Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental investigation of the use of LPG in a gasoline vehicle with a fuel stratified injection

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is intended to determine the applicability of LPG systems with hybrid LPG technology which could not be applied before in vehicles with layered combustion system. No previous academic studies have been found in the literature on hybrid LPG system. This technology exists in the sector, but an academic gap has been filled with this study. For this purpose, Volkswagen Touran 1.6 FSI brand vehicle, which had a four-stroke, four-cylinder, direct injection, split intake manifold, layered combustion system gasoline engine with AKL brand hybrid LPG system, was used on a dynamometer and vehicle wheel power and exhaust emission values were measured according to DIN 70020 at different gear ranges and speeds. When the power values were examined, it was determined that there was approximately 10.23% power loss in LPG mode compared to gasoline mode. When gasoline and LPG fuels are evaluated in terms of energy values in liter basis use; this may result from the fact that LPG gives 30% less energy than gasoline, and secondly LPG fuel occupies more space because it enters the combustion chamber in gaseous phase with the air in the engine intake manifold. When the exhaust emission values are analyzed, it is seen that 8.25% and 71.76% less harmful emissions occur for CO2 and CO values in LPG mode compared to gasoline mode. It was also seen that, in HC values, there was 27.15% less emission in 3rd, 4th and 5th gear levels in LPG mode compared to gasoline mode; and there was 14.28% more emission in 6th gear level. When the changes of the lambda (λ) values are examined, it is observed that it occurs at a more ideal rate in the 3rd and 4th gear stages in LPG mode compared to gasoline mode, in the 5th and 6th gear. As a result, it was observed that hybrid LPG system can be applied on gasoline engines with layered combustion system and although there is a loss of power in terms of vehicle performance, it was concluded that the use of LPG was advantageous compared to the use of gasoline fuel regarding exhaust emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

%:

Percent

λ:

Lambda

°C:

Celsius degree

AC:

Alternative current

AKL:

LPG and CNG equipment

cc:

Cubic centimeter

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

CO:

Carbon monoxide

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

DIN:

Deutsches Institut für normung

FSI:

Fuel stratified injection

HC:

Hydrocarbon

HP:

Horse power

Hz:

Hertz

inch:

Inch

km:

Kilometer

km/h:

Kilometer/hour

kW:

Kilowatt

LPG:

Liquefied petroleum gas

m:

Meter

MFB:

Mass fraction burn

mm:

Milimeter

MON:

Motor octane number

N:

Newton

Nm:

Newtonmeter

NOx:

Nitrogen oxides

PN:

Particle number

ppm:

Parts per million

RON:

Research octane number

Rpm:

Revolutions per minute

SI:

Spark ignition

V:

Volt

References

  1. Aliustaoğlu S and Ayhan V 2019 The effects of LPG-diesel dual fuel mixture on performance and smoke emissions in a direct injection diesel engine. J. Adv. Technol. Sci. 8(2): 110–116

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous 2018 LPG Consumer's Handbook, Energy Market Regulatory Board, Ankara/Turkey

  3. Usman M, Farooq M, Naqvi M, Saleem M W, Hussain J, Naqvi S R, Jahangir S, Usame H M J, Idrees S and Anukam A 2020 Use of gasoline, LPG and LPG-HHO blend in SI engine: a comparative performance for emission control and sustainable environment. Processes 8(74): 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Musthafa M M 2019 A comparative study on coated and uncoated diesel engine performance and emissions running on dual fuel (LPG-biodiesel) with and without additive. Ind. Crops Products 128: 194–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahn S, Cho J, Baek S, Kim K, Ko J, Myunh C L and Park S 2020 Comparative investigation of gaseous emissions and particle emission characteristics from turbo-charged direct injection (DI) engine with gasoline and LPG fuel depending on engine control parameters. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 21(2): 451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kırmaz İ 2019 Experimental Investigation of LPG in Gasoline Engines with New Generation Fuel System, MS Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science of Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya/Turkey, pp. 1–62

  7. Sayın C, Çanakçı M, Kılıçaslan İ and Özsezen N 2006 Double fuel (gasoline + liquefied petrolgas) ideal emission products of a gasoline engine Pamukkale University Engineering College. J. Eng. Sci. 12(2): 199–205

    Google Scholar 

  8. Küsell M, Moser W and Philipp M 1999 Motronic MED7 for Gasoline Direct Injection Engines: Engine Management System and Calibration Procedures, SAE Technical Papers, 1999-01-1284. pp 1804–1817

  9. Volkswagen A G W 2000 1.4 I 77 kW engine with petrol direct injection system in the lupo FSI design and function. Self-Study Program 252: 1–56

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pott E, Krebs R, Spiegel L, Hahn H and Zillmer M 2000 Emission control management of Volkswagen FSI fuel stratified injection engines. IFAC Proc 33(26): 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krebs R, Pott E, Kreuzer T P, Göbel U and Glück K H 2002 Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment of Volkswagen FSI Fuel Stratified Injection Engines. SAE Technical Papers, 2002-01-0346

  12. Volkswagen A G W 2002 Direct petrol injection system with bosch motronic MED 7 design and function. Self-Study Program 253: 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alexander J and Porpatham E 2019 Investigations on combustion characteristics of lean burn Si engine fuelled with ethanol and LPG. IOP conference series. Earth Environ Sci 265(1): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ansari A, Mustaffa N, Khalid A and Jaat N 2019 Evaluation of mixing characteristics of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) at different injector location. Fuel Mixture Form Combust Process 1: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gürbüz H, Şöhret Y and Akçay H 2019 Environmental and enviroeconomic assessment of an LPG fueled SI engine at partial load. J. Environ. Manage. 24: 631–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mustaffa N, Fawzi M, Osman S A and Tukiman M M 2019 Experimental analysis of liquid LPG injection on the combustion, performance and emissions in a spark ignition engine. IOP Confer. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 469(1): 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  17. AKL 2020 Elit-DI Sequential System LPG Kit Installation Manuel, AKL LPG&CNG Equipments, Konya/ Turkey, pp. 1–20

  18. Corghi 2020 Corghi BT90 PRO Auto Test Dynamometer, https://www.corghi.com/default.php?t=ecomm&eid=BT90&vimgd=/lista/BT90pro_p.png&el1=70&el2=73/default.php?t=site&lang=EN, Date of visit: 05.08.2020

  19. Bilsa 2019 Bilsa Mod 2210 Exhaust Emission Device, https://www.bilsaltd.com/egzozemisyon-cihazlar, (Date of visit: 05.08.2020)

  20. Örs İ 2007 Effect of Gasoline-Ethanol Blends on Vehicle Performance and Exhaust Emissions, MS Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science of Selcuk University, Konya/Turkey, pp. 1–63

  21. Holman J P 2012 Experimental methods for engineers. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineerring, New York, pp. 1–184

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kul B S and Ciniviz M 2021 An evaluation based on energy and exergy analyses in SI engine fueled with waste bread bioethanol-gasoline blends. Fuel 286: 119375

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is prepared as a part of Sena Nur KATIRCI’s MS Thesis (Advisor: Dr. Fatih AYDIN). This work was supported by the Scientific Research Council (BAP) of Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Aydin.

Appendix

Appendix

Below is a sample calculation for engine power using gasoline fuel for 4th gear 100 km/h.

$$ P_{w} = \frac{{F_{w*V} }}{3600}\left( {kW} \right) $$
(14)

Speed, V=100 km/h ± 5

Engine power, P=59 HP=59/1.36 = 43.3823529412 kW

Force, Fw=1561.764706 N ± 0.1

$$ \frac{{\partial {\text{P}}}}{{\partial {\text{F}}}} = \frac{{\text{V}}}{3600} = \frac{100}{{3600}} = 0.0277777778 $$
(15)
$$ \frac{{\partial {\text{P}}}}{{\partial {\text{V}}}} = \frac{{F_{w} }}{3600} = \frac{1561,764706}{{3600}} = 0.433823529 $$
(16)
$$ W_{P} = \sqrt {\left[ {\left( {0,0277777778} \right)^{2} *\left( 5 \right)^{2} + \left( {0,433823529} \right)^{2} *\left( {0,1} \right)^{2} } \right]} $$
(17)
$$ W_{p} = 0,145506536 $$
$$ \% W_{p} = \frac{{W_{p} }}{P}*100 = \frac{0,145506536}{{43,3823529412}}*100 = \% 0.335404896 $$
(18)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydin, F., Katirci, S.N. Experimental investigation of the use of LPG in a gasoline vehicle with a fuel stratified injection. Sādhanā 47, 32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01801-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01801-2

Keywords

Navigation