Advertisement

Sādhanā

, 43:45 | Cite as

Trade-credit modeling for deteriorating item inventory system with preservation technology under random planning horizon

  • Dipana Jyoti Mohanty
  • Ravi Shankar Kumar
  • A Goswami
Article

Abstract

This paper deals with a stochastic deteriorating item inventory model with preservation technology and trade-credit finance. The planning horizon of many seasonal or fashionable items stochastically varies to some extent. On the other side, the demand of such items increases in initial phase followed by a constant. This type of demand pattern can be modeled as ramp-type demand. Deterioration of such products is a characteristic, which can be reduced by making the investment on latest equipment and technology. Consumption of such items within shelf life prevents to deterioration, which can be achieved by bulk sale. In order to stimulate the selling, trade-credit policy is also considered here. In these regards, this study examines the joint effect of preservation technology investment and trade-credit policy, wherein shortage is allowed and mixture of partial backlog and lost sales. Six cases may arise depending upon three parameters of time \(\mu \) (demand increases up to \(\mu \)), T (when on-hand inventory reaches to zero) and M (trade-credit period). The mathematical models are mainly categorized in two cases: (i) \(~\mu \le M\) and (ii) \(~\mu > M\). The model is illustrated through numerical experiments, sensitivity analysis, and graphical representation.

Keywords

Inventory stochastic review period deterioration preservation technology trade-credit policy partial backlogging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We express our gratefulness to the editor and the learned reviewers for their important and valuable remarks and proposals, which has led to a significant ameliorate in an earlier version of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Hill R M 1995 Inventory models for increasing demand followed by level demand. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 46(10): 1250–1259CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De A, Mamanduru V K R, Gunasekaran A, Subramanian N, and Tiwari M K 2016 Composite particle algorithm for sustainable integrated dynamic ship routing and scheduling optimization. Comput. Ind. Eng. 96: 201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De A, Kumar S K, Gunasekaran A and Tiwari M K 2017 Sustainable maritime inventory routing problem with time window constraints. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 61: 77–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giri B C, Jalan A K and Chaudhuri K S 2003 Economic order quantity model with Weibull deterioration distribution, shortage and ramp-type demand. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 34(4): 237–243MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manna S and Chaudhuri K S 2006 An EOQ model with ramp-type demand rate, time dependent deterioration rate, unit production cost and shortages. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171(2): 577–566CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deng P S, Lin Robert H J and Chu P 2007 A note on the inventory models for deteriorating items with ramp-type demand rate . Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(1): 112–120MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panda S, Senapati S and Basu M 2008 Optimal replenishment policy for perishable seasonal products in a season with ramp-type time dependent demand. Comput. Ind. Eng. 54(2): 301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skouri K, Konstantaras I, Papachristos S and Teng J-T 2011 Supply chain models for deteriorating products with ramp-type demand rate under permissible delay in payments. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(12): 14861–14869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar R S, De S K and Goswami A 2012 Fuzzy EOQ models with ramp-type demand rate, partial backlogging and time dependent deterioration rate. Int. J. Math. Oper. Res. 4(5): 473–502MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar R S, Tiwari M K and Goswami A 2016 Two-echelon fuzzy stochastic supply chain for the manufacturerbuyer integrated productioninventory system. J. Intell. Manuf. 27(4): 875–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar S and Singh A K 2016 Optimal time policy for deteriorating items of two-warehouse inventory system with time and stock dependent demand and partial backlogging. Sadhana 41(5): 541–548MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar S, Singh A K and Patel M K 2016 Optimization of Weibull deteriorating items inventory model under the effect of price and time dependent demand with partial backlogging. Sadhana 41(9): 977–984MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu J, Skouri K, Teng J-T and Hu Y 2016 Two inventory systems with trapezoidal-type demand rate and time-dependent deterioration and backlogging. Expert Syst. Appl. 46: 367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dye C-Y and Hsieh T-P 2012 An optimal replenishment policy for deteriorating items with effective investment in preservation technology. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218(1): 106–112MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ho J C, Solis A O and Chang Y-L 2007 An evaluation of lot-sizing heuristics for deteriorating inventory in material requirements planning systems. Comput. Oper. Res. 34(9): 2562–2575CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ouyang L-Y, Wu K-S and Yang C-T 2006 A study on an inventory model for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with permissible delay in payments. Comput. Ind. Eng. 51(4): 637–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hsu P H, Wee H M and Teng H M 2010 Preservation technology investment for deteriorating inventory. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 124(2): 388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zauberman G, Ronen R, Akerman M and Fuchs Y 1989 Low pH treatment protects litchi fruit color. Symp. Trop. Fruit Int. Trade 269: 309–314Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsao Y-C and Sheen G-J 2008 Dynamic pricing, promotion and replenishment policies for a deteriorating item under permissible delay in payments. Comput. Oper. Res. 35(11): 3562–3580CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Geetha K V and Uthayakumar R 2010 Economic design of an inventory policy for non-instantaneous deteriorating items under permissible delay in payments. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 233(10): 2492–2505MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee Y-P and Day C-Y 2012 An inventory model for deteriorating items under stock-dependent demand and controllable deterioration rate. Comput. Ind. Eng. 63(2): 474–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hsieh T-P and Dye C-Y 2013 A production-inventory model incorporating the effect of preservation technology investment when demand is fluctuating with time. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 239: 25–36MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dye C-Y 2013 The effect of preservation technology investment on a non-instantaneous deteriorating inventory model. Omega 41(5): 872–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mishra U, Cárdenas-Barrón L E, Tiwari S, Shaikh A A and Treviño-Garza G 2017 An inventory model under price and stock dependent demand for controllable deterioration rate with shortages and preservation technology investment. Ann. Oper. Res. 254(1–2): 165–190MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang J, Liu G, Zhang Q and Bai Z 2015 Coordinating a supply chain for deteriorating items with a revenue sharing and cooperative investment contract. Omega 56: 37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu G, Zhang J and Tang W 2015 Joint dynamic pricing and investment strategy for perishable foods with price-quality dependent demand. Ann. Oper. Res. 226(1): 397–416MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang J, Wei Q, Zhang Q and Tang W 2016 Pricing, service and preservation technology investments policy for deteriorating items under common resource constraints. Comput. Ind. Eng. 95: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goyal S K 1985 Economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 36(4): 335–338CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aggarwal P S and Jaggi K C 1995 Ordering policies of deteriorating items under permissible delay in payments. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 46(5): 658–662CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chang C-T, Ouyang L-Y and Teng J-T 2003 An EOQ model for deteriorating items under supplier credits linked to ordering quantity. Appl. Math. Model. 27(12): 983–996CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ouyang L-Y, Teng J-T, Goyal S K and Yang C-T 2009 An economic order quantity model for deteriorating items with partially permissible delay in payments linked to order quantity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 194(2): 418–431MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dye C-Y and Hsieh T-P 2013 A particle swarm optimization for solving lot-sizing problem with fluctuating demand and preservation technology cost under trade-credit. J. Glob. Optim. 55(3): 655–679MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang C-T, Dye C-Y and Ding J-F 2015 Optimal dynamic trade-credit and preservation technology allocation for a deteriorating inventory model. Comput. Ind. Eng. 87: 356–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen S-C and Teng J-T 2015 Inventory and credit decisions for time-varying deteriorating items with up-stream and down-stream trade-credit financing by discounted cash flow analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 243(2): 566–575MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tiwari S, Cárdenas-Barrón L E, Khanna A and Jaggi C K 2016 Impact of trade-credit and inflation on retailer’s ordering policies for non-instantaneous deteriorating items in a two-warehouse environment. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 176: 154–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tsao Y-C 2016 Joint location, inventory, and preservation decisions for non-instantaneous deterioration items under delay in payments. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 47(3): 572–585MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.National Institute of Technology AgartalaAgartalaIndia

Personalised recommendations