Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Demographic determinants of Canada’s households’ adoption of energy efficiency measures: observations from the Households and Environment Survey, 2013

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In addition to a growing and aging population, Canada has experienced large shifts in its residential sector. There are more households, homes are larger with less people in them, and there are more appliances per household, all of which contribute to increased energy consumption. The present work explores the demographic determinants of residential energy efficiency adoption using the 2013 Households and Environment Survey. With binary logistic regressions, we predicted the odds of households adopting three energy-efficient actions: energy-saving lights, programmable thermostats, and changes to a dwelling following an energy audit. Although it was found that Canadian households are participating in energy efficiency, not all groups are participating equally. Similar to previous research, seniors appear to be more inclined to adopt less challenging measures such as energy-saving lights, as opposed to more intensive dwelling upgrades. Additionally, levels of education and income were positively related to the adoption of energy efficiency measures. However, the results showed household income to be less of a contributing factor for decisions regarding dwelling changes compared to the financial incentives offered via government grants. The results suggest a need to increase energy efficiency education and to continue offering financial incentives as the country increases its residential energy efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2011). Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: the role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecology Review, 18(1), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2014). Measures of fit for logistic regression. In SAS Global Forum, Washington, DC.

  • Ameli, N., & Brandt, N. (2015). Determinants of households’ investment in energy efficiency and renewables: evidence from the OECD survey on household environmental behaviour and attitudes. Environmental Research Letters, 10(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benders, R. M. J., Kok, R., Moll, H. C., Wiersma, G., & Noorman, K. J. (2006). New approaches for household energy conservation—in search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. Energy Policy, 2006(34), 3612–3622.

  • Berry, L., & Brown, M. (1988). Participation of the elderly in residential conservation programmes. Energy Policy, 16(2), 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L., & Schweitzer, M. (1991). Residential conservation programmes for the elderly. Marketing techniques and organizational structures. Energy Policy, 19(6), 596–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesiot, W., & Noorman, K. J. (1999). Energy requirements of household consumption: a case study of the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 28(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00113-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, R. (2015). Canada dims the light on the incandescent light bulb. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/canada-dims-the-light-on-the-incandescent-light-bulb/article22739434/

  • Brounen, D., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2013). Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households. Energy Economics, 38, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., Gorgolewski, M., & Goodwill, A. (2015). Using physical, behavioral, and demographic variables to explain suite-level energy use in multiresidential buildings. Building and Environment, 89, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. A., & Rollinson, P. A. (1985). Residential energy consumption in low-income and elderly households: how nondiscretionar is it? Energy Systems and Policy, 9(3), 271–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • CMHC. (2008). Impacts of the aging of the Canadian population on housing and communities. Research Highlight, Socio-Economic Series. Retrieved from www.cmhc.ca.

  • CMHC. (2012). Housing for older Canadians: the definitive guide to the over-55 market: Planning the Project, 1.

  • Fawcett, T. (2014). Exploring the time dimension of low carbon retrofit: owner-occupied housing. Building Research & Information, 42(4), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.804769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Hobman, E. V. (2015). The socio-demographic and psychological predictors of residential energy consumption: a comprehensive review. Energies, 8(1), 573–609. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8010573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. (1981). An analysis of energy consumption patterns by stage of family life cycle. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(May), 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamtessa, S. F. (2013). An explanation of residential energy-efficiency retrofit behavior in Canada. Energy and Buildings, 57, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2008). The short list: the most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Environment, 50, 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(3), 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, K., Harding, M., & Rapson, D. (2012). Split incentives in residential energy consumption. The Energy Journal, 33(2), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, A. L., & Theis, T. L. (2014). Residential energy-efficient lighting adoption survey. Energy Efficiency, 7, 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-013-9226-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoicka, C. E., Parker, P., & Andrey, J. (2014). Residential energy efficiency retrofits: how program design affects participation and outcomes. Energy Policy, 65, 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D., & Bunker, R. (2006). Planning, housing and energy use: a review, urban policy and research. Urban Policy and Research, 24, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, G. M., Hamilton, I., Chalabi, Z., Shipworth, D., & Oreszczyn, T. (2015). Explaining domestic energy consumption—the comparative contribution of building factors, socio-demographics, behaviours and attitudes. Applied Energy, 159, 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, M., & Dennis, M. (2006). Estimating home energy decision parameters for a hybrid energy—economy policy model. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 11(2), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macey, S. M. (1988). Eldery consumption and the elderly. The Canadian Geographer, 2(2), 167–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra, K., & Gustavsson, L. (2008). An adopter-centric approach to analyze the diffusion patterns of innovative residential heating systems in Sweden. Energy Policy, 36(2), 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maller, C. J., & Horne, R. E. (2011). Living lightly: how does climate change feature in residential home improvements and what are the implications for policy? Urban Policy and Research, 29(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. Gabriola Island: New society publishers.

