Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the role of ICT intervention in grassroots innovation using structural equation modelling approach

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on information communication technologies (ICT) for entrepreneurship development is burgeoning, yet our understanding of the use of ICT in support of grassroots innovation remains unclear. This paper examines the moderating role of the use of ICT on the relationship between grassroots innovation (GRI) and entrepreneurial success (ES). The study involved 400 grassroots entrepreneurs selected from three states in India, and the moderating effect of the use of ICT was analysed using moderated structural equation modelling. The results revealed that the use of ICT partially moderates the relationship between the new learning practices and economic benefits. It also partially moderates the relationship between local solution and economic benefits, but it fully moderates the relationship between networking capabilities and economic benefits, where the relationship is stronger when the use of ICT is high. Furthermore, the study found that the use of ICT does not moderate the relationship between new learning practice and non-economic benefits, relationship between local solution and non-economic benefits and relationship between networking capabilities and non-economic benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Subba Rao S 2004 Role of ICTs in India’s rural community information systems. Info 6(4): 261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarafdar M, Anekal P and Singh R 2012 Market development at the bottom of the pyramid: examining the role of information and communication technologies. Inf. Technol. Dev. 18(4): 311–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maurya N, Kumar V, Patel R, Mahanta H and Gupta A 2014 ICTs in support of grassroots innovation. Inf. Technol. Inter. Dev. 10(1): 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta A K 2013 Tapping the Entrepreneurial Potential of Grassroots Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Special Supplement on Innovation for a Complex World. Summer. 11(3): 18–20

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta A K 2006 From sink to source: the Honey Bee Network documents indigenous knowledge and innovations in India. Innovations 1(3): 49–66

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Joshi R G, Chelliah J and Ramanathan V 2015 Exploring grassroots innovation phenomenon through the lived experience of an Indian grassroots innovator. South Asian J. Global Bus. Res. 4 (1): 27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Keersmaecker A, Parmar V, Kandachar P, Baelus C and Vandenbempt K 2012 Towards Scaling Up Grassroots Innovations in India: a Preliminary Framework. In: UNESCO Chair International Conference Technologies for Sustainable Development: A Way to Reduce Poverty? EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 29–31

  8. Gupta A K 2012 Innovations for the poor by the poor. Int. J. Technol. Learn. Innov. Dev. 5(1/2): 28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pathak R 2008 Grass-root creativity, innovation, entrepreneurialism and poverty reduction. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag. 8(1): 87–98

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Cecchini S and Scott C 2003 Can information and communications technology applications contribute to poverty reduction? Lessons from rural India. Inf. Technol. Dev. 10(2): 73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chowdhury S K 2006 Investments in ICT-capital and economic performance of small and medium scale enterprises in East Africa. J. Int. Dev. 18(4): 533–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Corea S 2007 Promoting development through information technology innovation: The IT artifact, artfulness, and articulation. Inf. Technol. Dev. 13(1): 49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta A, Kothari B and Patel K 2000 Networking knowledge-rich, economically poor people. Information and communication technology in rural development: case studies from India. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute, pp. 84–97

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seyfang G and Smith A 2007 Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ. Politics 16(4): 584–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hossain M 2016 Grassroots innovation: a systematic review of two decades of research. J. Clean. Prod. 137: 973–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhaduri S and Kumar H 2011 Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: tracing the motivation of ‘grassroot’ innovators in India. Mind & Soc. 10(1): 27–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith A, Fressoli M and Thomas H 2014 Grassroots innovation movements: challenges and contributions. J. Clean. Prod. 63: 114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar V, Chand V S, Zhang L, Odora Hoppers C A, Zhang W, Esders M and Hupta A K 2013 Grassroots Innovations for Inclusive Development: need for a Paradigmatic Shift. Vikalpa. 38(3): 103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pathak R 2008 Grass-root creativity, innovation, entrepreneurialism and poverty reduction. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag. 8(1): 87–98

