Abstract
Employing the edge-ray principle, the anidolic system (AS) has been proven as a promising daylighting solution for various climates. However, studies on the thermal performance of an AS are still rare. Because of the dominant contribution of the space-cooling load to building energy consumption at the operational stage in hot climates, knowledge of the impact of AS application on the space-cooling load is important. This study assessed the energy-saving potential of AS in the tropics by measuring the daylight level and distribution, as well as the solar heat gain, based on Radiance and EnergyPlus simulations using weather files of two locations in the tropics—Yogyakarta and Singapore. Monitoring data of a full-scale, unoccupied test building was acquired to validate the Radiance simulations and EnergyPlus models. A comparison between the energy-saving potential for lighting and cooling of AS and conventional aperture models showed that the application of AS in the tropics benefits the daylighting performance (DF ≥ 3% and horizontal distribution 51–70%), but still produces higher solar heat gains (44–437% higher than those of clerestory only). Narrow anidolic collectors with medium angular spread (45°–52°) and maximum clerestory height equipped with internal shelves can be applied to produce lower solar heat gain or indoor air temperature (2%) with sufficient daylight levels (≥ 2%) and an increased in horizontal illuminance distribution (> 57%).
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AS:
-
anidolic system
- Awin :
-
window area
- CL:
-
clerestory
- Cx_Ay_wz:
-
y-m-wide, z-degree-angular spread anidolic collector installed on a x-m-height clerestory
- DF:
-
daylight factor
- dT:
-
temperature difference
- ECHTC:
-
external convective heat transfer coefficient
- eAd:
-
Adaptive Algorithm for external convective heat transfer coefficient
- eDO:
-
DOE-2 for external convective heat transfer coefficient
- eTA:
-
TARP for external convective heat transfer coefficient
- eMo:
-
MoWiTT for external convective heat transfer coefficient
- E i :
-
indoor illuminance
- E o :
-
outdoor illuminance
- ε room :
-
indoor surface emissivity
- ε win :
-
interior window surface emissivity
- F win-room :
-
view factor from the window to the other surfaces of the room
- HS:
-
horizontal shading
- ICHTC:
-
internal convective heat transfer coefficient
- iA:
-
Adaptive Algorithm for internal convective heat transfer coefficient
- iT:
-
TARP for internal convective heat transfer coefficient
- IS WS:
-
intermediate sky with the sun
- QIR :
-
net heat transfer from the window to the room surfaces
- T i :
-
indoor air temperature
- T o :
-
outdoor (ambient) air temperature
- WFR:
-
window to floor area ratio
- x_AS:
-
anidolic system installed on x-m-wide room
- x_Ay:
-
x-m-wide anidolic system installed on y-m-wide room
References
Aizlewood, M. E. (1993). Innovative daylighting systems: an experimental evaluation. Lighting Research and Technology, 25(4), 141–152.
Al-Obaidi, K. M., Ismail, M., & Abdul Rahman, A. M. (2014). A study of the impacts of environmental loads that penetrate a passive skylight roofing system in Malaysian buildings. Frontiers Architectural Research, 3, 178–191.
ASHRAE. (2013). ASHRAE Handbook: Fundamental. Atlanta: ASHRAE.
Binarti, F. (2009). Energy-Efficient Window for Classroom in Warm Tropical Area. 11th International IBPSA Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, July 27–30, 2009, pp.1655–1662.
Binarti, F., & Dewi, S. (2016). The effectiveness of light shelf in tropical urban context. Environmental and Climate Technologies December, 18, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2016-0012.
Binarti, F., & Satwiko, P. (2015). Long-term monitoring and simulations of the daylighting and thermal performance of an anidolic daylighting system on a tropical urban house. Energy Procedia, 78, 1787–1792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.307.
Binarti, F., & Satwiko, P. (2016). An east-facing anidolic daylighting system on a tropical urban house. Indoor and Built Environment, 25(4), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X15574787.
Chirarattananon, S., & Chaiwiwatworakul, P. (2007). Distribution of sky luminance and radiance of North Bangkok under standard distributions. Renewable Energy, 26, 1328–1345.
Crawley, D.B., Lawrie, L.K., Winkelmann, F.C., Buhl, W.F., Pedersen, C.O., Strand, R.K., Liesen, R.J., Fisher, D.E., Witte, M.J., Henninger, R.H., Glazer, J., & Shirey, D. (2013). EnergyPlus v.8.1. Atlanta, Georgia.
Ellis, P. G. (2003). Development and validation of the unvented Trombe Wall model in EnergyPlus. USA: Master Thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Erell, E., Kaftan, E., & Garb, Y. (2014). Daylighting for Visual Comfort and Energy Conservation in Offices in Sunny Regions. Proc. of 30th International PLEA Conference - Sustainable Habitat for Developing Societies, Ahmedabad, India, 16–18 December 2014.
Goia, F. (2016). Search for the optimal window-to-wall ratio in office buildings in different European climates and the implication on total energy saving potential. Applied Energy, 132, 467–492.
Hachem, C., Athienitis, A., & Fazio, P. (2011). Parametric investigation form effects on solar potential of housing units. Solar Energy, 85, 1864–1877.
Huang, Y., Niu, J.-L., & Chung, T.-M. (2014). Comprehensive analysis on thermal and daylighting performance of glazing and shading designs on office building envelope in cooling-dominant climates. Applied Energy, 134, 215–228.
