo, C., Mateo-Sanz, J. M., Jiménez, L., & Guillén-Gosálbez, G. (2017). Eco-efficiency assessment of EU manufacturing sectors combining input-output tables and data envelopment analysis following production and consumption-based accounting approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1161–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71503161, 71774108, 71371010) are gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank the editor and the two reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SHU-UTS SILC Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 201899, People’s Republic of China

    Yu Cheng, Kangjuan Lv & Jian Wang

  2. School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China

    Hao Xu

Authors
  1. Yu Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kangjuan Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hao Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Sectors for provincial IOTs and corresponding energy consumption
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Y., Lv, K., Wang, J. et al. Energy efficiency, carbon dioxide emission efficiency, and related abatement costs in regional China: a synthesis of input–output analysis and DEA. Energy Efficiency 12, 863–877 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9695-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9695-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation