Advertisement

Energy Efficiency

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 303–322 | Cite as

Defining zero carbon and zero energy homes from a performance-based regulatory perspective

  • Stephen BerryEmail author
  • Kathryn Davidson
  • Wasim Saman
Original Article

Abstract

The development of a framework for defining net zero energy and net zero carbon homes has seen significant progress over the past decade. With anthropogenic climate change the principal driver, numerous governments are moving to regulate homes at or near a net zero energy or net zero carbon performance level. What has been missing in the literature is a discussion of how the basic principles of performance-based building regulation will shape the definition. The very nature of performance-based regulation as a legally contestable instrument shapes and limits the content of a regulatory definition. This paper examines the recent literature on zero energy and zero carbon building definition frameworks, explores the key characteristics of performance-based standards and determines practical definitions that could be adopted within performance-based building codes.

Keywords

Zero energy Zero carbon Residential building Energy efficiency Performance-based regulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the advice and support of Dr Nick Eyre, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford and the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments in preparing this paper.

References

  1. Australian Building Codes Board. (2006). Intergovernmental agreement on building regulation. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Building Codes Board. (2009). Proposal to revise the energy efficiency requirements of the BCA for residential buildings: regulation impact statement. Canberra: Australian Building Codes Board.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001). Australian Housing Survey 4186.0. Canberra: Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Greenhouse Office. (1999). Scoping study of minimum energy performance requirements for incorporation into the building code of Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Greenhouse Office. (2006). Scoping study to investigate measures for improving the environmental sustainability of building materials. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  6. AusZEH (2010). Australian zero emission demonstration house. Melbourne: AusZEHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bambrook, S., Sproul, A., & Jacob, D. (2011). Design optimisation for a low energy home in Sydney. Energy and Buildings, 43(7), 1702–1711. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bi, P., Williams, S., Loughnan, M., Lloyd, G., Hansen, A., Kjellstrom, T., et al. (2011). The effects of extreme heat on human mortality and morbidity in Australia: implications for public health. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 23.Google Scholar
  9. Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blengini, G. A., & Di Carlo, T. (2010). The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings. Energy and Buildings, 42(6), 869–880. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boer, K. W. (2001). 30 Years hands-on experiences in solar heating, PV, and hybrid systems. Advances in Solar Energy, 14, 229–286.Google Scholar
  12. Building Products Innovation Council. (2011). Introduction to life cycle assessment of building products. Sydney: Building Products Innovation Council.Google Scholar
  13. Buildings Performance Institute Europe. (2011). Principles for nearly zero-energy buildings. Brussels: Buildings Performance Institute Europe.Google Scholar
  14. Buildings Performance Institute Europe. (2013). Building policies and programs in the EU-27. Report within the Intelligent Energy Europe project ENTRANZE-Policies to Enforce the Transition to Nearly Zero Energy Buildings in the EU-27 (March 2013 update). Brussels: Buildings Performance Institute Europe.Google Scholar
  15. Butti, K., & Perlin, J. (1980). A golden thread: 2500 years of solar architecture and technology. New York: Cheshire Books.Google Scholar
  16. Casals, X. G. (2006). Analysis of building energy regulation and certification in Europe: their role, limitations and differences. Energy and Buildings, 38(5), 381–392. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chalfoun, N., Cardona, V., & Franz-Ünder, R. (2011). Using computer simulation as a tool to develop a net-zero energy code for Tucson, Arizona. Paper presented at the Building Simulation 2011, Sydney, Australia, 14–16 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  18. Chow, Y. (2008). How ‘zero’is a ‘zero carbon home’? A comprehensive assessment of a zero carbon home. Paper presented at the World Sustainable Buildings Conference, Melbourne, Australia, September 2008.Google Scholar
  19. CSIRO. (2007). Climate change in Australia: technical report 2007. Canberra: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.Google Scholar
  20. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. (2010). Report of the Prime Minister’s Task Group on Energy Efficiency. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Department of Communities and Local Government. (2006). Building a greener future: towards zero carbon development. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  22. Department of Communities and Local Government. (2007). Building a greener future: policy statement. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  23. Department of the Environment Water Heritage and the Arts. (2008). Energy use in the Australian residential sector 1986–2020. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  24. Energy Saving Trust. (2009). Location, location, location. Domestic small-scale wind field trial report (vol. 24). London: Energy Saving Trust.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission. (2010). Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  26. Ferrante, A., & Cascella, M. T. (2011). Zero energy balance and zero on-site CO2 emission housing development in the Mediterranean climate. Energy and Buildings, 43(8), 2002–2010. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foliente, G. (2000). Developments in performance-based building codes and standards. Forest Products Journal, 50(7–8), 12–21.Google Scholar
