Energy Efficiency

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 893–925 | Cite as

A system dynamics approach to analyse the impact of energy efficiency policy on ESCO ventures in European Union countries: a case study of Portugal

  • Carlos Capelo
  • João Ferreira Dias
  • Renato Pereira
Original Article
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

The development of a competitive and sustainable market for energy performance contracting (EPC) projects supplied by energy service companies (ESCO) may contribute to realising the existent potential of energy savings. Nevertheless, in different countries, like Portugal, this market is still immature and remains far below its promised potential. Different from the existent research that assumes factors operate independently and focusses on how to remove barriers to the adoption of EPC, this study provides insights into how delayed impacts from interdependent policies affect the business processes of an energy service business venture. To understand the relationships beneath the dynamics of those small and developing ESCO markets in the European Union (EU), a system dynamics model of an ESCO venture was developed. The model simulation provides a powerful tool to improve understanding and accelerate learning of the policies that critically impact venture performance. The base case simulation shows an unattractive market value added (MVA) and a high probability of a firm’s failure. The demand simulation is quite sensitive to the word-of-mouth (WOM) parameter, and simultaneous initiatives to positively intensify it with incentive public policies such as low interest rate and demonstration projects significantly increased the MVA, reduced the probability of the firm’s failure, and consequently increased the widespread adoption of EPC.

Keywords

Energy service company (ESCO) Energy efficiency Energy policy Business simulation System dynamics 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Backlund, S., & Eidenskog, M. (2013). Energy service collaborations—it is a question of trust. Energy Efficiency, 6(3), 511–521.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-012-9189-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlas, Y. (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 12, 183–210.Google Scholar
  3. Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 13, 215–227.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertoldi, P., & Boza-Kissb, B. (2017). Analysis of barriers and drivers for the development of the ESCO markets in Europe. Energy Policy, 107, 345–355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, B., & Vine, E. (2006). Energy service companies in European countries: current status and a strategy to foster their development. Energy Policy, 34(14), 1818–1832.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertoldi, P., Boza-Kiss, B., Panevm, S., & Labanca, N. (2014). ESCO Market Report 2013 - EUR 26691 EN. Brussels: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy.Google Scholar
  7. Blumberga, A., Blumberga, D., Bazbauers, G., Zogla, G., & Laicane, I. (2014). Sustainable development modelling for the energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 134–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, M. A. (2001). Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies. Energy Policy, 29(14), 1197–1207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00067-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng, Y. Y., Blok, K., & van der Leun, K. (2012). Transition to a fully sustainable global energy system. Energy Strategy Review, 1(2), 109–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2012.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng, Q., Zhang, L., Cui, Q., & Jiang, X. (2014). A simulation-based decision model for designing contract period in building energy performance contracting. Building and Environment, 71, 71–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deng, Q., Jiang, X., Zhang, L., & Cui, Q. (2015). Making optimal investment decisions for energy service companies under uncertainty: a case study. Energy, 88, 234–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dreessen, T. (2003). Advantages and disadvantages of the two dominant world ESCO models: shared savings and guaranteed savings. In P. Bertoldi (Ed.), Proceedings of the first pan European Conference on energy service companies, Milan.Google Scholar
  13. Dyner, I., Larsen, E., & Franco, C. J. (2009). Games for electricity traders: understanding risk in a deregulated industry. Energy Policy, 37(2), 465–471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fang, W. S., Miller, S. M., & Yeh, C. C. (2012). The effect of ESCOs on energy use. Energy Policy, 51, 558–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ford, A. (2008). Simulation scenarios for rapid reduction in carbon dioxide emissions in the western electricity system. Energy Policy, 36(1), 443–455.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldman, C., Hopper, N., & Osborn, J. (2005). Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data. Energy Policy, 33(3), 387–405.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hannon, M. J., Foxon, T. J., & Gale, W. F. (2013). The co-evolutionary relationship between energy service companies and the UK energy system: implications for a low-carbon transition. Energy Policy, 61, 1031–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansen, S.J. (2011). ESCOs around the world. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment 30 (3), 9–15.Google Scholar
  19. Heiskanen, E., Lovio, R., & Jalas, M. (2011). Path creation for sustainable consumption: promoting alternative heating systems in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(16), 1892–1900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kindström, D., Ottosson, M., & Thollander, P. (2017). Driving forces for and barriers to providing energy services—a study of local and regional energy companies in Sweden. Energy Efficiency, 10(1), 21–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9437-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kostka, G., & Shin, K. (2013). Energy conservation through energy service companies: empirical analysis from China. Energy Policy, 52, 748–759.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Limaye, D. R., & Limaye, E. S. (2011). Scaling up energy efficiency: the case for a super ESCO. Energy Efficiency, 4(2), 133–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-011-9119-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marino, A., Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S. (2010). Energy service companies market in Europe - status report 2010. Institute for energy, joint research centre, European commission, JRC 59863, EUR 24516 EN, Luxembourg, p. 1–90.Google Scholar
  24. Marino, A., Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., & Boza-Kiss, B. (2011). A snapshot of the European energy service market in 2010 and policy recommendations to foster a further market development. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6190–6198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller, D., Sterman, J. (2007). New venture commercialization of clean energy technologies. Proceedings of the 25th International System Dynamics Conference, Boston.Google Scholar
  26. Mills, E., Kromer, S., Weiss, G., & Mathew, P. A. (2006). From volatility to value: analyzing and managing financial and performance risk in energy savings projects. Energy Policy, 34(2), 188–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morecroft, J. (2015). Strategic modelling and business dynamics: a feedback systems approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119176831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Okay, N., & Akman, U. (2010). Analysis of ESCO activities using country indicators. Renewable Sustainable Energy Review, 14(9), 2760–2771.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Painuly, J. P., Park, H., Lee, M. K., & Noh, J. (2003). Promoting energy efficiency financing and ESCOs in developing countries: mechanisms and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(6), 659–665.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00111-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Patari, S., & Sinkkonen, K. (2014). Energy service companies and energy performance contracting: is there a need to renew the business model? Insights from a Delphi study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 264–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patari, S., Annala, S., Jantunen, A., Viljainen, S., & Sinkkonen, A. (2016). Enabling and hindering factors of diffusion of energy service companies in Finland—results of a Delphi study. Energy Efficiency, 9(6), 1447–1460.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9433-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roshchanka, V., & Evans, M. (2016). Scaling up the energy service company business: market status and company feedback in the Russian Federation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3905–3914.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sardinou, E. (2008). Barriers to industrial energy efficiency investments in Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(13), 1416–1423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soroye, K., & Nilsson, L. (2010). Building a business to close the efficiency gap: the Swedish ESCO experience. Energy Efficiency, 3(3), 237–256.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-009-9069-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steinberger, J., Niel, J., & Bourg, D. (2009). Profiting from negawatts: reducing absolute consumption and emissions through a performance-based energy economy. Energy Policy, 37(1), 361–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: system thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, R.P., Govindarajalu, C., Levin, J., Meyer, A.S., Ward, W.A. (2008). Financing energy efficiency: lessons from Brazil, China, India, and beyond. Energy sector management assistance program (ESMAP). Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6349. Accessed 16 May 2017.
  38. Thollander, P., & Ottosson, M. (2008). An energy efficient Swedish pulp and paper industry - exploring barriers to and driving forces for cost-effective energy efficiency investments. Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 21–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.011
  39. Thumann, A., & Woodroof, E. (2009). Energy project financing: resources and strategies for success. Lilburn: The Fairmont Press.Google Scholar
  40. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Thollander, P., & Backlund, S. (2013). Barriers to industrial energy efficiency in foundries: a European comparison. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40(21), 161–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vine, E. (2005). An international survey of the energy service company (ESCO) industry. Energy Policy, 33(5), 691–704.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warren, K. (2008). Strategic management dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  43. Worrell, E., Bernstein, L., Roy, J., Price, L., & Harnisch, J. (2009). Industrial energy efficiency and climate change mitigation. Energy Efficiency, 2(2), 109–123.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9032-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Young, S., O’Byrne, S. (2000). EVA and value-based management: a practical guide to implementation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Capelo
    • 1
  • João Ferreira Dias
    • 2
  • Renato Pereira
    • 3
  1. 1.Universidade EuropeiaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.LisbonPortugal
  3. 3.OBSERVARE/UALLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations