Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimizing and investigating durability performance of sandy soils stabilized with alkali activated waste tuff-fly ash mixtures

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The search for alternative environmentally-friendly materials to Portland cement is increasing its importance in geotechnical engineering as in other fields. In this study, alkali activated waste volcanic tuff (BT) and fly ash (FA) utilized as an alternative to conventional binders. The specific objectives of this paper were to, (1) optimize fly ash, waste tuff and activator content using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), (2) investigate the UCS performance of the optimum amount of alkali-activated fly ash and waste tuff mixtures as a binder in soil stabilization by comparing with various codes, (3) characterize the optimized parameters, (4) examine durability performances of the samples. Optimum binder and activator content and effect of waste tuff on strength characteristics were evaluated statistically with RSM approach. XRF, XRD, FTIR analyses were performed to verify the synthesized alkali activated material in the inner structures of the optimized samples. The durability and mechanical properties of samples stabilized with alkali activated binders against soaking condition, wetting-drying and were investigated. Destructive and non-destructive methods were employed to examine mechanical and durability characteristics. Unconfined compression strength, strength reduction ratio, soil deterioration, and water absorption capacity was taken into account to evaluate durability performances. UCS values of the stabilized samples were compared with limit UCS values suggested by several standards. As a result of the study it was determined that alkali activated waste tuff and fly ash mixture shows significant mechanical and durability performance in soil stabilization, and capable to use as an alternative to conventional non-green binders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zarei C, Wang F, Qiu P, Fang P and Liu Y 2022 Laboratory investigations on geotechnical characteristics of albumen treated loess soil. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 26: 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-1723-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamiloglu H A and Turan H 2021 An investigation of the effect of curing temperature on the deformation characteristics of the stabilized soil layers treated with lime and tuff wastes with response surface method. Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 46: 1669–1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00697-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karim A M, Ibrahim O M and Amer M I 2021 Dynamic Response of Stabilized Soft Clay Under Cyclic Loading at Low Shear Strain Level. In: Shehata, H., Badr, M. (eds) Advancements in Geotechnical Engineering. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62908-3_13

  4. Daghigh H, Mousavi Jahromi S H, Khosrojerdi A and HassanpourDarvishi H 2022 Effect of curing time and percentage of additive materials on unconfined compressive strength and California bearing ratio in sandy silt soil. Sādhanā 47: 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01790-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo R, Wang J, Bing L, Tong D, Ciais P, Davis S J, Andrew R M, Fengming X and Liu Z 2021 Global CO2 uptake by cement from 1930 to 2019. Earth. Syst. Sci. Data 13: 1791–1805. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1791-2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Çelik A G 2022 Investigation of microstructure and physicomechanical properties of boron belit cement mortars containing blast furnace slag as alternative to Portland cement. Sādhanā 47: 233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-02004-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amer A A and El-Hoseny S 2017 Properties and performance of metakaolin pozzolanic cement pastes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 129: 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6087-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh N B and Middendorf B 2020 Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview. Constr. Build. Mater. 237: 117455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Turner L K and Collins F G 2013 Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 43: 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ameri F, Shoaei P, Reza Musaeei H, AlirezaZareei S and Cheah C B 2020 Partial replacement of copper slag with treated crumb rubber aggregates in alkali-activated slag mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 256: 119468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jha A K and Sivapullaiah P V 2020 Lime stabilization of soil: a physico-chemical and micro-mechanistic perspective. Indian Geotech. J. 50: 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-019-00371-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parthiban D, Vijayan D S, Koda E, Vaverkova M D, Piechowicz K, Osinski P and Du B V 2022 Role of industrial based precursors in the stabilization of weak soils with geopolymer—A review. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 16: e00886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pourakbar S, Huat B B K, Asadi A and Fasihnikoutalab M H 2016 Model study of alkali-activated waste binder for soil stabilization. Int. J. Geosynth. Gr. Eng. 2: 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0075-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdeldjouad L, Asadi A, Ball R J, Nahazanan H and Huat B B K 2019 Application of alkali-activated palm oil fuel ash reinforced with glass fibers in soil stabilization. Soils Found 59: 1552–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Adeyanju E, Okeke C A, Akinwumi I and Busari A 2020 Subgrade stabilization using rice husk ash-based geopolymer (GRHA) and cement kiln dust (CKD). Case Stud Constr Mater 13: e00388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baldovino JJA, Izzo RLS, Rose JL, Domingos MDI 2021Strength, durability, and microstructure of geopolymers based on recycled-glass powder waste and dolomitic lime for soil stabilization. Constr. Build. Mater. 271:121874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121874