  28. Foliente, G., Leicester, R., & Pham, L. (1998). Development of the CIB Proactive Program on Performance-based Building Codes and Standards. (Vol. 98, pp. 232). Melbourne: CSIRO Building, Construction and EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  29. Geoscience Australia, & ABARE (2010). Australian Energy Resource Assessment. Canberra: Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenwood, D. (2012). The challenge of policy coordination for sustainable sociotechnical transitions: the case of the zero-carbon homes agenda in England. Environment and Planning-Part C, 30(1), 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guy, S. (2006). Designing urban knowledge: competing perspectives on energy and buildings. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(5), 645–659. doi: 10.1068/c0607j.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hall, M. (2012). One year MINERGIE-A: Switzerlands big step towards net ZEB. Paper presented at the Zemch International Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 2012Google Scholar
  33. Hansen, A., Bi, P., Nitschke, M., Ryan, P., Pisaniello, D., & Tucker, G. (2008). The effect of heat waves on mental health in a temperate Australian City. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(10).Google Scholar
  34. Heinze, M., & Voss, K. (2009). Goal: zero energy building: Exemplary experience based on the solar estate solarsiedlung freiburg am schlierberg, Germany. Journal of Green Building, 4(4), 93–100. doi: 10.3992/jgb.4.4.93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hernandez, P., & Kenny, P. (2008). Zero energy houses and embodied energy: Regulatory and design considerations. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Energy Sustainability, Jacksonville, FL, August 2008Google Scholar
  36. Hernandez, P., & Kenny, P. (2010). From net energy to zero energy buildings: defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB). Energy and Buildings, 42(6), 815–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hernandez, P., & Kenny, P. (2011). Development of a methodology for life cycle building energy ratings. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3779–3788. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoque, S. (2010). Net zero energy homes: an evaluation of two homes in the northeastern United States. Journal of Green Building, 5(2), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. International Energy Agency. (2010). Towards net zero energy solar buildings: IEA SHC /ECBCS Project Factsheet. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  40. Iwaro, J., & Mwasha, A. (2010). Implications of building energy standard for sustainable energy efficient design in buildings. IJEE, 1(5), 745–756. www.IJEE.IEEFoundation.org.Google Scholar
  41. Jagemar, L., Schmidt, M., Allard, F., Heiselberg, P., & Kurnitski, J. (2011). Towards nZEB—some examples of national requirements and roadmaps. REHVA Journal, 48(3), 14–17.Google Scholar
  42. Janda, K. B. (2008). Worldwide status of energy standards for buildings: A 2007 update. Paper presented at the Improving Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings Conference, Frankfurt, Germany, April 2008Google Scholar
  43. Kansara, T., & Ridley, I. (2012). Post occupancy evaluation of buildings in a zero carbon city. Sustainable Cities and Society. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2012.05.010.Google Scholar
  44. Kapsalaki, M., & Leal, V. (2011). Recent progress on net zero energy buildings. Advances in Building Energy Research, 5(1), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Land Management Corporation (2011). Zero carbon challenge. http://www.lmc.sa.gov.au/zerocarbonchallenge. Accessed 8 June 2012
  46. Laustsen, M. J. (2008). Energy efficiency requirements in building codes, energy efficiency policies for new buildings. Paris: International Energy Agency and OECD.Google Scholar
  47. Leckner, M., & Zmeureanu, R. (2011). Life cycle cost and energy analysis of a net zero energy house with solar combisystem. Applied Energy, 88(1), 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lovell, H. (2009). The role of individuals in policy change: the case of UK low-energy housing. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(3), 491–511. doi: 10.1068/c0878j.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marszal, A. J., Bourrelle, J. S., Musall, E., Heiselberg, P., Gustavsen, A., & Voss, K. (2010). Net Zero Energy Buildings-Calculation Methodologies versus National Building Codes. Paper presented at the EuroSun 2010 Graz, Austria, September 2010Google Scholar
  50. Marszal, A. J., & Heiselberg, P. (2009). A literature review of zero energy buildings (ZEB) definitions. Aalborg: Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  51. Marszal, A. J., Heiselberg, P., Bourrelle, J. S., Musall, E., Voss, K., Sartori, I., et al. (2011). Zero energy building—a review of definitions and calculation methodologies. Energy and Buildings, 43(4), 971–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McLeod, R. S., Hopfe, C. J., & Rezgui, Y. (2012). An investigation into recent proposals for a revised definition of zero carbon homes in the UK. Energy Policy, 46, 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meacham, B. (2009). Performance-based building regulatory systems: principles and experiences (I.-j. R. C. Committee, Trans.). Inter-jurisdictional Regulatory Collaboration CommitteeGoogle Scholar
  54. Meacham, B., Bowen, R., Traw, J., & Moore, A. (2005). Performance-based building regulation: current situation and future needs. Building Research & Information, 33(2), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller, W., & Buys, L. (2012). Anatomy of a sub-tropical positive energy home (PEH). Solar Energy, 86(1), 231–241. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.09.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mlecnik, E. (2012). Defining nearly zero-energy housing in Belgium and the Netherlands. Energy Efficiency, 5(3), 411–431. doi: 10.1007/s12053-011-9138-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Newton, P., & Tucker, S. (2009). Hybrid buildings: pathways for greenhouse gas mitigation in the housing sector. Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology.Google Scholar
  58. Nitschke, M., Tucker, G. R., & Bi, P. (2007). Morbidity and mortality during heatwaves in metropolitan Adelaide. Medical Journal of Australia, 187(11–12), 662–665.Google Scholar
  59. Oleszkiewicz, I. (1994). The concept and practice of performance-based building regulations. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar
  60. Razykov, T., Ferekides, C., Morel, D., Stefanakos, E., Ullal, H., & Upadhyaya, H. (2011). Solar photovoltaic electricity: current status and future prospects. Solar Energy, 85(8), 1580–1608. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2010.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Research for Energy Optimized Building (2013). International projects on carbon neutral buildings. http://www.enob.info/en/net-zero-energy-buildings/international-projects/. Accessed 10 Jan 2013
  62. Riedy, C., Lederwasch, A., & Ison, N. (2011). Defining zero emission buildings—review and recommendations: final report. Sydney: Institute for Sustainable Futures.Google Scholar
  63. Rijal, H. B., & Stevenson, F. (2010). Thermal comfort in UK housing to avoid overheating: lessons from a ‘Zero Carbon’ case study. Paper presented at the NCEUB Conference: Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort, April 2010Google Scholar
  64. Saman, W. (2010). Towards zero energy homes down under. Paper presented at the World Renewable Energy Congress XI, Abu Dhabi, September 2010Google Scholar
  65. Saniotis, A., & Bi, P. (2009). Global warming and Australian public health: reasons to be concerned. Australian Health Review, 33(4), 611–617. doi: 10.1071/ah090611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sartori, I., & Hestnes, A. G. (2007). Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article. Energy and Buildings, 39(3), 249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sartori, I., Napolitano, A., & Voss, K. (2012). Net zero energy buildings: a consistent definition framework. Energy and Buildings, 48, 220–232. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.01.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schimschar, S., Blok, K., Boermans, T., & Hermelink, A. (2011). Germany’s path towards nearly zero-energy buildings—enabling the greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the building stock. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3346–3360. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schipper, L., Ketoff, A., & Kahane, A. (1985). Explaining residential energy use by international bottom-up comparisons. Annual Review of Energy, 10(1), 341–405. doi: 10.1146/annurev.eg.10.110185.002013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shapps, G. (2011). Buildings and the environment: statement by the Minister for Housing and Local Government London: Department of Communities and Local GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  71. Skaar, C. (2008). A discussion of the problems and potentials in the implementation of zero-carbon homes, and the measures and possible route maps for the achievement of the government target that “every new home will be zero-carbon” by 2016. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
  72. Srinivasan, R. S., Braham, W. W., Campbell, D. E., & Curcija, C. D. (2012). Re(De)fining net zero energy: renewable emergy balance in environmental building design. Building and Environment, 47, 300–315. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sujana, W., Noguchi, M., & Barr, E. (2009). Review of obstacles to the delivery of affordable zero-carbon homes in Scotland. Glasgow: Mackintosh School of Architecture.Google Scholar
  74. Szalay, A. Z. (2007). What is missing from the concept of the new European Building Directive? Building and Environment, 42(4), 1761–1769. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Torcellini, P., Pless, S., Deru, M., & Crawley, D. (2006). Zero energy buildings: a critical look at the definition. Paper presented at the ACEEE Summer Study, Pacific Grove, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  76. Tweed, C., & McLeod, R. (2008). Meeting the 2011 zero carbon buildings target for Wales using the Passivhaus standard. Paper presented at the PLEA Conference, Dublin, October 2008Google Scholar
  77. Vaneckova, P., Beggs, P. J., de Dear, R. J., & McCracken, K. W. J. (2008). Effect of temperature on mortality during the six warmer months in Sydney, Australia, between 1993 and 2004. Environmental Research, 108(3), 361–369. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Voss, K., Musall, E., & Lichtmess, M. (2011). From low-energy to net zero-energy buildings: status and perspectives. Journal of Green Building, 6(1), 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wang, L., Gwilliam, J., & Jones, P. (2009). Case study of zero energy house design in UK. Energy and Buildings, 41(11), 1215–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Webb, A. (2007). The viability of domestic wind turbines for urban Melbourne. Melbourne: Alternative Technology Association.Google Scholar
  81. Williams, J. (2009). Zero carbon homes—myth or reality? Paper presented at the IOP Conference—climate change: global risks, challenges and decisions, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  82. Zero Carbon Hub. (2011). Carbon compliance: setting an appropriate limit for zero carbon new homes. London, UK: Zero Carbon Hub.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barbara Hardy InstituteUniversity of South Australia, Mawson LakesAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations