Energy Efficiency

, 2:411 | Cite as

The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy

  • Terry BarkerEmail author
  • Athanasios Dagoumas
  • Jonathan Rubin
Original Research


This paper examines the macroeconomic rebound effect for the global economy arising from energy-efficiency policies. Such policies are expected to be a leading component of climate policy portfolios being proposed and adopted in order to achieve climate stabilisation targets for 2020, 2030 and 2050, such as the G8 50% reduction target by 2050. We apply the global “New Economics” or Post Keynesian model E3MG, developing the version reported in IPCC AR4 WG3. The rebound effect refers to the idea that some or all of the expected reductions in energy consumption as a result of energy-efficiency improvements are offset by an increasing demand for energy services, arising from reductions in the effective price of energy services resulting from those improvements. As policies to stimulate energy-efficiency improvements are a key part of climate-change policies, the likely magnitude of any rebound effect is of great importance to assessing the effectiveness of those policies. The literature distinguishes three types of rebound effect from energy-efficiency improvements: direct, indirect and economy-wide. The macroeconomic rebound effect, which is the focus of this paper, is the combination of the indirect and economy-wide effects. Estimates of the effects of no-regrets efficiency policies are reported by the International Energy Agency in World Energy Outlook, 2006, and synthesised in the IPCC AR4 WG3 report. We analyse policies for the transport, residential and services buildings and industrial sectors of the economy for the post-2012 period, 2013–2030. The estimated direct rebound effect, implicit in the IEA WEO/IPCC AR4 estimates, is treated as exogenous, based on estimates from the literature, globally about 10%. The total rebound effect, however, is 31% by 2020 rising to 52% by 2030. The total effect includes the direct effect and the effects of (1) the lower cost of energy on energy demand in the three broad sectors as well as of (2) the extra consumers’ expenditure from higher (implicit) real income and (3) the extra energy-efficiency investments. The rebound effects build up over time as the economic system adapts to the higher real incomes from the energy savings and the investments.


Rebound effect Energy efficiency Macroeconomic modelling Top-down/bottom-up modelling Post-2012 policies 



This paper has been prepared as a contribution to the research of the UK Energy Research Centre and the UK Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. The authors are grateful for the support of the Centres and their funding from the UK Research Councils.


  1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  2. ADAM D-M2.1. (2007). Portfolio of policy and technological options for P3a case study.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D., & Winne, S. (2004). 'Modelling innovation and threshold effects in climate change mitigation', Working Paper No. 59, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
  4. Barker, T. (2008). ‘The economics of dangerous climate change”. Editorial for the Special Issue of Climatic Change on “The Stern Review and its Critics”. Climatic Change, 89, 173–194. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9433-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, T. S., Ekins, P., & Johnstone, N. (1995). Global Warming and Energy Demand. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, T., Pan, H., Köhler, J., Warren, R., & Winne, S. (2006). Decarbonizing the Global Economy with Induced Technological Change: Scenarios to 2100 using E3MG. In O. Edenhofer, K. Lessmann, K. Kemfert, M. Grubb, & J. Köhler (Eds.), Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization Energy Journal Special Issue on the International Model Comparison Project.Google Scholar
  7. Barker, T., Ekins, P., & Foxon, T. (2007). The macroeconomic rebound effect and the UK economy. Energy Policy, 35, 4935–4946. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentzen, J., & Engsted, T. (1993). Short- and long-run elasticities in energy demand: a cointegration approach. Energy Economics, 15(1), 9–16. doi: 10.1016/0140-9883(93)90037-R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BERR ER (2006). Energy review. Overarching initial regulatory impact assessment, Department for Business & Regulatory Reform,
  10. BERR EWP (2007). Meeting the energy challenge. A white paper on energy, Department for Business & Regulatory Reform,
  11. Brookes, L. (1990). The Greenhouse Effect: Fallacies in the energy efficiency solution. Energy Policy, 18, 199–201. doi: 10.1016/0301-4215(90)90145-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeCanio, S. (2003). Economic Models of Climate Change: A Critique. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dimitropoulos, J. (2007). Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: An overview of the state of knowledge. Energy Policy, 35, 6354–6363. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franzén, M., & Sterner, T. (1995). Long-run Demand Elasticities for Gasoline. In T. Barker, N. Johnstone & P. Ekins (Eds.), Global Warming and Energy Elasticities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Geller, H., Harrington, P., Rosenfeld, A. H., Tanishimad, S., & Unander, F. (2006). Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 34, 556–573. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greening, L., Greene, D. L., & Difiglio, C. (2000). Energy Efficiency and Consumption - The Rebound Effect - A Survey. Energy Policy, 28, 389–401. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grepperud, S., & Rasmussen, I. (2004). A general equilibrium assessment of rebound effects. Energy Economics, 26, 261–282. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2003.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grubb, M. (1990). Energy efficiency and economic fallacies. Energy Policy, 18, 783–785. doi: 10.1016/0301-4215(90)90031-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herring, H. (2004). The rebound effect and energy conservation. In C. Cleveland (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Energy. Academic Press/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  20. Herring, H., & Sorrell, S. (2009). Energy efficiency and sustainable consumption. The Rebound Effect, Macmillan Publishers Limited.Google Scholar
  21. Holt, R. (2007). What is Post Keynesian economics? In M. Forstater, G. Mongiovi & S. Pressman (Eds.), Post Keynesian macroeconomics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hunt, L., & Manning, N. (1989). Energy price- and income-elasticities of demand: some estimates for the UK using the cointegration procedure. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 36(2), 183–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.1989.tb01085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. International Energy Agency (Ed.) (2005). The Experience with Energy Efficiency Policies and Programmes in IEA Countries. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
  24. International Energy Agency (Ed.) (2006). World Energy Outook 2006 (IEA WEO 2006). Paris: IEAGoogle Scholar
  25. International Energy Agency (Ed.) (2007). World Energy Outook 2007 (IEA WEO 2007). Paris: IEAGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC AR4. (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report,
  27. Jevons, W. S. (1865/1905). The Coal Question: An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of our Coal-mines. In A. W. Flux, & A. M. Kelley (Eds.), 3rd Edition 1905. ed. New York.Google Scholar
  28. Johansson, O., & Schipper, L. (1997). Measuring the long-run fuel demand of cars. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, XXXI(3), 277–292.Google Scholar
  29. Kaldor, N. (1957). A model of economic growth. The Economic Journal, 67, 591–624. doi: 10.2307/2227704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaldor, N. (1972). The irrelevance of equilibrium economics. The Economic Journal, 52, 1237–1255. doi: 10.2307/2231304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaldor, N. (1985). Economics without Equilibrium. UK: Cardiff.Google Scholar
  32. Khazzoom, J. D. (1980). Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energy Journal, 1(4), 21–40.Google Scholar
  33. McCombie, J. M., & Thirlwall, A. P. (1994). Economic Growth and the Balance of Payments Constraint. New York: St Martin’s.Google Scholar
  34. McCombie, J. M., & Thirlwall, A. P. (2004). Essays on Balance of Payments Constrained Growth: Theory and Evidence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Palley, T. I. (2003). Pitfalls in the theory of growth: an application to the balance of payments constrained growth model. Review of Political Economy, 15(1), 75–84. doi: 10.1080/09538250308441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. doi: 10.1086/261725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saunders, H. (1992). The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy Journal, 13, 131–149.Google Scholar
  39. Saunders, H. (2000). A view from the Macro Side: Rebound, Backfire and Khazzoom-Brookes. Energy Policy, 28, 439–449. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00024-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saunders, H. D. (2008). Fuel conserving (and using) production function. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2184–2235. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schipper, L., & Grubb, M. (2000). On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy, 28, 367–388. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00018-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scott, M. (1989). A New View of Economic Growth. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  43. Serletis, A. (1992). Unit root behaviour in energy future prices. The Economic Journal, 13(2), 119–128.Google Scholar
  44. Setterfield, M. (ed). (2002). The Economics of Demand-led Growth—Challenging the Supply-side Vision of the Long Run. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  45. Small, K. A., & Van Dender, K. (2007). Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect. The Energy Journal, 28(1), 25–52.Google Scholar
  46. Solow, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. doi: 10.2307/1884513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Solow, R. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320. doi: 10.2307/1926047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. London: UK Energy Research Centre.Google Scholar
  49. Sorrell, S., & Dimitropoulos, J. (2007). The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics, 65, 636–649. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., & Sommerville, M. (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1356–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Treasury, H. M. (2006). Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
  52. US DfT. (2008). Preliminary regulatory impact analysis: corporate average fuel economy for my 2011–2015 passenger cars and light trucks. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, National Highway Safety Administration, Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation, National Centre for Statistics and Analysis.Google Scholar
  53. Vikström, P. (2004). Energy efficiency and energy demand: A historical CGE Investigation on the rebound effect in the Swedish economy 1957. Umeå: Umeå University.Google Scholar
  54. Wei, T. (2006). Impact of energy efficiency gains on output and energy use with Cobb–Douglas production function. Energy Policy, 35(4), 2023–2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weyant, J. P. (2004). Introduction and overview: energy economics special issue EMF 19 study Technology and Global Climate Change Policies. Energy Economics, 26, 501–515. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Young, A. (1928). Increasing returns and economic progress. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 527–542. doi: 10.2307/2224097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terry Barker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Athanasios Dagoumas
    • 1
  • Jonathan Rubin
    • 2
  1. 1.Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (4CMR), Department of Land EconomyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.School of EconomicsUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations