Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Green web applications as a climate change mitigation campaign instruments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An increasing number of Danish local governments use green web applications, which are websites intended to convince users to reduce energy consumption in order to mitigate climate change. However, to date, no empirical evidence has been published that demonstrates whether green web applications have this intended effect. This paper, based on a survey of 329 Danish small and medium enterprises (SMEs), examines the perceived effects of a green web application named klimabevidst.dk (which can be translated as climateawareness.dk) and explores the motivation of SMEs to use the application. As 29–56 % of SMEs declare that the application has had a medium or large energy reduction effect on their businesses, the paper concludes that klimebevidst.dk can be a relevant component in local government climate change mitigation campaigns aimed at small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This paper also shows that the perceived effects of using the web application correlate strongly with the extent to which the web application is used (i.e. with the number of the application’s energy reduction guides read). Moreover, the perceived effect is larger in smaller SMEs, in SMEs that prioritise climate change and the health of their employees, and in SMEs that do not prioritise economic benefits. The present study is, however, unable to quantify the reduction; further study is needed to produce a more refined picture of the role played by the web application in increasing energy efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to an interview with klimabevidst.dk’s owner, Thomas Mikkelsen

  2. Effect is seen across all statistical models (list-wise and include an increasing number of control variables)

  3. http://www.kl.dk/ImageVault/Images/id_61145/scope_0/ImageVaultHandler.aspx page 4.

References

  • Abrahamse, W., et al. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., et al. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S. (2003). Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behaviour. Area, 35(3), 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benders, R. M. J., et al. (2006). New approaches for household energy conservation—in search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. Energy Policy, 34(18), 3612–3622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, S. (2006). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays, 486, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulleck, U., & Kaufmann, S. (2004). Do customer information programs reduce household electricity demand?—the Irish program. Energy Policy, 32(8), 1025–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R., et al. (2014). Personalized energy priorities: a user-centric application for energy advice. Design, user experience, and usability. User experience design for everyday life applications and services, Springer: 542–553.

  • Gausset, Q. (2013). Comparing different approaches to addressing environmental behavioural change: a review of ten case studies from Denmark. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 12(1), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gausset, Q., et al. (2014). Environmental choices: hypocrisy, self-contradictions and the tyranny of everyday life. CIDEA Anthology. Gausset Q., and Hoff J (eds), Routledge (planned), accepted by editors.

  • Geller, E. S. (2002). The challenge of increasing proenvironment behavior. Handbook of Environmental Psychology: 525–540.

  • Gleerup, M., et al. (2010). The effect of feedback by text message (SMS) and email on household electricity consumption: experimental evidence. The Energy Journal, 31(3), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, K., et al. (2013). A historical perspective of global warming potential from municipal solid waste management. Waste Management (New York), 33(9), 1926–1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, J. and Ellesgaard A. (2012). CIDEA projekt rapport, Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet.

  • Hoff, J. and Strobel B. W. (2013). A municipal‘climate revolution’? The shaping of municipal climate change policies. Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 12(1).

  • Howell, R. A. (2014). Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals’ attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 70–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, R., et al. (2000). Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24(2), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanken, B., et al. (1994). Attitude versus general habit: antecedents of travel mode Choice1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., et al. (2007). Residential and commercial buildings. Climate change 2007; mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • McClelland, L., & Cook, S. W. (1980). Promoting energy conservation in master‐metered apartments through group financial Incentives1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(1), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMakin, A. H., et al. (2002). Motivating residents to conserve energy without financial incentives. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 848–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollenbach, E., et al. (2012). HCI and sustainability: the role of macrostructures. CHI’12 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, ACM.

  • Nielsen, L. (1993). How to get the birds in the bush into your hand: results from a Danish research project on electricity savings. Energy Policy, 21(11), 1133–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papazu, I. and Scheele C. E. (2014). Changing individual behaviour or creating green societies? Advancing from a behaviourist to a social practice theory approach. CIDEA anthology. Q. Gausset and J. Hoff. Routledge, Earthscan.

  • Perloff, R. M. (2014). The dynamics of persuasion. Communication and attitudes in 21st century. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R. G., & Pan, M. J. (2005). Knowledge representation in the semantic web for Earth and environmental terminology (SWEET). Computers & Geosciences, 31(9), 1119–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner, S., et al. (2011). European smart metering landscape report. Osterreichishe Energieagentur, Austrian Energy Agency, Smart Regions Deliverable 2(1).

  • Scheele, C. E. (2011). CIDEA rapport 2.

  • Scheele, C. E. and Papazu I. (2014). (De)-localising the climate: the production of uncertain agencies through climate websites. STS Encounters-DASTS working paper series.

  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatisticsDenmark (2014). www.dst.dk. Retrieved 01-07-2014, 2014.

  • Van Houwelingen, J. H. and Van Raaij W. F. (1989). The effect of goal-setting and daily electronic feedback on in-home energy use. Journal of Consumer Research, 98–105.

  • Vinther, D., et al. (2011). Hovedrapport for Smart Grid Netværkets arbejde, Klima-, Energi-og Bygningsministeriet.

  • Voinov, A., & Costanza, R. (1999). Watershed management and the web. Journal of Environmental Management, 56(4), 231–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warriner, G. K., et al. (1984). Any data or none at all? Living with inaccuracies in self-reports of residential energy consumption. Environment and Behavior, 16(4), 503–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winett, R. A., et al. (1982). The effectiveness of an energy specialist and extension agents in promoting summer energy conservation by home visits. Journal of Environmental Systems, 12(1), 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J., et al. (1996). Visualization over the World Wide Web and its application to environmental data. Proceedings of the 7th conference on Visualization’96. IEEE Computer Society Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Elling Scheele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheele, C.E. Green web applications as a climate change mitigation campaign instruments. Energy Efficiency 8, 759–771 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-014-9320-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-014-9320-4

Keywords

Navigation