Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of multiple crack propagation pattern in concrete using Voronoi tessellation method

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the multiple crack propagation is examined using a machine learning algorithm developed based on Voronoi tessellation method. In this way, a novel classification and geometrical dimensions-properties estimation approach, and a future-behavior-prediction method are proposed for all multiple crack formations on concrete surfaces. The crack properties, such as width, depth, length, volume, formation, etc., are measured using digital images for multiple crack formations. Then, the cracks are divided into parts to evaluate the capability of estimating the crack pattern by the use of methodology proposed in this study. Real crack formations in a construction site are observed and used in the experimental studies. The results of the experiments show that the technique developed is precise and effective for estimating multiple crack propagation on concrete surfaces. The details of the methodology developed, the crack formations observed and the estimation results obtained are presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mohan A and Poobal S 2018 Crack detection using image processing: A critical review and analysis. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 57: 787–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koch C, Georgieva K, Kasireddy V, Akinci B and Fieguth P 2015 A review on computer vision based defect detection and condition assessment of concrete and asphalt civil infrastructure. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 29: 196–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilir T, Gencel O and Topçu İB 2016 Prediction of restrained shrinkage crack widths of slag mortar composites by Takagi and Sugeno ANFIS models. Neural Computing and Applications. 27(8): 2523–2536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cefis N and Comi C 2017 Chemo-mechanical modelling of the external sulfate attack in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 93: 57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook A C, Vel S S and Johnson S E 2018 Pervasive cracking of heterogeneous brittle materials using a multi-directional smeared crack band model. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 149: 459–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abu-Mahfouz I and Banerjee A 2017 Crack detection and identification using vibration signals and fuzzy clustering. Procedia Computer Science. 114: 266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou M, Liao J, An L, Deng W, Hassanein M F and Yu Z 2018 Analysis of stress-induced cracks in concrete and mortar under cyclic uniaxial compression. Construction and Building Materials. 187: 652–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammed T U, Hamada H and Yamaji T 2003 Alkali-silica reaction-induced strains over concrete surface and steel bars in concrete. ACI Materials Journal. 100(2): 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karakis S, Sefercik U G, Bilir T and Atalay C 2020 Precise monitoring of temporal topographic change detection via unmanned air vehicle. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration. 161(161): 151–156

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rabah M, Elhattab A and Fayad A 2013 Automatic concrete cracks detection and mapping of terrestrial laser scan data. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics. 2: 250–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Valença J, Puente I, Júlio E, González-Jorge H and Arias-Sánchez P 2017 Assessment of cracks on concrete bridges using image processing supported by laser scanning survey. Construction and Building Materials. 146: 668–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng X and Murray A T 2018 Allocation using a heterogeneous space Voronoi diagram. Journal of Geographical Systems. 20: 207–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang C, Liu H and Tang Y 2019 Quantitative evaluation of voronoi graph search algorithm in UAV path planning. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Sciences, ICSESS. 8663950: 563–567

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bayar G and Bilir T 2019 A novel study for the estimation of crack propagation in concrete using machine learning algorithms. Construction and Building Materials. 215: 670–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li X, Krishnamurthy A, Hanniel I and Vachhani L 2019 Edge topology construction of Voronoi diagrams of spheres in non-general position. Computers & Graphics. 82: 332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heath D and Kasif S 1993 The complexity of finding minimal Voronoi covers with applications to machine learning. Computational Geometry. 3: 289–305

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Blakemore D M, Govender I, McBride A T and Mainza A N 2019 Multiple particle tracking in PEPT using Voronoi tessellations. Chemical Engineering Science. 207: 780–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen M T, Maniu C S and Olaru S 2017 Optimization-based control for Multi-Agent deployment via dynamic Voronoi partition. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 50: 1828–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gordon J S, Clements R A, Schoenberg F P and Schorlemmer D 2015 Voronoi residuals and other residual analyses applied to CSEP earthquake forecasts. Spatial Statics 14: 133–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kastrisios C and Tsoulos L 2018 Voronoi tessellation on the ellipsoidal earth for vector data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 32(8): 1541–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Preparata F P and Shamos M I 1985 Computational Geometry, an Introduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, incivez, 67100, Zonguldak, Turkey

    Gokhan Bayar

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Avcilar Campus, 34320, Avcilar, Istanbul, Turkey

    Turhan Bilir

Authors
  1. Gokhan Bayar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Turhan Bilir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gokhan Bayar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayar, G., Bilir, T. Estimation of multiple crack propagation pattern in concrete using Voronoi tessellation method. Sādhanā 48, 165 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02223-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02223-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation