Advertisement

Energy Efficiency

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 667–680 | Cite as

An experimental investigation of price elasticity in electricity markets using a response surface methodology

  • Abdullah Asuhaimi Bin Mohd Zin
  • Mehdi MoradiEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

For the purposes of government policy concerning energy security, optimal taxation, and climate change, precise estimates of the effective factors in price elasticity of electricity demand are of principal importance. In this regard, this paper explores the effect of different factors including proportion of income spent-level, consumer academic-level, demand-types, demand time, possibility of postponing demand-level, price-level, demand-level, and awareness of participation benefits-level on price elasticity of electricity demand for Iran power system. To achieve this, a nonlinear-empirical model based on response surface methodology is proposed. Thereafter, these factors were prioritized based on their effect on price elasticity. Analysis results reveal that proportion of income spent-level has the most significant effect on the price elasticity of electricity demand while consumer academic-level has the least effect. These results could be applied by policy makers as a tool in making decisions on how to set the price of electricity.

Keywords

Statistical analysis Strategic planning Price elasticity of demand Response surface methodology Empirical model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely would like to express their appreciation to the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) for supporting this work through FRGS Grant (Vote No: 4F911) and Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) for providing funds to carry out the research reported in this paper.

References

  1. Al-Sahlawi, M. A. (1989). The demand for natural gas: a survey of price and income elasticities. The Energy Journal, 77–90.Google Scholar
  2. Arisoy, I., & Ozturk, I. (2014). Estimating industrial and residential electricity demand in Turkey: a time varying parameter approach. Energy, 66, 959–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assadian, M, Shirdar, M. R., Idris, M. H., Izman, S., Almasi, D., Taheri, M. M., et al. (2015). Optimisation of electrophoretic deposition parameters in coating of metallic substrate by hydroxyapatite using response surface methodology, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  4. Brons, M., Nijkamp, P., Pels, E., & Rietveld, P. (2008). A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand. A SUR approach. Energy Economics, 30, 2105–2122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carliner, G. (1973). Income elasticity of housing demand. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 528–532.Google Scholar
  6. Dergiades, T., & Tsoulfidis, L. (2008). Estimating residential demand for electricity in the United States, 1965–2006. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2722–2730.Google Scholar
  7. Dornbusch, R. (1987). Open economy macroeconomics: new directions, ed: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.Google Scholar
  8. Espey, M. (1998). Gasoline demand revisited: an international meta-analysis of elasticities. Energy Economics, 20, 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan, S., & Hyndman, R. J. (2011). The price elasticity of electricity demand in South Australia. Energy Policy, 39, 3709–3719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foley, A., Gallachóir, B. Ó., Hur, J., Baldick, R., & McKeogh, E. (2010). A strategic review of electricity systems models. Energy, 35, 4522–4530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gyamfi, S., Krumdieck, S., & Urmee, T. (2013). Residential peak electricity demand response—highlights of some behavioural issues. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Havranek, T., & Kokes, O. (2015). Income elasticity of gasoline demand: a meta-analysis. Energy Economics, 47, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Havranek, T., Irsova, Z., & Janda, K. (2012). Demand for gasoline is more price-inelastic than commonly thought. Energy Economics, 34, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Havranek, T., Horvath, R., Irsova, Z., & Rusnak, M. (2015). Cross-country heterogeneity in intertemporal substitution. Journal of International Economics, 96, 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He, Y., Yang, L., He, H., Luo, T., & Wang, Y. (2011). Electricity demand price elasticity in China based on computable general equilibrium model analysis. Energy, 36, 1115–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hernandez, J. A., & Koch, C. (2015). An assessment of energy consumption and price responsiveness: evidence from Dominican Republic. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 1, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jamil, F., & Ahmad, E. (2011). Income and price elasticities of electricity demand: aggregate and sector-wise analyses. Energy Policy, 39, 5519–5527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirschen, D and Strbac, G. (2005). Basic concepts from Economics, Fundamentals of Power System Economics, pp. 11–47.Google Scholar
  19. Kiss, J. T., & Kocsis, I. (2014). Price and income elasticity of electricity consumption in Hungary. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 13, 2809–2815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristianto Nugroho, Y. (2013). Developing price and production postponement strategies of substitutable product. Journal of Modelling in Management, 8, 190–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, L., & Li, M. (2014). Evaluation of energy production companies efficiency based on the combination of principal component analysis (PCA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 13, 1147–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lijesen, M. G. (2007). The real-time price elasticity of electricity. Energy Economics, 29, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Malik, Z., & Rashid, K. (2000). Comparison of optimization by response surface methodology with neurofuzzy methods. Magnetics IEEE Transactions on, 36, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maqbool S, M. Babar, and E. A. Al-Ammar, Effects of demand elasticity and price variation on load profile, in Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Middle East (ISGT Middle East), 2011 I.E. PES Conference on, 2011, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  25. McFadden D, C. Puig, and D. Kirschner, Determinants of the long-run demand for electricity, in Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, 1977, pp. 109–19.Google Scholar
  26. Nojavan, S., Qesmati, H., Zare, K., & Seyyedi, H. (2014). Large consumer electricity acquisition considering time-of-use rates demand response programs. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39, 8913–8923.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Noordin, M. Y., Venkatesh, V. C., Sharif, S., Elting, S., & Abdullah, A. (2004). Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 145, 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paul A. C, E. C. Myers, and K. L. Palmer, A partial adjustment model of US electricity demand by region, season, and sector, 2009.Google Scholar
  29. Pielow A, R. Sioshansi, M. C. Roberts, Modeling short-run electricity demand with long-term growth rates and consumer price elasticity in commercial and industrial sectors Energy, 46, pp. 533–540, 2012.Google Scholar
  30. Shirdar, M. R., Golshan, A., Izman, S., & Ghodsiyeh, D. (2014). The application of surface response methodology to the pretreatment of WC substrates prior to diamond coating. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 23, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shirdar, M. R, Taheri, M. M., Moradifard, H., Keyvanfar, A., Shafaghat, A., Shokuhfar, T., et al. (2016). Hydroxyapatite-Titania nanotube composite as a coating layer on Co-Cr-based implants: mechanical and electrochemical optimization, Ceramics International.Google Scholar
  32. Silk, J. I., & Joutz, F. L. (1997). Short and long-run elasticities in US residential electricity demand: a co-integration approach. Energy Economics, 19, 493–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smolny, W. (1998). Monopolistic price setting and supply rigidities in a disequilibrium framework. Economic Theory, 11, 157–169.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Thimmapuram, P. R., & Kim, J. (2013). Consumers’ price elasticity of demand modeling with economic effects on electricity markets using an agent-based model. Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on, 4, 390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. U. EIA, Annual energy outlook 2013, US Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, 2013Google Scholar
  36. Wang, K., Ouyang, Z., Krishnan, R., Shu, L., & He, L. (2015). A game theory-based energy management system using price elasticity for smart grids. Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on, 11, 1607–1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang, X.-P. (2010). Restructured electric power systems: analysis of electricity markets with equilibrium models vol. 71: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdullah Asuhaimi Bin Mohd Zin
    • 1
  • Mehdi Moradi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)Johor BahruMalaysia

Personalised recommendations