Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Can artificially intelligent agents really be conscious?

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mind and intelligence are closely related with the consciousness. Indeed, artificial intelligence (AI) is the most promising avenue towards artificial consciousness (AC). However, in literature, consciousness has been considered as the least amenable to being understood or replicated by AI. Further, computational theories of mind (CTMs) render the mind as a computational system and it is treated as a substantial hypothesis within the purview of AI. However, the consciousness, which is a phenomenon of mind, is partially tackled by this theory and it seems that the CTM is not corroborated considerably in this pursuit. Many valuable contributions have been incorporated by the researchers working strenuously in this domain. However, there is still scarcity of globally accepted computational models of consciousness that can be used to design conscious intelligent machines. The contributions of the researchers entail consciousness as a vague, incomplete and human-centred entity. In this paper, attempt has been made to analyse different theoretical and intricate issues pertaining to mind, intelligence and AC. Moreover, this paper discusses different computational models of the consciousness and critically analyses the possibility of generating the machine consciousness as well as identifying the characteristics of conscious machine. Further, different inquisitive questions, e.g., “Is it possible to devise, project and build a conscious machine?”, “Will artificially conscious machines be able to surpass the functioning of artificially intelligent machines?” and “Does consciousness reflect a peculiar way of information processing?” are analysed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shannon C E and Weaver W 1949 The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Haugeland J 1985 Artificial intelligence: the very idea. In: Mind design II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

  3. Russell S and Norvig P 2003 Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. New York: Prentice-Hall

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfeifer R 1999 Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sporns O 2011 Networks of the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Pfeifer R, Lungarella M et al 2007 Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science 5853: 1088–1093

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haugeland J 1985 Semantic engines: an introduction to mind design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Minsky M 1991 Conscious machines. In: Machinery of consciousness, National Research Council of Canada

  9. Turing A 1950 Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 49: 433–460

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagel T 1974 What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review 4: 435–450

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baars BJ 1988 A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCarthy J 1995 Making robots conscious of their mental state. In: Muggleton S (Ed.) Machine intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Edelman G M and Tonoi G 2000 A universe of consciousness: how matter becomes imagination. London: Allen Lane

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jennings C 2000 In search of consciousness. Nature Neuroscience 3(8): 1

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aleksander I 2001 The self ‘out there’. Nature 413: 23

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baars B J 2002 The conscious access hypothesis: origins and recent evidence. Trends in Cognitive Science 6(1): 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  17. Franklin S 2003 IDA: a conscious artifact? In: Holland O (Ed.) Machine consciousness. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuipers B 2005 Consciousness: drinking from the fire hose of experience. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-05

  19. Adamin C 2006 What do robots dreams of? Science 314(5802): 1093–1094

    Google Scholar 

  20. Minsky M 2006 The emotion machine: commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. New York: Simon & Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chella A and Manzotti R 2007 Artificial consciousness. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tononi G 2004 An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience 5: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tononi G 2008 Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto. Biological Bulletin 215: 216–242

    Google Scholar 

  24. Manzotti R and Tagliasco V 2005 From behaviour-based robots to motivation-based robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 51: 175–190

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holland O 2004 The future of embodied artificial intelligence: machine consciousness? In: Iida F (Ed.) Embodied artificial intelligence. Berlin: Springer, pp. 37–53

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shanahan M 2005 Global access, embodiment, and the conscious subject. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12: 46–66

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shanahan M 2010 Embodiment and the inner life: cognition and consciousness in the space of possible minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aleksander I, Awret U et al 2008 Assessing artificial consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15: 95–110

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chrisley R 2009 Synthetic phenomenology. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 1: 53–70

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ziemke T 2008 On the role of emotion in biological and robotic autonomy. BioSystems 91: 401–408

    Google Scholar 

  31. Carruthers P 2001 Précis of phenomenal consciousness, http://lgxserver.uniba.it/lei/mind/forums/002_0002.htm [accessed 1.5.08]

  32. Buttazzo G 2001 Artificial consciousness: utopia or real possibility? Spectrum IEEE Computer 34(7): 24–30

    Google Scholar 

  33. Holland O (Ed.) 2003 Machine consciousness. New York: Imprint Academic

    Google Scholar 

  34. Adami C 2006 What do robots dream of? Science 314(58): 1093–1094

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aleksander I 2008 Machine consciousness. Scholarpedia 3(2): 4162

    Google Scholar 

  36. Aleksander I, Awret U et al 2008 Assessing artificial consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15(7): 95–110

    Google Scholar 

  37. Buttazzo G 2008 Artificial consciousness: hazardous questions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Medicine (special issue on Artificial consciousness) 44(2): 139–146

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chrisley R 2008 The philosophical foundations of artificial consciousness. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Medicine (special issue on Artificial consciousness) 44(2): 119–137

    Google Scholar 

  39. Manzotti R and Tagliasco V 2008 Artificial consciousness: a discipline between technological and theoretical obstacles. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Medicine (special issue on Artificial consciousness) 44(2): 105–117

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chalmers D J 1996 The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. McGinn C 1989 Can we solve the mind–body problem? Mind 98: 349–366