  • Michelsen, C. C., & Madlener, R. (2012). Homeowners’ preferences for adopting innovative residential heating systems: a discrete choice analysis for Germany. Energy Economics, 34(5), 1271–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, B. F., & Schleich, J. (2010). Why don’t households see the light? Explaining the diffusion of compact fluorescent lamps. Resource and Energy Economics, 32(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, B., Schleich, J., & Volume, E. P. (2012). Residential energy-efficient technology adoption, energy conservation, knowledge, and attitudes: an analysis of European countries. Energy Policy, 49, 616–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, G., Gustavsson, L., & Mahapatra, K. (2010). Factors influencing energy efficiency investments in existing Swedish residential buildings. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2956–2963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Canada. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/funding/efficiency/4947

  • Natural Resources Canada. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/corporate/statistics/neud/dpa/data_e/glossary_e.cfm#p

  • Natural Resources Canada. (2016). Energy efficiency trends in Canada 1990 to 2013.

  • Pan, Y., & Jackson, R. T. (2008). Ethnic difference in the relationship between acute inflammation and serum ferritin in US adult males. Epidemiology and Infection, 136, 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peffer, T., Pritoni, M., Meier, A., Aragon, C., & Perry, D. (2011). How people use thermostats in homes: a review. Building and Environment, 46(12), 2529–2541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: a conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00154-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Reid, L., Sutton, P., & Hunter, C. (2010). Theorizing the meso level: the household as a crucible of pro-environmental behaviour. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. R. B., Mcdougall, G. H. G., & Claxton, J. D. (1981). Complexities of household energy consumption and conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, P. A. (2001). Statistical methods for geography. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabia, J. J. (2008). There’s no place like home. A hazard model analysis of aging in place among older homeowners in the PSID. Research on Aging, 30(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027507307919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santin, O. G. (2011). Behavioural patterns and user profiles related to energy consumption for heating. Energy and Buildings, 43(10), 2662–2672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardianou, E., & Genoudi, P. (2013). Which factors affect the willingness of consumers to adopt renewable energies? Renewable Energy, 57, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (1998). Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings. Energy Policy, 26(15), 1105–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2011) Census of population and statistics Canada catalogue no. 98-313-XCB http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/famil55a-eng.htm. Accessed 23 Oct 2017.

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., & Gardner, G. T. (1981). Psychological research and energy policy. American Psychologist, 36(4), 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, B., & Berry, L. (1986). Determinants of participation in home energy audit/loan programs: discrete choice model results. Energy, 11(8), 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toronto Hydro. (n.d.). Retrived from http://www.torontohydro.com/sites/electricsystem/electricityconservation/residentialconservation/Pages/HomeLighting.aspx

  • US Department of Enrgy. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://energy.gov/energysaver/thermostats

  • Verhage, B. J. (1980). Stimulating energy conservation: applying the business heritage of marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 14(4), 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warriner, G. K. (1981). Electricity consumption by the elderly: policy implications. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 258–264.

  • Wilson, C., Crane, L., & Chryssochoidis, G. (2015). Why do homeowners renovate energy efficiently? Contrasting perspectives and implications for policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 7, 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. Although the research and analysis are based on data from Statistics Canada, the opinions expressed do not represent the views of Statistics Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Interdisciplinary Studies, Royal Roads University, 2005 Sooke Rd, Victoria, BC, V9B 5Y2, Canada

    Runa Das

  2. Department of Architectural Science, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada

    Russell Richman

  3. School of Environment, Enterprise and Development, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada

    Craig Brown

Authors
  1. Runa Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Russell Richman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Craig Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Runa Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, R., Richman, R. & Brown, C. Demographic determinants of Canada’s households’ adoption of energy efficiency measures: observations from the Households and Environment Survey, 2013. Energy Efficiency 11, 465–482 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9578-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9578-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation