Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Energy assessment of the Portuguese meat industry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The meat product industries play a major role in many global economies. In several countries, it is the industry with a higher economic weight within the food industries. As refrigeration systems are indispensable within the production processes, it is important to improve the overall energy efficiency in order to reduce the electricity consumption in these industries. The electrical energy consumption of the Portuguese meat industries is evaluated in this paper. The field study shows that electrical energy accounts for 66.5 % of the overall energy consumption in slaughterhouses, 85 % in sausage houses and 92.5 % in ham industries. Relatively to the refrigeration systems of these industries, results show that the average compressor nominal power per unit of cold room volume is comprised between 0.072 and 0.043 kW/m3. The average value of the specific electrical energy consumption for the slaughterhouses was 149 kWh/tonHSCW, 660 kWh/tonRM for sausage houses and 1208 kWh/tonRM for ham production industries. Finally, a potential reduction of the electricity consumption based on simple energy efficiency measures was estimated in 24 % for the slaughterhouses, 13 % for the sausage houses and 8 % for the ham industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelaziz, E. A., Saidur, R., & Mekhilef, S. (2011). A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 150–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcázar-Ortega, M., Álvarez-Bel, C., Escrivá-Escrivá, G., & Domijan, A. (2012). Evaluation and assessment of demand response potential applied to the meat industry. Applied Energy, 92, 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., & Silva, P. D. (2011). Timing and future consequences of the peak of oil production. Futures, 43, 1044–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnau, J., Serra, X., Comaposada, J., Gou, P., & Garriga, M. (2007). Technologies to shorten the drying period of dry-cured meat products. Meat Science, 77, 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowater, F. J. (1997). Economies of meat chilling and freezing. In Proceeding of the Institute of Refrigeration, London (pp. 1–11).

  • Bowater, F. J. (2001). Rapid carcass chilling plants compared to conventional systems. Bristol: Cooling of Food, Meeting of IIR Commission C2.

    Google Scholar 

  • CL. (2003). Studio Ambientale di Comparto: i siti produttivi del Prosciutto di Parma, Comunne Langhirano (CL) Parma, Itália. http://www.comune.langhirano.pr.it/comune/page.asp?IDCategoria=287&IDSezione=8080&IDOggetto=7264&Tipo=GENERICO. Accessed 23 February 2015.

  • DGEG. (2011). Electricity consumption by activity sector. Directorate General for Energy and Geology. Lisbon, Portugal. http://www.dgeg.pt?cn=68917002707171207607AAAA. Accessed 11 July 2011.

  • EMAS. (2015). Certificate of environmental management system of company of fresh pork meat. Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS), Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/register/search/registration.do?registrationId=384521. Accessed 10 May 2015.

  • EREN. (2008). Energy assistance plan in the meat sector. Spain: Regional Energy Agency of Castilla and León (EREN). Agency of Castilla and León.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). Integrated pollution prevention and control. Draft reference document on best available technologies in the slaughterhouses and animal by-products industries. Brussels (EC): Final draft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2015). Europe in figures. Eurostat yearbook. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Europe_in_figures_-_Eurostat_yearbook. Accessed 05 September 2015.

  • FAO. (2009). The state of food and agriculture—livestock in the balance. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy, 2009. http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0680e/i0680e.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2011.

  • FoodDrinkEurope. (2014). Data & trends of the European food and drink industry 2013–2014. Brussels: FoodDrinkEurope.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzson, A., & Berntsson, T. (2006). Energy efficiency in the slaughter and meat processing industry—opportunities for improvements in future energy markets. Journal of Food Engineering, 77, 792–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurbuz, U., Ardic, M., & Calim, H. D. (2009). Microbiological characteristics of Turkish semi-dry fermented sausage during processing stages and storages. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8, 677–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • HTC. (2009). Red meat processing industry energy efficiency manual—electricity use in meat processing plants. Hydro Tasmania Consulting (HTC). Meat and Livestock Lda, Australia. http://www.redmeatinnovation.com.au/project-reports/report-categories/environment/red-meat-industry-energy-efficiency-manual. Accessed 11 July 2011.

  • INE. (2010). Annual survey on industrial production. Lisbon: Statistics Portugal (INE).

    Google Scholar 

  • INE. (2011). Statistical yearbook of Portugal. Lisbon: Statistics Portugal (INE).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPPC. (2005). Reference document on best available techniques in the slaughterhouses and animal by-products industries. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, European Commission. http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/sa_bref_0505.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2015.

  • IPPC. (2006). Reference document on best available techniques in the food, drink and milk industries. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, European Commission. http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/fdm_bref_0806.pdf. Accessed 18 August 2015.

  • James, S. J., & James, C. (2002). Meat refrigeration. Abington: Woodhead Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Colmenero, F., Ventanas, J., & Toldrá, F. (2009). Nutritional composition of dry-cured ham and its role in a healthy diet. Meat Science, 84, 585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAPA. (2005). Guía de Mejores Técnicas Disponibles en España del sector cárnico. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca Y Alimentación (MAPA). Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.

  • Marlow, J., & Colley, T. (2007). Environmental best practice guidelines for the red meat processing industry. Australia: Module 2 – Energy, Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxime, D., Marcotte, M., & Arcand, Y. (2006). Development of eco-efficiency indicators for the Canadian food and beverage industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 636–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanduri, M., Nyboer, J., & Jaccard, M. (2002). Aggregating physical intensity indicators: results of applying the composite indicator approach to the Canadian industrial sector. Energy Policy, 30, 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigel, S., Moran, D., Kim, E. J., & Thomas, C. (2010). The environmental impact of meat production systems. Report to the International Meat Secretariat. http://www.meat-ims.org/old-site/IMSReview-final-20710.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2011.

  • Nunes, J. (2014). Energetic efficiency evaluation in refrigeration systems of agrifood industries in the Beira Interior region. PhD thesis. University of Beira Interior. Covilhã, Portugal.

  • Nunes, J., Silva, Pedro D., & Andrade, L. P. (2011). Energetic efficiency evaluation in refrigeration systems of meat industries. In Proceedings of the 23rd IIR International Congress of Refrigeration: Refrigeration for Sustainable Development, Prague, Czech Republic.

  • Nunes, J., Neves, D., Gaspar, P. D., Silva, P. D., & Andrade, L. P. (2014). Predictive tool of energy performance of cold storage in agrifood industries: the Portuguese case study. Energy Conversion and Management, 88, 758–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagan, R., Renouf, M., & Prasad, P. (2002). Eco-efficiency manual for meat processing. Environmental Management Centre. University of Queensland. Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd.

  • Ramírez, C. A., Patel, M., & Blok, K. (2006). How much energy to process one pound of meat? A comparison of energy use and specific energy consumption in the meat industry of four European countries. Energy, 31, 2047–2063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, B. (2003). Fundamental food microbiology. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röhr, A., Lüddecke, K., Drusch, S., Müller, M. J., & Alvensleben, R. V. (2006). Food quality and safety—consumer perception and public health concern. Food Control, 16, 649–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savell, J. W., & Mueller, S. L. (2005). The chilling of carcasses. Meat Science, 70, 449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toldrá, F. (2002). Dry-cured meat products. Trumbull: Food &Nutrition Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toldrá, F. (2003). Dry-cured ham. In Y. H. Hui (Ed.), Handbook of animal-based fermented food and beverage technology (pp. 549–564). Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO. (2010). Global industrial energy efficiency benchmarking: an energy policy tool. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez, R. L., & Vanaclocha, A. C. (2004). Technology of slaughterhouses. Madrid: Mundi-Prensa Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, A., Pun, M., Khanona, J., & Aung, M. (2004). Consumer attitudes, knowledge and behaviour: a review of food safety issues. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 15, 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, 6001-909, Castelo Branco, Portugal

    José Nunes & Luís Pinto Andrade

  2. Engineering Faculty, University of Beira Interior, Rua Fonte do Lameiro, 6201-001, Covilhã, Portugal

    Pedro Dinho da Silva, Luísa Domingues & Pedro Dinis Gaspar

Authors
  1. José Nunes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro Dinho da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luís Pinto Andrade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luísa Domingues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pedro Dinis Gaspar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Dinho da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nunes, J., da Silva, P.D., Andrade, L.P. et al. Energy assessment of the Portuguese meat industry. Energy Efficiency 9, 1163–1178 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9414-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9414-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation