Spatial and temporal analysis of energy use data in Los Angeles public schools
- 176 Downloads
School buildings are significant energy consumers. They are important targets for energy efficiency improvements, which can reduce energy spending and meet energy policy goals for state and federal governments. In the US, few studies have quantified electricity and natural gas consumption patterns in schools. Such information vitally supports energy planning and benchmarking. We present an analysis of high-detail electricity and natural gas consumption for schools in Los Angeles County over an extended period of time. Using a robust database of monthly account-level consumption, we examine electricity and natural gas consumption trends for hundreds of schools in relation to key structural and categorical characteristics, including size, geography, and school type. Results show that school energy use varies greatly across socio-demographic, structural, and climate factors. Correlations between electricity and natural gas consumption are time dependent and seasonally distinct. The analysis provides a useful case study with benchmarks for US public schools and demonstrates challenges with devising large-scale studies of school energy use. We conclude with a discussion of policy implications.
KeywordsElectricity Natural gas Institutional buildings Elementary Secondary California
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- ACEEE. (2014). Best practices for working with utilities to improve access to energy use data. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
- Brown, R. (2012). Modeled vs. actual energy savings for energy upgrade California home retrofits. BKi.Google Scholar
- California Energy Commission (2017). Proposition 39 K-12 Program and Energy Conservation Assistance Act 2015-2016 Progress Report.Google Scholar
- CCC (2016). California Community Colleges Proposition 39 implementation guidelines. California: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office.Google Scholar
- CEC. (2016). Proposition 39 K-12 Program: California Clean Energy Jobs Act - 2016. Energy Expenditure Plan Handbook. Sacramento: California Energy Commission.Google Scholar
- CPUC (2014). Decision adopting rules to provide access to energy usage and usage-related data while protecting privacy of personal data.Google Scholar
- CPUC (2016). California energy efficiency statistics portal (Beta). http://eestats.cpuc.ca.gov. Accessed 16 May 2016.
- Demanuele, C., Tweddell, T., & Davies, M. (2010). Bridging the gap between predicted and actual energy performance in schools. Abu Dhabi: UAE.Google Scholar
- EIA. (2012). Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Energy Information Administration.Google Scholar
- Katafygiotou, M. C., & Serghides, D. K. (2014). Analysis of structural elements and energy consumption of school building stock in Cyprus: energy simulations and upgrade scenarios of a typical school. Energy and Buildings, 72, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kolter, J. Z., & Johnson, M. J. (2011). REDD: A public data set for energy disaggregation research. Proceedings of the SustKDD workshop on Data Mining Applications in Sustainability.Google Scholar
- LA County Office of the Assessor (2008). Los Angeles County Property Assessment Database. Los Angeles County: LA County Office of the Assessor.Google Scholar
- LA Times (2015). Mapping L.A. Project.Google Scholar
- LACDPW (2012). Los Angeles County Cities shape files.Google Scholar
- LARIAC (2012). Countywide Buildings Outlines shapfile.Google Scholar
- Menezes, A. C., Cripps, A., Bouchlaghem, D., & Buswell, R. (2012). Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap. Applied Energy, 97, 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pincetl, S. (2015). LA Energy Atlas Development Team. LA Energy Atlas. California Center for Sustainable Communities. UCLA. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
- Pincetl, S., Graham, R., Murphy, S., & Sivaraman, D. (2015). Analysis of high-resolution utility data for understanding energy use in urban systems: the case of Los Angeles, California: electricity use in Los Angeles. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12299.
- Plympton, P., Conway, S., & Epstein, K. (2000). Daylighting in schools: improving student performance and health at a price schools can afford. Golden: National Renewable Energy The Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Santamouris, M., Mihalakakou, G., Patargias, P., Gaitani, N., Sfakianaki, K., Papaglastra, M., et al. (2007). Using intelligent clustering techniques to classify the energy performance of school buildings. Energy and Buildings, 39, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.04.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharp, T. (1998). Benchmarking energy use in schools. Proceedings of the ACEEE 1998 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings 3.Google Scholar
- Widén, J., Lundh, M., Vassileva, I., Dahlquist, E., Ellegård, K., & Wäckelgård, E. (2009). Constructing load profiles for household electricity and hot water from time-use data—modelling approach and validation. Energy and Buildings, 41, 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.02.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar