Skip to main content
Log in

Shear flow stability: the physics of spatial development and viscosity stratification

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe how a nonparallel shear flow presents completely new physics in its stability behaviour, totally absent in a very close parallel shear flow. Roddam Narasimha’s insight in this context is discussed. The critical layer, where most of the disturbance kinetic energy is produced, plays an important role in this process. This critical layer also plays an important role in a viscosity-stratified flow. Boundary layers at low disturbance levels follow a more “traditional” route to turbulence whereas the process is very different in channels and pipes. In recent decades, strides have been made on understanding the latter, and we describe this. We also mention how viscosity stratification enters this process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Orr W M F 1907 The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Part I: a perfect liquid. Part II: a viscous liquid. Proc. R. Irish Acad. Sect. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 27: 9–68, 69–138

  2. Sommerfeld A 1908 Ein Beitrag zur hydrodynamischen Erklärung der turbulenten Flüssigkeitsbewegungenn. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education, vol 3, pp. 116–124

  3. Squire H B 1933 On the stability for three-dimensional disturbances of viscous fluid flow between parallel walls. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Charact. 142(847): 621–628

  4. Govindarajan R and Narasimha R 1995 Stability of spatially developing boundary layers in pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 300: 117–147

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Govindarajan R and Narasimha R 1997 A low-order theory for stability of non-parallel boundary layer flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 453(1967), 2537–2549

  6. Govindarajan R and Narasimha R 1999 Low-order parabolic theory for 2D boundary-layer stability. Phys. Fluids 11(6): 1449–1458

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin C C 1945 On the stability of two-dimensional parallel flows: Part I. General theory. Q. Appl. Math. 3(2): 117–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Narasimha R and Govindarajan R 2000 Minimal composite equations and the stability of non-parallel flows. Curr. Sci. 730–740

  9. Case K M 1960 Stability of inviscid plane Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 3(2): 143–148

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellingsen T and Palm E 1975 Stability of linear flow. Phys. Fluids 18(4): 487–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Landahl M T 1980 A note on an algebraic instability of inviscid parallel shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 98(2): 243–251

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Gustavsson L H 1991 Energy growth of three-dimensional disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 224: 241–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Butler K M and Farrell B F 1992 Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow. Phys. Fluids A 4(8): 1637–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Trefethen L N, Trefethen A E, Reddy S C and Driscoll T A 1993 Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues. Science 261(5121): 578–584

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Reddy S C, Schmid P J and Henningson D S 1993 Pseudospectra of the Orr–Sommerfeld operator. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 53(1): 15–47

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmid P J 2007 Nonmodal stability theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39: 129–162

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerswell R R 2018 Nonlinear nonmodal stability theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50: 319–345

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Thakur R, Sharma A and Govindarajan R 2021 Early evolution of optimal perturbations in a viscosity-stratified channel. J. Fluid Mech. 914

  19. Cherubini S, De Palma P, Robinet J-Ch and Bottaro A 2010 Rapid path to transition via nonlinear localized optimal perturbations in a boundary-layer flow. Phys. Rev. E 82(6): 066302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pringle C C T and Kerswell R R 2010 Using nonlinear transient growth to construct the minimal seed for shear flow turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(15): 154502

  21. Luchini P and Bottaro A 2014 Adjoint equations in stability analysis. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46: 493–517

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Skufca J D, Yorke J A and Eckhardt B 2006 Edge of chaos in a parallel shear flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(17): 174101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmiegel A and Eckhardt B 1997 Fractal stability border in plane Couette flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(26): 5250

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rama Govindarajan.

Additional information

Perspectives in some topics in fluid mechanics

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakur, R., Sharma, A. & Govindarajan, R. Shear flow stability: the physics of spatial development and viscosity stratification. Sādhanā 48, 163 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02208-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02208-x

Keywords

Navigation