    Google Scholar 

  42. Harnad S 2003 Can a machine be conscious? How? Journal of Consciousness Studies

  43. Kim J 1998 Mind in a physical world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hayes-Roth B 1985 A black board architecture for control. Artificial Intelligence 26(3): 251–321

    Google Scholar 

  45. Currie K and Tate A 1991 O-plan: the open planning architecture. Artificial Intelligence 52(1): 49–86

    Google Scholar 

  46. Koch C 2004 The quest for consciousness: a neurobiological approach. Englewood, CO: Roberts & Company Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  47. Moravec H 1988 Mind children: the future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kaku M 2014 The future of the mind: the scientific quest to understand, enhance, and empower the mind. New York, United States: Doubleday

    Google Scholar 

  49. Anderson M L and Oates T 2007 A review of recent research in meta-reasoning and meta-learning. AI Magazine 28(1): 7–16

    Google Scholar 

  50. Baars B J 1998 A Cognitive theory of consciousness. New York, United States: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  51. Blackmore S 2002 There is no stream of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9(5–6): 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chrisley R 2003 Embodied artificial intelligence [review]. Artificial Intelligence 149(1): 131–150

    Google Scholar 

  53. Clowes R, Torrance S and Chrisley R 2007 Machine consciousness—embodiment and imagination [editorial material]. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(7): 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  54. Densmore S and Dennett D 1999 The virtues of virtual machines. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59(3): 747–761

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gamez D 2008 Progress in machine consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 17(3): 887–910

    Google Scholar 

  56. Haikonen P O A 2007 Essential issues of conscious machines. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(7): 72–84

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rolls E T 2007 A computational neuroscience approach to consciousness [review]. Neural Networks 20(9): 962–982

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rosenthal D M 1991 The nature of mind. Canada: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sloman A and Chrisley R 2003 Virtual machines and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10(4–5): 133–172

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sun R 1997 Learning, action and consciousness: a hybrid approach toward modelling consciousness. Neural Networks 10(7): 1317–1331

    Google Scholar 

  61. Taylor J G 2007 CODAM: a neural network model of consciousness. Neural Networks 20(9): 983–992

    Google Scholar 

  62. Velmans M 2002 Making sense of causal interactions between consciousness and brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9(11): 69–95

    Google Scholar 

  63. Velmans M 2009 How to define consciousness: and how not to define consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16(5): 139–156

    Google Scholar 

  64. Chrisley R 1995 Non-conceptual content and robotics: taking embodiment seriously. In: Ford K, Glymour C and Hayes P (Eds.) Android epistemology. Cambridge: AAAI/MIT Press, pp. 141–166

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hirose N 2002 An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition. Cognitive Systems Research 3: 289–299

    Google Scholar 

  66. Shanahan M P 2005 Global access, embodiment, and the conscious subject. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12(12): 46–66

    Google Scholar 

  67. Pfeifer R, Lungarella M et al 2007 Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science 5853(318): 1088–1093

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sanz R 2005 Design and implementation of an artificial conscious machine. In: Proceedings of IWAC2005, Agrigento

  69. Rockwell T 2005 Neither ghost nor brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  70. Manzotti R 2007 From artificial intelligence to artificial consciousness. In: Chella A and Manzotti R (Eds.) Artificial consciousness. London: Imprint Academic

    Google Scholar 

  71. Arkin R C 1998 Behavior-based robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ebbinghaus H 1908 Abriss der psychologie. Leipzig: Von Veit

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nemes T 1962 Kibernetic gépek. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadò

    Google Scholar 

  74. Putnam H 1964 Robots: machines or artificially created life? The Journal of Philosophy 61(21): 668–691

    Google Scholar 

  75. Miller G 2005 What is the biological basis of consciousness? Science 309: 79

    Google Scholar 

  76. Seth A, Dienes Z et al 2008 Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(8): 314–321

    Google Scholar 

  77. Aleksander I and Dunmall B 2003 Axioms and tests for the presence of minimal consciousness in agents. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10: 7–18

    Google Scholar 

  78. Searle J 1980 Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 417–457

    Google Scholar 

  79. Koch C and Tononi G 2008 Can machines be conscious? IEEE Spectrum (June): 47–51

  80. Block N 1995 On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 18: 227–287

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tononi G 2004 An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience 5(42): 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  82. Liljenström H 2011 Intention and attention in consciousness dynamics and evolution. Journal of Cosmology 14

  83. Lycan W G 1981 Form, function, and feel. The Journal of Philosophy 78(1): 24–50

    Google Scholar 

  84. Moore G E 1965 Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8): 114–117

    Google Scholar 

  85. Moravec H 1999 Robot: mere machine to transcendent mind. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  86. Hofstadter D R and Dennett D C 1981 The mind’s I: fantasies and reflections on self and soul. New York: Basic books

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  87. Hofstadter D R 1979 Godel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. New York: Base Book

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Minsky M 1968 Matter, mind, and models. In: Minsky M (Ed.) Semantic information processing. Cambridge, United States: MIT Press, pp. 425–432

    Google Scholar 

  89. Minsky M 1986 The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  90. McCarthy J 2005 Making robots conscious of their mental states. In: Proceedings of the Machine Intelligence Workshop, retrieved December 31, 2005 from http://www.formal.stanford.edu/jmc/chinese.html

  91. McCarthy J 1995 Todd Moody’s zombies. Journal of Consciousness Studies, retrieved from http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/zombie/zombie.html

  92. Moody T C 1994 Conversations with zombies. Journal of Consciousness Studies (12): 196–200

    Google Scholar 

  93. Dennett D C 1969 Content and consciousness. In: International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method Series. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

  94. Perlis D 1997 Consciousness as self-function. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4(5–6): 509–625

    Google Scholar 

  95. Sloman A 1978 The computer revolution in philosophy. Hassocks, Sussex: The Harvester Press

    Google Scholar 

  96. Smith B C 1984 Reflection and semantics in LISP. In: Proceedings of POPL’84, 11th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, pp. 23–35

  97. Harnad S 1990 The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42: 335–346

    Google Scholar 

  98. Sloman A 2002 The irrelevance of Turing machines to artificial intelligence. In: Scheutz M (Ed.) Computationalism: new directions, pp. 87–127

  99. Said K A M, Newton-Smith W H, Viale R and Wilkes K 1990 Modelling the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–82

    Google Scholar 

  100. Allen W 1971 Getting even. United States: Random House Publisher, ISBN: 978-0394473482

    Google Scholar 

  101. Dasgupta S 1949 A history of Indian philosophy, 4 vols. Cambridge: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  102. Deussen P 1912 (a) The philosophy of the Upanishads. Translated by Geden A S and Clark T. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark (b) The system of the VedAnta. Translated by Johnston C. Chicago: Open Court

  103. Garbe R 1926 Vedanta. In: Hastings J (Ed.) Encyclopedia of religion and ethics. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 13 vols., vol. 2, p. 597

  104. Geden A S 1921 Upanisads. Hastings J (Ed.) Encyclopaedia of religion and ethics. Edinburgh, London: T. & T. Clark, vol. 12, pp. 540–548

    Google Scholar 

  105. Kenny D T 2016 A brief history of psychoanalysis: from Freud to fantasy to folly. Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia 4(1)

  106. Carus P 1891 The soul of man: an investigation of the facts of physiological and experimental psychology. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Hume R E 1931 The thirteen principal Upanishads, 2nd ed. rev. by Haas G C O. London: Oxford University Press

  108. Verse 42, Chapter 3, The Bhagwad-Gita.

  109. Safaya R 1975 Indian psychology: a critical and historical analysis of the psychological speculations in Indian philosophical literature. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  110. The Katha-Upanisad, 1.3.3-4

  111. Samkhya Pravasana Sutra, V. 129; iii. 2021

  112. Radhakrishnan S 2008 Indian philosophy, vol. 2 with an introduction by Mohanty J N, p. 281

  113. Misra S Upaskara Commentary of Vaisesika Sutra -III, 1,4

  114. Prakarana pancika, P-63

  115. Radhakrishnan S 2008 Indian philosophy, 2nd ed., vol. 2, p. 680 with an introduction by Mohanty J N

  116. Århem P and Liljenström H 2007 Beyond cognition – on consciousness transitions. In: Liljenström H and Århem P (Eds.) Consciousness transitions – phylogenetic, ontogenetic and physiological aspects. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  117. Anderson J 1983 The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  118. Newell A 1990 Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  119. Maudlin T 1989 Computation and consciousness. The Journal of Philosophy 86(8): 407

    Google Scholar 

  120. Sprevak M 2007 Chinese rooms and program portability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58(4): 755

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  121. Pylyshyn Z W 1984 Computation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  122. Hinton G E 2005 Computation by neural networks. Nature Neuroscience 3: 1170

    Google Scholar 

  123. Olshausen B A and Field D J 1997 Sparse coding with an over complete basis set: a strategy employed by v1?, Vision Research, Elsevier 37(23): 3311–3325

    Google Scholar 

  124. Rao R P N and Ballard D H 1999 Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive field effects. Nature Neuroscience 2: 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  125. James W 1890 The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  126. Popper K, Lindahl B I B and Århem P 1993 A discussion of the mind–brain problem. Theoretical Medicine 14: 167–180

    Google Scholar 

  127. Lindahl B I B and Århem P 1994 Mind as a force field: comments on a new interactionistic hypothesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 171: 111–122

    Google Scholar 

  128. Delbrück M 1986 Mind from matter? Palo Alto, CA: Blackwell Scientific Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  129. Penrose R 1989 The emperor’s new mind. GB: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  130. Penrose R 1994 Shadows of the mind. GB: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  131. Good I J 1965 Speculations concerning the first ultra-intelligent machine. Advances in Computers 6: 31–88

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi (Patna Campus), Patna, India

    Subhash Chandra Pandey

Authors
  1. Subhash Chandra Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhash Chandra Pandey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pandey, S.C. Can artificially intelligent agents really be conscious?. Sādhanā 43, 110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0887-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0887-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation