Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance evaluation of novel surface flame self-aspirated porous radiant burners for cooking applications

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Porous radiant burners (PRBs) are based on the principle of porous media combustion (PMC) in which both combustion and stabilization of the flame take place towards the end of combustion zone (CZ). It has lot of advantages over conventional free flame burners. The porous matrix has high thermal conductivity and high emissivity. Hence, contributions to conduction, convection and radiation in the PMC are significant. This paper presents experimental results on the thermal and emission performance of newly developed, bi-layered, self-aspirated porous radiant surface flame burners used in cooking applications. It comprises firebrick material in the CZ and steel balls in the preheating zone (PZ). Performance of this burner is compared to that of a conventional cooking burner (CB) within the operating range of 0.5–2 kW. The effect of burner geometry (one is circular and the other one is square in cross section) on the thermal performance and emission using liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) as the fuel is also studied and their thermal performances are compared to the conventional ones. The experimental results have revealed that the thermal efficiencies of circular and square PRBs are much higher than those of the conventional burner. The maximum thermal efficiency of the self-aspirated circular porous radiant burner (SCPRB) is found to be 71.78% at the flow rate (V) of 2.0 m/s with a porosity of 85%, whereas the thermal efficiency obtained from self-aspirated square porous radiant burner (SSPRB) is marginally less than that of SCPRB at the corresponding flow rate and porosity. The emission levels are much lower in these novel PRBs as compared with the conventional burner and these values are well below the World Health Organization (WHO) standard. The NOx emission values corresponding to the optimum velocity of 2.0 m/s are 87 ppm for CB, and 24 and 27 ppm, respectively, for SCPRB and SSPRB. CO emission values are 32, 33 and 155 ppm for SCPRB, SSPRB and CB, respectively, corresponding to the optimum velocity of flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CO:

carbon monoxide

CO2 :

carbon dioxide

CV:

calorific value of the fuel

C pw :

specific heat of water

C pv :

specific heat of vessel

HC:

hydrocarbon

lpm:

litres per minute

m w :

mass of water

m v :

mass of the vessel

NOx :

nitrogen oxides

O2 :

free oxygen

t 2 :

final temperature of water

t 1 :

initial temperature of water

α:

proportional

References

  1. Pantangi V K, Mishra S C, Muthukumar P and Reddy R 2011 Studies on porous radiant burners for LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) cooking applications. Energy 36: 6074–6080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Muthukumar P and Shyamkumar P I 2013 Development of novel porous radiant burners for LPG cooking applications. Fuel 112: 562–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Muthukumar P 2011 Performance analysis of porous radiant burners used in LPG cooking stove. Int. J. Energy Environ. 2: 367–374

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mishra N K, Muthukumar P and Mishra S C 2013 Performance tests on medium-scale porous radiant burners for LPG cooking applications. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 3: 126–130

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jugjai S, Tia S and Trewetasksorn W 2001 Thermal efficiency improvement of an LPG gas cooker by a swirling central flame. Int. J. Energy Res. 25: 657–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Namkhat A and Jugjai S 2010 Primary air entrainment characteristics for a self-aspirating burner: model and experiments. Energy 35: 1701–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jugjai S and Rungsimuntuchart N 2002 High efficiency heat-recirculating domestic gas burners. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 26: 581–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoksenakul W and Jugjai S 2011 Improvement of thermal efficiency of heat-recirculating gas burner. D. Eng. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology, Thonburi (KMUTT)

  9. Kline S J and Mc Flintlock F A 1953 Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech. Eng. 75(1): 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holman J P 2001 Experimental methods for engineers, 7th ed. Boston, USA: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu F J and Hsieh W H 2004 Experimental investigation of combustion in porous heating burners. Combust. Flame 138: 295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leonardi A S, Viskanta R and Gore P J 2002 Radiation and thermal performance measurements of a metal fiber burner. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 73: 491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho S W, Kim Y S, Jeon C H and Chang Y J 2010 An experimental study on the performance optimization of a radiant burner with a surface flame structure. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 24: 923–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Catapan R C, Oliveira A A M and Costa M 2011 Non-uniform velocity profile mechanism for flame stabilization in a porous radiant burner. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 35: 172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu C Y, Chen K H and Yang S Y 2014 Experimental study of porous metal burners for domestic stove applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 77: 380–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sathe S B, Peck R E and Tong T W A 1990 Numerical analysis of heat transfer and combustion in porous radiant burners. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 33: 1331–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barra A J, Diepvens G, Ellzey J L and Henneke M R 2003 Numerical study of the effects of material properties on flame stabilization in a porous burner. Combust. Flame 134: 369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mishra N K, Mishra S C and Muthukumar P 2015 Performance characterization of a medium-scale liquefied petroleum gas cooking stove with a two-layer porous radiant burner. Appl. Therm. Eng. 89: 44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mishra N K, Muthukumar P and Mishra S C 2013 Performance tests on medium-scale porous radiant burners for LPG cooking applications. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 3: 126–130

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ashman P J, Junus R, Stubington J F and Sergeamt G D 1994 The effects of load height on the emissions from a natural gas-fired domestic cooktop burner. Combust. Sci. Technol. 103: 283–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hou S S and Ko Y C 2004 Effects of heating height on flame appearance, temperature field and efficiency of an impinging laminar jet flame used in domestic gas stoves. Energy Convers. Manag. 45: 9–10, 1583–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Catapan R C, Oliveira A A M and Costa M 2011 Non-uniform velocity profile mechanism for flame stabilization in a porous radiant burner. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 35: 172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Francisco Jr. R W, Rua F, Costa M, Catapan R C and Oliveira A A M 2009 On the combustion of hydrogen-rich gaseous fuels with low calorific value in a porous burner. Energy Fuels 24: 880–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Francisco Jr. R W, Costa M R, Catapan C and Oliveira A A M 2013 Combustion of hydrogen rich gaseous fuels with low calorific value in a porous burner placed in a confined heated environment. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 45: 102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Purna Chandra Mishra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pradhan, P., Mishra, P.C. Performance evaluation of novel surface flame self-aspirated porous radiant burners for cooking applications. Sādhanā 43, 173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0934-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0934-7

Keywords

Navigation