Skip to main content
Log in

Investigative design of missile longitudinal dynamics using LQR-LQG controller in presence of measurement noise and inaccurate model

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents the design and development of a Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controller for a longitudinal dynamics of a high maneuvering missile. The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) in association with Linear Quadratic Estimator (LQE) is realized through extensive numerical simulations to address the plant dynamics associated with measurement noise and inaccurate plant model. The LQR gives the minimum cost function to the proposed optimal solution for a missile control design application. The LQR and LQE design has been tested for its robustness subjecting it to parametric variation of disturbances and plant uncertainties. The study brings out the efficacy of the LQG controller over traditional methods in missile control system design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

X, Y, Z:

Forces in x, y and z directions

m:

Mass of the missile

\(\phi \) :

Roll angle

\(\alpha \) :

Angle of attack

\(\hbox {I}_{\mathrm{xx}}\), \(\hbox {I}_{\mathrm{yy}}\), \(\hbox {I}_{\mathrm{zz}}\) :

Moment of inertia about x, y and z axes

uvw :

Components of missile velocity three axes

pqr :

Roll rate, Pitch rate and Yaw rate

\(\theta \) :

Pitch angle

\(\delta _{pitch}\) :

Pitch control deflection

L, M, N:

Rolling moment, Pitch moment, Yawing moment

x(t):

State vector

u(t):

Control input vector

A, B, C, D:

Plant matrix, input matrix, output matrix and feed-forward matrix

\(C_{AT}\) :

Axial force coefficient

\(C_{N}\) :

Normal force coefficient

IMU:

Inertial Measurement Unit

References

  1. John Doyle 1978 Guaranteed margins for LQG regulators. IEEE Transactions on automatic Control. 23(4): 756–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Michael Athans 1986 A Tutorial on the LQG/LTR Method. Proc. IEEE Am. Control Conf., 1289–1296, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.1986.4789131

  3. Neculai Andrei 2006 Modern control theory. Studies in Informatics and Control. 15(1): 51

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Saptarshi Das and Kaushik Halder 2014 Missile attitude control via a hybrid LQG-LTR-LQI control scheme with optimum weight selection, Proc. of First IEEE International Conference on Automation, Control, Energy and Systems (ACES), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACES.2014.6807996

  5. Mohsen Ahmed Wael and Quan Quan 2011 Robust hybrid control for ballistic missile longitudinal autopilot. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 24(6): 777–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jianqiao YU, Guanchen LUO and Yuesong MEI 2011 Surface-to-air missile autopilot design using LQG/LTR gain scheduling method. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 24(3): 279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aliyu Bhar Kisabo, Aliyu Funmilayo Adebimpe and Sholiyi Olusegun Samue 2019 Pitch Control of a Rocket with a Novel LQG/LTR Control Algorithm. J. Aircraft Spacecraft Technol., 3(1): 24–37, https://doi.org/10.3844/jastsp.2019.24.37

  8. Javad Tayebi, Amir Ali Nikkhah and Jafar Roshanian 2017 LQR/LQG attitude stabilization of an agile microsatellite with CMG. Aircraft Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 89(2): 290–296, https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-07-2014-0102

  9. Balázs Kulcsár 2000 LQG/LTR controller design for an aircraft model. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 28(1-2): 131–142

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ki-jun Seong, Ho-gyun Kang, Bo-yeon Yeo and Ho-pyeong Lee 2006 The Stabilization Loop Design for a Two-Axis Gimbal System Using LQG/LTR Controller, Proc. of SICE-ICASE IEEE International Joint Conference, 755–759, https://doi.org/10.1109/SICE.2006.315268

  11. Brown J M, Ridgely D B and Paschall R N 1994 Autopilot design for a tail-controlled missile using LQG/LTR with eigenstructure reassignment, Proc. of IEEE American Control Conference - ACC 94, 3: 3278–3282, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.1994.735181

  12. Christopher L Sheperd and Lena Valavani 1988 Autopilot Design for Bank-to-Turn Missiles using LQG/LTR Methodology, Proc. of IEEE American Control Conference, 579–586, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.1988.4789786

  13. Karen E Willcox, Douglas Allaire, George Biros, Jeffrey Chambers, Omar Ghattas and David Kordonowy 2012 Dynamic Data Driven Methods for Self-aware Aerospace Vehicles, Procedia Comput. Sci., 9: 1206–1210, ISSN 1877-0509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.04.130

  14. Fatima Shoaib, Arsalan Khawaja M, Hafiz Zeeshan Iqbal Khan, Farooq Haydar M and Jamshed Riaz 2019 Optimal and Robust Solutions for Longitudinal Flight Control of a Canard-Configured High Performance Aircraft. Proc. of 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology, IBCAST 2019, 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1109/IBCAST.2019.8667212

  15. Fangjian Wang and Lan Chen 2015 Numerical prediction of stability derivatives for complex configurations. Procedia Engineering, 99: 1561–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chi Xu, Yu Jin, Xin Wang and Duli Yu 2019 A design of LQG controller for high performance MEMS accelerometer, Proc. of IEEE Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), pp. 6242–6247, https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2019.8832389

  17. Tahiyatul Asfihani, Didik Khusnul Arif, Subchan, Firdaus Priyatno Putra and Moch Ardi Firmansyah May 2019 Comparison of LQG and Adaptive PID Controller for USV Heading Control. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1218(1). IOP Publishing

  18. Munadi Muna, Mochammad Ariyanto, Joga Dharma Setiawan, Amir Abdullah M, Ahmad Hasan Fauzi and Muhammad Nanda Setiawan October 2018 L1 Adaptive Control for Missile Longitudinal Dynamic using MATLAB/Simulink. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. (IJMET) 9(10): 1346–1355, ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359

  19. Labane Chrifa and Zemalache Meguenni Kadda 2014 Aircraft control system using LQG and LQR controller with optimal estimation-kalman filter design. Procedia Engineering. 80(2): 245-257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brian D O Anderson and John B Moore 1971 Linear Optimal Control, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Ashish Tiwary Feb 2002 Modern Control Design: With MATLAB and SIMULINK, 1st ed., Publisher Wiley, ISBN-13:978-0471496793

  22. Donald E Kirk 1988 Optimal Control Theory-An Introduction, Dover Publications Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kalman R E 1959 On the general theory of control systems, IRE Trans. Autom. Control, 4(3): 110, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1959.1104873

  24. Kalman R E 1960 A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. ASME. J. Basic Eng. 82(1): 35–45, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552

  25. Arikapalli VSN Murthy, Bhowmick Shiladitya, Bhogendra Rao PVRR, Ramakalyan Ayyagari Sep 2021 Missile Longitudinal Dynamics Control Design using Pole Placement and LQR Methods - A Critical Analysis. Def. Sci. J.. 71(5): 699–708, https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.71.16232

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P V R R Bhogendra Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arikapalli, V.S.N.M., Bhowmick, S., Rao, P.V.R.R.B. et al. Investigative design of missile longitudinal dynamics using LQR-LQG controller in presence of measurement noise and inaccurate model. Sādhanā 47, 38 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01784-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01784-0

Keywords

Navigation