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin C J, Upham P and Budd L 2015 Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: insights from the sharing economy. Ecol. Econ. 118: 240–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rahemtulla H A, Haklay M and Longley P A 2008 A mobile spatial messaging service for a grassroots environmental network. J. Locat Based Serv. 2(2): 122-152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baliamoune-Lutz M 2003 Analysis of the Determinants and Effects of ICT Diffusion in Developing Countries. Inf. Technol. Dev. 10(3): 151–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghosh M and Ghosh I 2009 ICT and information strategies for a knowledge economy: the Indian experience. Program. 43(2): 187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher R, Maritz A and Lobo A 2014 Evaluating entrepreneurs’ perception of success: development of a measurement scale. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 20(5): 478–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bonet F P, Armengot C R and Martin M A G 2011 Entrepreneurial Success and Human Resources. Int. J. Manpower. 32(1): 68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shepherd D A and Patzelt H 2011 The New Field of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Studying Entrepreneurial Action Linking “What Is to Be Sustained” With “What Is to Be Developed”. Entrepr. Theory Pract. 35(1): 137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huggins R R and Izushi H 2002 The Digital Divide and ICT Learning in Rural Communities: Examples of Good Practice Service Delivery. Local Econ. 17(2): 111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kanungo A. 2004 On the emancipatory role of rural information systems. Inf. Technol. People. 17(4): 407–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pigg K E and Crank L D 2005 Do Information Communication Technologies Promote Rural Economic Development? Community Dev. 36(1): 65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Puri S K and Sahay S 2007 Role of ICTs in participatory development: an Indian experience. Inf. Technol. Devel. 13(2):133–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kopparapu S K and Saxena V 2014 Identifying the best market to sell: a cost function formulation. Sadhana 39(6): 1409–1423

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Carty V 2010 New information communication technologies and grassroots mobilization. Inf. Commun. Soc. 13(2): 155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Galloway L, Mochrie R and Deakins D 2004 ICT enabled collectivity as a positive rural business strategy. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 10(4): 247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Reinsberger K, Brudermann T, Hatzl S, Fleiß E and Posch A 2015 Photovoltaic diffusion from the bottom-up: analytical investigation of critical factors. Appl. Energy. 159: 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh S H and Bhowmick B 2016 Innovation Network for Entrepreneurship Development in Rural Indian Context: Exploratory Factor Analysis. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 13(4): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rauch A and Frese M 2000 Psychological approaches to entrepreneurial success. A general model and an overview of findings. In: Cooper C L and Robertson I T (Eds.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 101–142

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kuriyan R, Ray I and Toyama K 2008 Information and communication technologies for development: The bottom of the pyramid model in practice. Inf. Soc. 24(2): 93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cortina J M, Chen G and Dunlap W P 2002 Testing Interaction Effects in LISREL: Examination and Illustration of the Available Procedures. Organ. Res. Methods 4 (4): 324–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ping R A 1995 A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables. J. Market. Res. 32: 336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Conway J M and Huffcutt A I 2003 A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods. 6: 147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. King L J 1969 Statistical Analysis in Geography. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jin X H, Doloi H and Gao S Y 2007 Relationship-based determinants of building project performance in China. Constr. Manag. Econ. 25: 297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Conway E, Fu N, Alfes K and Bailey C 2016 Demands or resources? The Relationship between HR Practices, employee engagement, and emotional exhaustion within a hybrid model of employment relations. Human Resour. Manag. 55(5): 901–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shanmugapriya S and Subramanian K 2015 Structural equation model to investigate the factors influencing quality performance in Indian construction projects. Sadhana 40(6): 1975–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721 302, India

    SONAL SINGH & BHASKAR BHOWMICK

  2. Department of Marketing and Entrepreneurship, University of Nebraska, Omaha, 68182, USA

    BIRUD SINDHAV & DALE EESLEY

Authors
  1. SONAL SINGH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. BIRUD SINDHAV
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. DALE EESLEY
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. BHASKAR BHOWMICK
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SONAL SINGH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

SINGH, S., SINDHAV, B., EESLEY, D. et al. Investigating the role of ICT intervention in grassroots innovation using structural equation modelling approach. Sādhanā 43, 104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0909-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0909-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation