Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing the effect of reinforcement, particle size and aging on impact strength for Al 6061-red mud composite using Taguchi technique

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aluminium 6061-red mud composite has been successfully casted by using stir casting. Fairly uniform distribution of red mud reinforcement has been observed by SEM micrographs. The presence of red mud particles inside the matrix has been confirmed by energy dispersive spectroscopy. Impact testing has been done on impact testing machine with a range of 1–300 J (Charpy), 1–175 (Izod) and least count of 0.5 J. Impact strength shows a decreasing trend with increase in percentage reinforcement, aging time and is increased with increase in particle size. ANOVA analysis found that the effect of particle size and aging time are significant but the effect of percentage reinforcement has not been found significant. From the analysis, it can be observed that the particle size influences the impact strength most followed by aging time and percentage reinforcement. Optimum value of impact strength has been predicted by using Taguchi technique and confirmed experimentally by confirmation experiment results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jebeen Moses J, Dinaharan I and Joseph Sekher S 2016 Prediction of influence of process parameters on tensile strength of AA6061/TiC aluminum matrix composites produced using stir casting. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 26: 1498–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahmoud T S, Mahmoud F H, Zakaria H M and Khalifa T A 2008 Effect of squeezing on porosity and wear behaviour of partially remelted A319/20 vol% SiCp metal matrix composites. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 222: 295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao R N, Das S and Krishna P V 2008 Experimental investigation on the influence of SiC particulate reinforcement in aluminium alloy composites. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 222: 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmadi I and Aghdam M M 2010 Analysis of micro-stresses in the SiC/Ti metal matrix composite using a truly local meshless method. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 224: 1567–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao R N and Murthy K M 2010 A mathematical model to evaluate wear depth of an aluminium alloy reinforced with a silicon carbide particle composite using finite element analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 224: 133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gomez L, Busquets-Mataix D, Amigo V and Salvador M D 2009 Analysis of boron carbide aluminum matrix composites. J. Compos. Mater. 43: 987–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mazahery Ali and Ostadshabani Mohsen 2011 Investigation on mechanical properties of nano-Al2O3-reinforced aluminium matrix composites. J. Compos. Mater. 45: 2579–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo E J, Yue H Y, Fei W D and Wang L P 2012 Tensile properties of ZnO- and ZnAl2O4-coated aluminum borate whiskers reinforced aluminium composites at elevated temperatures. J. Compos. Mater. 46: 1475–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li S, Sua Y, Zhu X, Jina H, Ouyanga Q and Zhanga D 2016 Enhanced mechanical behavior and fabrication of silicon carbide particles covered by in-situ carbon nanotube reinforced 6061 aluminum matrix composites. Mater. Des. 107: 130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang S, Wang Y, Li C, Chi Q and Fei Z 2007 The dry sliding wear behavior of interpenetrating titanium trialuminide/aluminium composites. Appl. Compos. Mater. 14: 129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Uthayakumar M, Aravindan S and Rajkumar K 2013 Wear performance of Al–SiC–B4C hybrid composites under dry sliding conditions. Mater. Des. 47: 456–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahraeinejad S, Izadi H, Haghshenas M and Gerlich A P 2015 Fabrication of metal matrix composites by friction stir processing with different Particles and processing parameters. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 626: 505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh J and Chauhan A 2016 Characterization of hybrid aluminum matrix composites for advanced applications—a review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 5(2): 159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alaneme K K, Adewale T M and Olubambi P A 2014 Corrosion and wear behaviour of Al–Mg–Si alloy matrix hybrid composites reinforced with rice husk ash and silicon carbide. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 3(1): 9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibrahim M F, Ammar H R, Alkahtani S A and Samuel F H 2016 Metallographic investigation of tensile- and impact-tested aluminum composites. J. Compos. Mater. 50(20): 2793–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahmoud T S 2008 Tribological behaviour of A390/Grp metal-matrix composites fabricated using a combination of rheocasting and squeeze casting techniques. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 222: 257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahesh V P, Nair P S, Rajan T P D, Pai B C and Hubli R C 2011 Processing of surface-treated boron carbide-reinforced aluminum matrix composites by liquid–metal stir-casting technique. J. Compos. Mater. 45(23): 2371–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao V R, Ramanaiah N and Sarcar M M M 2016 Mechanical and tribological properties of AA7075–TiC metal matrix composites under heat treated (T6) and cast conditions. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 5(4): 377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mistry J M and Gohil P P 2017 An overview of diversified reinforcement on aluminum metal matrix composites: tribological aspects. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 231: 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma P, Khandujaa D and Sharma S 2016 Dry sliding wear investigation of Al6082/Gr metal matrix composites by response surface methodology. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 5: 29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bodunrin M O, Alaneme K K and Chown L H 2015 Aluminium matrix hybrid composites: a review of reinforcement philosophies; mechanical, corrosion and tribological characteristics. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 4: 434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. García-Romero A M, Egizabal P and Irisarri A M 2010 Fracture and fatigue behaviour of aluminium matrix composite automotive pistons. Appl. Compos. Mater. 17: 15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prakash K S, Kanagaraj A and Gopal P M 2015 Dry sliding wear characterization of Al 6061/rock dust composite. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 25: 3893−3903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dharmalingam S, Subramanian R and Kok M 2014 Optimization of abrasive wear performance in aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites using Taguchi–grey relational analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribo. 227: 749–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ross P J 1996 Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ozden S, Ekici R and Nair F 2007 Investigation of impact behaviour of aluminium based SiC particle reinforced metal-matrix composites. Compos. Part A. 38: 484–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Science and Engineering Research Board, New Delhi (India) for funding this research project through Fast Track Young Scientist Engineering Science Scheme vide their Letter No. SB/FTP/ETA-148/2013, Dated: 31/10/2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Chauhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panwar, N., Chauhan, A. Optimizing the effect of reinforcement, particle size and aging on impact strength for Al 6061-red mud composite using Taguchi technique. Sādhanā 43, 101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0870-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0870-6

Keywords

Navigation