Kleindienst, S.A. (2006). Improving the daylighting conditions of existing buildings: the benefits and limitations of integrating anidolic daylighting systems using the American classroom as a model. Master thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2006.
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). (2009). Reference Guide for Green Building Design and Construction, for the Design, Construction and Major Renovations of Commercial and Institutional Building Including Core and Shell K-12 School Projects, ed.www.usgbc.org. Accessed 6 November 2010.
Linhart, F., Wittkopf, S. K., & Scartezzini, J.-L. (2010). Performance of anidolic daylighting systems in tropical climates, parametric studies for identification of main influencing factors. Solar Energy, 84, 1085–1094.
Loutsenhiser, P. G., Manz, H., Felsmann, C., Strachan, P. A., Frank, T., & Maxwell, G. M. (2007). Empirical validation of models to compute solar irradiance on inclined surfaces for building energy simulation. Solar Energy, 81, 254–267.
Loutsenhiser, P. G., Manz, H., Carl, S., Simmler, H., & Maxwell, G. M. (2008). Empirical validations of solar gain models for a glazing unit with exterior and interior blind assemblies. Energy and Buildings, 40, 330–340.
Marsch, A.(2005). Ecotect Software v.5.5. Square One, Cardiff.
McNeil, A. & Lee, E. (2012). A validation of the Radiance three phase simulation method for modeling annual daylight performance of optically complex fenestration systems. Building Performance Simulation 1–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2012.671852.
Michael, A., & Heracleous, C. (2016). Assessment of natural lighting performance and visual comfort of educational architecture in southern Europe: the case of typical educational school premises in Cyprus. Energy and Buildings, 140, 443–457.
Michael, A., Gregoriou, S., & Kalogirou, S. A. (2017). Environmental assessment of an integrated adaptive system for the improvement of indoor visual comfort of existing buildings. Renewable Energy, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.079.
Mirsadeghi, M., Costola, D., Blocken, B., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2013). Review of external convective heat transfer coefficient models in building energy simulation programs: implementation and uncertainty. Applied Thermal Engineering, 56(1–2), 134–151.
Praditwattanakit, R., Chaiwiwatworakul, P., & Chirarattananon, S. (2013). Anidolic concentrator to enhance the daylight use in tropical buildings. In: International Conference on Alternative Energy in Developing Countries and Emerging Economies. Bangkok, Thailand, 30–31 May 2013, ftp://202.28.64.61/04.April2013/Dowload/print/ 139_Rut%20Praditwattanakit.docx. Accessed 7 August 2014.
Prasetyo, S. S., & Kusumarini, Y. (2016). Studi Efisiensi dan Konservasi Energi pada Interior Gedung P Universitas Kristen Petra. Jurnal INTRA, 4(1), 36–45.
Pritchard, D.C. (ed). (1986). Interior lighting design, 6th ed., London: The Lighting Industry Federation Ltd. And The Electricity Council.
Rahim, R. & Mulyadi, R. (2004). Preliminary study of horizontal illuminance in Indonesia. In: 5th SENVAR, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia, 10–12 December 2004, pp.1–10.
Reinhart, C. F., & Andersen, M. (2006). Development and validation of a radiance model for a translucent panel. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 890–904.
Roshan, M., Kandar, M. Z. B., Nikpur, M., Mohammadi, M. P., & Ghasemi, M. (2013). Investigating the performance of anidolic daylighting system with respect to building orientation in tropical area. IRACST-ESTIJ, 3, 74–79.
Scartezzini, J.-L., & Courret, G. (2002). Anidolic daylighting systems. Solar Energy, 73, 123–135.
Singh, R., Lazarus, I. J., & Kishore, V. V. N. (2015). Effect of internal woven roller shade and glazing on the energy and daylighting performances of an office building in the cold climate of Shillong. Applied Energy, 159, 317–333.
Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI). (2011). SNI-6390: Konservasi energi sistem tata udara bangunan gedung. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Sunaga, N., Soebarto, V., Hyde, R., Ribeiro, M. A. Junghans, L., Binarti, F., & Calderaro, V. (2008). Chapter 9: design, elements, and strategies. In R. Hyde (Ed.), Bioclimatic housing: innovative designs for warm climates. London: Earthscan.
Tindale, A. & Potter, S. (2014). DesignBuilder v.4.0. Gloucestershire.
University of Illinois and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. (2015). EnergyPlus Documentation: Engineering Reference.
Ward, G. (2002). Desktop radiance software. California: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Wittkopf, S. K. (2006). Daylight performance of anidolic ceiling under different sky conditions. Solar Energy, 81, 151–161.
Wittkopf, S. K., Grobe, L. O., Compagnon, R., Kampf, J., Linhart, F., & Scartezzini, J.-L. (2010). Ray tracing study for non-imaging daylight collectors. Solar Energy, 84, 986–996.
Zhu, D., Hong, T., Yan, D., & Wang, C. (2012). Comparison of building energy modeling programs: building loads. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) – 6034E. LA.
Acknowledgements
Authors gratefully acknowledge the Directorate of Higher Education Republic Indonesia, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education in the scheme of Hibah Bersaing (the second year) under the contract number 005/HB-LIT/III/2015 (Government to University) for supporting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Binarti, F., Satwiko, P. Assessing the energy saving potential of anidolic system in the tropics. Energy Efficiency 11, 955–974 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9603-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9603-7