Advertisement

Energy Efficiency

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 1143–1153 | Cite as

The persistent effectiveness of online feedback and controls for sustainability in the workplace

  • Ray YunEmail author
  • Azizan Aziz
  • Bertrand Lasternas
  • Vivian Loftness
  • Peter Scupelli
  • Chenlu Zhang
Original Article

Abstract

Office workers tend to waste energy at work due to little motivation for saving energy. This study investigates the effectiveness of online feedback (e.g., self-monitoring, advice, comparison) and control strategies (e.g., online remote control, scheduled control) that can promote voluntary energy conservation in the workplace. Eighty office workers were divided into four groups, and feedback and control interventions were field-tested for 9 months. Baseline data was collected for 14 weeks; different interventions were given to the four groups for 13 weeks and then removed from the groups for 11 weeks. During and after the interventions occurred, the groups that had online controls achieved more energy savings than the groups that had no online controls. While there were no statistical energy savings with computer usage before and after the intervention, the monitor, light, and phone devices showed significant savings as a result. Surveys and interviews were also conducted after the experiment to learn the participants’ behavior and intentions. The findings discussed are based on their responses.

Keywords

Online feedback Online control Behavior change Energy dashboard Workplace 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Energy Efficient Buildings Hub Consortium (EEBHub.org, a US DOE Innovation Hub, Subtask 6.4) under the US Department of Energy Award Number EE0004261.

References

  1. 1E PC Energy Report. (2009). PC Energy Report 2009 United States, United Kingdom, Germany, online at https://www.1e.com/EnergyCampaign/downloads/PC_EnergyReport2009-UK.pdf
  2. Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1773–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2011). Context-aware recommender systems. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, & P. B. Kantor (Eds.), Recommender Systems Handbook (pp. 217–253). US: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bedwell, B., Leygue, C., Goulden, M., McAuley, D., Colley, J., Ferguson, E., Banks, N., & Spence, A. (2014). Apportioning energy consumption in the workplace: a review of issues in using metering data to motivate staff to save energy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(10), 1196–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bown, N. J., & Abrams, D. (2003). Despicability in the workplace: effects of behavioral deviance and unlikeability on the evaluation of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(11), 2413–2426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burger, J. M., Messian, N., Patel, S., del Prado, A., & Anderson, C. (2004). What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(1), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrico, A. R., & Riemer, M. (2011). Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: an evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DOE. (2010). 2010 Building Energy Data Book. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy online at http://buildingsdatabook.eere.energy.gov/.Google Scholar
  10. Ehrhardt-Martinez, K et al. J.A.S.: Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: a meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities. Washington, D.C. (2010)Google Scholar
  11. EIA,U. (2011). Annual energy review. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy: Washington, DC, online at www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer.
  12. Elgaaied, L. (2012). Exploring the role of anticipated guilt on pro-environmental behavior—a suggested typology of residents in France based on their recycling patterns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellway, B. P. (2013). Making it personal in a call centre: electronic peer surveillance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 28(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fogg, B. J. (2002). Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity, 2002(December). doi: 10.1145/763955.763957.
  16. Fogg, B. J. (2009, April). A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology (p. 40). ACM.Google Scholar
  17. Foster, D., Lawson, S., Wardman, J., Blythe, M., & Linehan, C. (2012). “Watts in it for me?”: design implications for implementing effective energy interventions in organisations. CHI ’12 (pp. 2357–2366). ACM.Google Scholar
  18. Ghatikar, G. (2014). Miscellaneous and electronic loads energy efficiency opportunities for commercial buildings: a collaborative study by the United States and India. Retrieved Mar 10, 2016 from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/80b1c401
  19. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granderson, J., Piette, M. A., & Ghatikar, G. (2011). Building energy information systems: user case studies. Energy Efficiency, 4(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrigan, M. (1994). Can we transform the market without transforming the customer? Home Energy, 11(1).Google Scholar
  22. Harrigan, M. S., & Gregory, J. M. (1994). Do savings from energy education persist?. Alliance to save energy.Google Scholar
  23. Jain, R. K., Taylor, J. E., & Culligan, P. J. (2013). Investigating the impact eco-feedback information representation has on building occupant energy consumption behavior and savings. Energy and Buildings, 64, 408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karjalainen, S. (2011). Consumer preferences for feedback on household electricity consumption. Energy and Buildings, 43(2), 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leygue, C., Ferguson, E., Skatova, A., & Spence, A. (2014). Energy sharing and energy feedback: affective and behavioral reactions to communal energy displays. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, I., Dey, A. K., & Forlizzi, J. (2011, September). Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (pp. 405–414). ACM.Google Scholar
  27. Lobato, C., Pless, S., Sheppy, M., & Torcellini, P. (2011, February). Reducing plug and process loads for a large scale, low energy office building: Nrel’s research support facility. In ASHRAE Winter Conference (Vol. 29, pp. 1–2).Google Scholar
  28. Lucid Design (2010a). Elon University strives to meet carbon commitment through behavior change. Retrieved Feb 14, 2016, from http://www.luciddesigngroup.com/download.php?id=20100701.
  29. Lucid Design (2010b). Elon University strives to meet carbon commitment through behavior change. Retrieved Apr 14, 2013, from http://www.luciddesigngroup.com/download.php?id=20100701.
  30. Mathes, E. W., & Kahn, A. (1975). Diffusion of responsibility and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 881–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mercier, C., & Moorefield, L. (2011). Commercial office plug load savings and assessment: final report. Produced by ECOVA and Supported Through the California Energy Commission’s Public Interest Energy Research Program.Google Scholar
  32. Metzger, I., Cutler, D., & Sheppy, M. (2012). Plug-load control and behavioral change research in GSA office buildings. San Francisco, CA: US General Services Administration.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mosler, H. J., & Gutscher, H. (2004). Promoting energy conserving behaviour by combining instructed self-diffusion with intervention instruments. Umweltpsychologie, 8(1), 50–65.Google Scholar
  34. Nilsson, A., Andersson, K., & Bergstad, C. J. (2015). Energy behaviors at the office: an intervention study on the use of equipment. Applied Energy, 146, 434–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. NREL (2013). Assessing and reducing plug and process loads in office buildings, Golden, CO, online at http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/54175.pdf
  36. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2), 230–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seligman, C., & Delay, J. M. (1977). Feedback as a means of decreasing residential energy consumption. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Siero, F. W., & Bakker, A. B. (1996). Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sustainability in the workplace report (2011) Retrieved Dec 12, 2014, from http://www.sustainabilityatwork.com.au/downloads/research-report.pdf
  40. Wilhite, H., & Ling, R. (1999). A. Hoivik and JG. Olsen (1999): Advances in the use of consumption feedback information in energy billing: the experiences of a Norwegian energy utility. In Proceedings, European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
  41. Winett, R. A., Neale, M. S., & Grier, H. C. (1979). Effects of self-monitoring and feedback on residential electricity consumption. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12(2), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood, G., & Newborough, M. (2007). Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes: enabling energy conservation with central and local displays. Energy and Buildings, 39(4), 495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yun, R., Scupelli, P., Aziz, A., Loftness, V. (2013a). Sustainability in the workplace: nine intervention techniques for behavior change. In Persuasive technology (pp. 253–265). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Yun, R., Lasternas, B., Aziz, A., Loftness, V., Scupelli, P., Rowe, A., Kothari, R., Marion, F., & Zhao J. (2013b). Toward the design of a dashboard to promote environmentally sustainable behavior among office workers. In Persuasive technology (pp. 246–252). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Yun, R., Aziz, A., Scupelli, P., Lasternas, B., Zhang, C., & Loftness, V. (2015a, April). Beyond eco-feedback: adding online manual and automated controls to promote workplace sustainability. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1989–1992). ACM.Google Scholar
  46. Yun, R. J., Aziz, A., & Lasternas, B. (2015b). Design implications for the presentation of eco-feedback data. Archives of Design Research, 28(4), 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray Yun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Azizan Aziz
    • 2
  • Bertrand Lasternas
    • 2
  • Vivian Loftness
    • 2
  • Peter Scupelli
    • 2
  • Chenlu Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.Hongik UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations