Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical prediction of largely separated flows in low-pressure turbine blades with high loading

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-pressure turbine blades pose a great challenge for designers as they are highly loaded and are prone to large flow separations at sufficiently low Reynolds numbers, typically at higher altitudes. Simulating these flows is computationally challenging due to the limitations of turbulence models in predicting laminar separations and subsequent transitions. Current work assesses the ability of the widely used \(k_T\text{- }k_L\text{- }\omega \) turbulence model for the prediction of the separation region in two different Pratt & Whitney blades, T106-A and Pak-B, at different loadings. Unlike most simulations reported in the literature, current work utilizes a multiblock structured grid on a computational domain where suction and pressure sides are separated by pitch-wise distance. This meshing approach helps in capturing the leading and trailing edge curvatures, apart from improved accuracy with a structured grid approach. The computed results are compared with experimental data as well as available numerical results. For the T106-A blade flow at inlet Reynolds number \(Re\simeq 50{,}000\), RANS simulation successfully predicts the separation and reattachment on the suction side very accurately. On the Pak-B blade, steady RANS simulations are performed for two inlet Reynolds numbers: 50,000 and 100,000. The pressure coefficient matches very well with the experimental data for the higher Re, but disagreements are found in the prediction of separation bubble size in the aft region of the suction side for \(Re=50{,}000\). Some discrepancies are consistently observed in the predictions of wake losses downstream of both blades, suggesting limitations of RANS models in steady-state simulations in predicting wake mixing. It is noted that unsteady simulations reduce the wake error and predict better mixing, apart from improvements in predictions of boundary layer parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C :

Chord length [m]

\(C_{ax}\) :

Axial Chord length [m]

p :

Pitch [m]

s :

Solidity [C/p]

V :

Velocity [ms\(^{-1}\)]

\(Re_1\) :

Inlet Reynolds number [\(\frac{\rho _1 u_1 C}{\mu _1}\)]

\(Re_{2is}\) :

Isentropic exit Reynolds number [\(\frac{\rho _2 u_2 C}{\mu _2}\)]

\(Ma_{2is}\) :

Isentropic exit Mach number [\(\frac{u_2}{\sqrt{\gamma R T_2}}\)]

\(\gamma \) :

Stagger angle [\(^\circ \)]

\(\beta _{1}\) :

Inlet flow angle [\(^\circ \)]

\(\beta _{2}\) :

Outlet flow angle [\(^\circ \)]

\(P_{t1}\) :

Total pressure at inlet [Pa]

\(P_{1}\) :

Static pressure at inlet [Pa]

\(P_{2}\) :

Static pressure at outlet [Pa]

\(T_{2}\) :

Temperature at outlet [K]

\(\zeta \) :

Total pressure loss coefficient [\(\frac{P_{t1} - P_{t}}{\Delta P}\)]

\(\epsilon \) :

Dissipation [m\(^2\)s\(^{-3}\)]

\(k_T\) :

Turbulent kinetic energy [m\(^2\)s\(^{-2}\)]

\(k_L\) :

Laminar kinetic energy [m\(^2\)s\(^{-2}\)]

\(\omega \) :

Specific rate of dissipation [s\(^{-1}\)]

\(l_m\) :

Turbulent length scale [m]

References

  1. Ashpis D E 2002 The nasa low-pressure turbine flow physics program: A review. In: Minnowbrook III: 2000 Workshop on Boundary Layer Transition and Unsteady Aspects of Turbomachinery Flows

  2. Hodson H P and Howell R J 2005 The role of transition in high-lift low-pressure turbines for aeroengines. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 41(6): 419–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hatman A and Wang T 1998 Separated-flow transition: Part 1–experimental methodology and mode classification. In: Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air volume 78620 page V001T01A107 American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  4. Malkiel E and Mayle R E 1996 Transition in a Separation Bubble. Journal of Turbomachinery 118(4): 752–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahallati A, McAuliffe B R, Sjolander S A and Praisner T J 2013 Aerodynamics of a low-pressure turbine airfoil at low Reynolds numbers-Part I: Steady flow measurements. Journal of turbomachinery 135(1): 011010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dick E and Kubacki S 2017 Transition models for turbomachinery boundary layer flows: a review. International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power 2(2): 4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walters D K and Cokljat D 2008 A Three-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Model for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Transitional Flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering 130(12): 121401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Langtry R B and Menter F R 2009 Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes. AIAA Journal 47(12): 2894–2906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pacciani R, Marconcini M, Arnone A and Bertini F 2013 Predicting high-lift LP turbine cascades flows using transition-sensitive turbulence closures. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection

  10. Menter F and Langtry R 2012 Transition modelling for turbomachinery flows. Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics and Transition pages 31–58

  11. Akolekar H D, Zhao Y, Sandberg R D and Pacciani R 2021 Integration of machine learning and computational fluid dynamics to develop turbulence models for improved low-pressure turbine wake mixing prediction. Journal of Turbomachinery 143(12)

  12. Saha G and Ranjan R 2021 Transition modelling for flow separation in low-pressure turbine cascades. In: Proceedings of the 48th National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power (FMFP)

  13. Rajparaand S and Ranjan R 2022 Rans modelling for short and long separation bubbles in flow past low-pressure turbine cascades. In: Aerospace and Associated Technology pages 535–540 Routledge

  14. Stadtmüller P 2001 Investigation of wake-induced transition on the LP turbine cascade T106A-EIZ. DFG-Verbundprojekt Fo 136(11)

  15. Ranjan R, Deshpande S and Narasimha R 2017 New insights from high-resolution compressible dns studies on an LPT blade boundary layer. Computers & Fluids 153: 49–60

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Akolekar H D, Weatheritt J, Hutchins N, Sandberg R D, Laskowski G and Michelassi V 2019 Development and use of machine-learnt algebraic Reynolds stress models for enhanced prediction of wake mixing in low-pressure turbines. Journal of Turbomachinery 141(4)

  17. Lake J P 1999 Flow Separation Prevention on a Turbine Blade in Cascade at Low Reynolds Number. Ph.D. thesis Air Force Institute of Technology, WPAFB, OH, AFIT-DS-ENY-99-01

  18. Sondergaard R, Rivir R B and Bons J P 2002 Control of low-pressure turbine separation using vortex-generator jets. Journal of Propulsion and Power 18(4): 889–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dorney D J, Lake J P, King P I and Ashpis D E 2000 Experimental and numerical investigation of losses in low-pressure turbine blade rows. International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines 17(4): 241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang J, Corke T C and Thomas F O 2006 Plasma actuators for separation control of low-pressure turbine blades. AIAA Journal 44(1): 51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rizzetta D and Visbal M 2003 Numerical investigation of transitional flow through a low-pressure turbine cascade. In: 33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit page 3587

  22. Choi S M, Kim J, Bang M, Kim J and Cho H H 2018 Effect of the wake on the heat transfer of a turbine blade endwall according to relative position of the cylindrical rod. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 94: 61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu X and Wang X 2011 Performance improvement of low pressure turbine blade by using synthetic jets. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 5(4): 445–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arko B M and McQuilling M 2013 Computational study of high-lift low-pressure turbine cascade aerodynamics at low Reynolds number. Journal of Propulsion and Power 29(2): 446–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders D D, O’Brien W F, Sondergaard R, Polanka M D and Rabe D C 2011 Predicting separation and transitional flow in turbine blades at low Reynolds numbers-part II: The application to a highly separated turbine blade cascade geometry. Journal of Turbomachinery 133(3)

  26. Gross A and Fasel H 2005 Numerical investigation of low-pressure turbine blade separation control. AIAA Journal 43(12): 2514–2525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Garmoe T 2005 Characterization of the GH1R Low Pressure Turbine. Master’s thesis Air Force Institute of Technology, WPAFB, OH, AFIT/DS/ENY/05-S02

  28. Casey J P 2004 Effect of dimple pattern on the suppression of boundary layer separation on a low-pressure turbine blade. Master’s thesis Air Force Institute of Technology, WPAFB, OH, AFIT/GAE/ENY/04-M05

  29. Woods N, Boxx I, Sondergaard R, McQuilling M and Wolff M 2006 Investigation of separation control in low pressure turbine using pulsed vortex generator jets. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit page 4450

  30. Mahallati A and Sjolander S A 2013 Aerodynamics of a low-pressure turbine airfoil at low Reynolds numbers-Part II: blade-wake interaction. Journal of Turbomachinery 135(1): 011011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

RR acknowledges the support from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur (India) through the Initiation Grant. Unsteady simulations were performed using the HPC2013 Cluster at IIT Kanpur.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh Ranjan.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, K., Ranjan, R. Numerical prediction of largely separated flows in low-pressure turbine blades with high loading. Sādhanā 49, 61 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02376-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02376-w

Keywords

Navigation