  17. Sabitha D, Dattatreya J K, Sakthivel N and Bhuvaneshwari M 2020 Assessment of reactivity of energy efficient high volume fly ash based geopolymers through various approaches. Sādhanā 45: 178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01417-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Badkul A, Paswan R, Singh S K and Tegar J P 2021 A comprehensive study on the performance of alkali activated fly ash/GGBFS geopolymer concrete pavement. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2021.1926311

  19. Lv Q, Yu J, Ji F, Gu L, Chen Y and Shan X 2021 Mechanical property and microstructure of fly ash-based geopolymer activated by sodium silicate. KSCE J Civ Eng. 25: 1765–1777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0025-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tesanasin T, Suksiripattanapong C, Van Duc B, Tabyang W, Phetchuay C, Phoo-ngernkham T, Sukontasukkul P and Chindaprasirt P 2022 Engineering properties of marginal lateritic soil stabilized with one-part high calcium fly ash geopolymer as pavement materials. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 17: e01328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01328b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kockal N U, Beycan O and Gulmez N 2018 Effect of binder type and content on physical and mechanical properties of geopolymers. Sādhanā 43: 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0806-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cihangir F, Ercikdi B, Kesimal A, Turan A and Deveci H 2012 Utilisation of alkali-activated blast furnace slag in paste backfill of high-sulphide mill tailings: Effect of binder type and dosage. Miner. Eng. 30: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2012.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar A, Saravanan T J, Bisht K and Kabeer K I S A 2021 A review on the utilization of red mud for the production of geopolymer and alkali activated concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 302: 124170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lashkari S, Yazdipanah F, Shahri M and Sarker P 2021 Mechanical and durability assessment of cement-based and alkali-activated coating mortars in an aggressive marine environment. SN Appl Sci. 3: 618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04602-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tajaddini A, Saberian M, KamalzadehSirchi V, Li J and Maqsood T 2022 Improvement of mechanical strength of low-plasticity clay soil using geopolymer-based materials synthesized from glass powder and copper slag. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 18: e01820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Disfani M, Mohammadinia A, Arulrajah A, Horpibulsuk S and Leong M 2021 Lightly stabilized loose sands with alkali-activated fly ash in deep mixing applications. Int. J. Geomech. 21: 3. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shariati M, Shariati A, Trung N T, Shoaei P, Ameri F, Bahrami N and Zamanabadi S N 2021 Alkali-activated slag (AAS) paste: Correlation between durability and microstructural characteristics. Constr. Build. Mater. 267: 120886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Odeh N A and Al-Rkaby A H J 2022 Strength, durability, and microstructures characterization of sustainable geopolymer improved clayey soil. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 16: e00988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vediyappan S, Chinnaraj P K, Hanumantraya B B and Subramanian S K 2021 An experimental investigation on geopolymer concrete utilising micronized biomass silica and GGBS. KSCE J. Civ Eng. 25: 2134–2142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-1477-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sargent P, Hughes P N, Rouainia M and White M L 2012 The use of alkali activated waste binders in enhancing the mechanical properties and durability of soft alluvial soils. Eng. Geol. 152: 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Min Y, Wu J, Li B, Zhang M and Zhang J 2022 Experimental study of freeze–thaw resistance of a one-part geopolymer paste. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 17: e01269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. BhavitaChowdary V, Ramanamurty V and Pillai R J 2021 Experimental evaluation of strength and durability characteristics of geopolymer stabilised soft soil for deep mixing applications. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6: 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00407-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahmed A and Issa U H 2014 Stability of soft clay soil stabilised with recycled gypsum in a wet environment. Soils Found. 54: 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mohammadinia A, Disfani M, Conomy D and Arulrajah A 2019 Utilization of alkali-activated fly ash for construction of deep mixed columns in loose sands. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002878

  35. Amulya S, Ravi Shankar A U and Praveen M 2020 Stabilisation of lithomargic clay using alkali activated fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 21: 1114–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1521520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanjitsuwan S, Phoo-ngernkham T, Li L, Damrongwiriyanupap N and Chindaprasirt P 2018 Strength development and durability of alkali-activated fly ash mortar with calcium carbide residue as additive. Constr. Build. Mater. 162: 714–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liang G, Zhu H, Zhang Z, Wu Q and Du J 2019 Investigation of the waterproof property of alkali-activated metakaolin geopolymer added with rice husk ash. J. Clean Prod. 230: 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tekin I 2016 Properties of NaOH activated geopolymer with marble, travertine and volcanic tuff wastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 127: 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Song D, Huang T, Fang Q, Liu A, Gu Y-F, Liu Y-Q, Liu L-F and Zhang S-W 2021 Feasibility exploration on the geopolymerization activation of volcanic tuff, parametrical optimization, and reaction mechanisms. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 11: 618–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Özen S and Uzal B 2021 Effect of characteristics of natural zeolites on their geopolymerization. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 15: e00715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kitsopoulos K P and Dunham A C 1996 Heulandite and mordenite-rich tuffs from Greece: a potential source for pozzolanic materials. Miner. Depos. 31: 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rajabi A M and Ardakani S B 2020 Effects of natural-zeolite additive on mechanical and physicochemical properties of clayey soils. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32: 04020306. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pham V T, Meng P, Bui P T, Ogawa Y and Kawai K 2020 Effects of Shirasu natural pozzolan and limestone powder on the strength and aggressive chemical resistance of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 239:117679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117679

  44. Yilmaz F, Kamiloğlu H A and Şadoğlu E 2015 Soil stabilization with using waste materials against freezing thawing effect. Acta Phys. Pol. A. 128:B-392-B-395. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-392

  45. Sajan P, Jiang T, Lau C, Tan G and Ng K 2021 Combined effect of curing temperature, curing period and alkaline concentration on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer. Clean Mater. 1:100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2021.100002

  46. Samantasinghar S and Singh S P 2018 Effect of synthesis parameters on compressive strength of fly ash-slag blended geopolymer. Constr. Build. Mater. 170: 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Santhikala R, Chandramouli K and Pannirselvam N 2022 Stabilization of expansive soil using flyash based geopolymer. Mater. Today Proc. 68: 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kanta N R, Ponnada M R and Mishra K 2022 Application of response surface method for optimization of alkali activated slag concrete mix with used foundry sand as partial replacement of sand. Sādhanā 47: 269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-02040-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Coudert E, Paris M, Deneele D, Russo G and Tarantino A 2019 Use of alkali activated high-calcium fly ash binder for kaolin clay soil stabilisation: Physicochemical evolution. Constr. Build. Mater. 201: 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Phetchuay C, Horpibulsuk S, Arulrajah A, Suksiripattanapong C and Udomchai A 2016 Strength development in soft marine clay stabilized by fly ash and calcium carbide residue based geopolymer. Appl. Clay. Sci. 127–128: 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yaghoubi M, Arulrajah A, Disfani M M, Horpibulsuk S, Bo M W and Darmawan S 2018 Effects of industrial by-product based geopolymers on the strength development of a soft soil. Soils Found. 58: 716–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen R, Zhu Y, Lai H and Bao W 2020 Stabilization of soft soil using low-carbon lkali-activated binder. Environ. Earth. Sci. 79: 510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09259-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ahmed A and Ugai K 2011 Environmental effects on durability of soil stabilized with recycled gypsum. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 66: 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Oti J E, Kinuthia J M and Bai J 2009 Engineering properties of unfired clay masonry bricks. Eng Geol. 107: 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Okeke C, Abbey S, Oti J, Eyo E, Johnson A, Ngambi S, Abam T and Ujile M 2020 Appropriate use of lime in the study of the physicochemical behaviour of stabilised lateritic soil under continuous water ingress. Sustainability 13: 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Cristelo N, Glendinning S, Fernandes L and Pinto A T 2013 Effects of alkaline-activated fly ash and Portland cement on soft soil stabilisation. Acta Geotech. 8: 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-012-0200-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Fakhrabadi A, Ghadakpour M, Choobbasti A J and Kutanaei S S 2021 Evaluating the durability, microstructure and mechanical properties of a clayey-sandy soil stabilized with copper slag-based geopolymer against wetting-drying cycles. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 80: 5031–5051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02228-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported under Bayburt University Coordinatorship of Scientific Research Projects (Project No.: 2020/69002-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bayburt University, 69010, Bayburt, Turkey

    Fatih Yilmaz & Hakan Alper Kamiloğlu

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yalova University, 77000, Yalova, Turkey

    Ahmet Kuvat

Authors
  1. Fatih Yilmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmet Kuvat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hakan Alper Kamiloğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Alper Kamiloğlu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yilmaz, F., Kuvat, A. & Kamiloğlu, H.A. Optimizing and investigating durability performance of sandy soils stabilized with alkali activated waste tuff-fly ash mixtures. Sādhanā 48, 185 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02250-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02250-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation