Advertisement

Sādhanā

, 43:21 | Cite as

Effectiveness of combinations of raft foundation with aprons as a protection measure against bridge pier scour

  • B A Vijayasree
  • T I Eldho
  • B S Mazumder
  • B V S Viswanadham
Article
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

Scour around bridge pier is the main reason for the failure of bridges. The local scour around the pier causes exposure of the foundation and may lead to undermining of the structure. Different types of protection measures such as the provision of raft, apron, sheet piles, etc. can be used as scour protection measures. One of the possible effective bridge scour protection measures is to provide a raft foundation with cut-off walls and provision of flexible stone aprons towards upstream (u/s) and downstream (d/s) sides of the pier. In this study, the effectiveness of various bridge pier scour protection measures using raft and aprons is investigated through hydraulic model studies in the laboratory. The results are compared for various cases, such as a simple pier, pier with raft and extended raft, pier resting on a raft with stone aprons at u/s and d/s of the raft and pier resting on an extended raft with stone aprons on u/s and d/s of it. The comparison of various cases showed that rigid raft with stone aprons on u/s and d/s and extended raft with apron are found to be more effective in reducing immediate scour beyond the rigid raft, thereby giving protection to the bridge piers.

Keywords

Scour pier raft foundation stone aprons scour protection physical model study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MORTH) for sponsoring the project titled “Hydraulic Model Investigations for Design of Raft Foundations for Bridges (B-40)” and the Director General, Chief Engineer, Superintending Engineer and Executive Engineer for co-coordinating the project. We express our sincere gratitude to Shri P L Bongirwar, Former Secretary, Maharashtra PWD, and Late Prof. U C Kothyari, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, for all the suggestions, help and support provided during the initial stages of this study. We are also thankful to the former and present engineers of Maharashtra PWD (Shri R.R Chonkar, Shri J. T. Nashikkar, Smt. Sanjivani Nigade Saha and others) and the staff of Hydraulics laboratory, IIT Bombay, for their untiring support and help rendered during model preparation and testing.

Funding

Funding was provided by Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MORTH) , New Delhi (Grant No. 09MORTH001).

References

  1. 1.
    Chiew Y and Melville B M 1987 Local scour around bridge piers. J. Hydraul. Res. 25(1): 15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kothyari U, Garde R J and RangaRaju K G 1992 Temporal variation of scour around circular bridge piers. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 118(8): 1091–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melville B W and Chiew Y M 1999 Time scale for local scour at bridge piers. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 125(1): 59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clopper P E, Lagasse P F and Zevenbergen L W 2007 Bridge pier scour countermeasures. In: Proceedings of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 1–13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Korkut R, Martinez E J, Morales R, Ettema R and Barkdoll B 2007 Geobag performance as scour countermeasure for bridge abutments. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 133(4): 431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tabarestani M K and Zarrati A R 2013 Design of stable riprap around aligned and skewed rectangular bridge piers. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 139(8): 911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoon T H and Kim D H 2001 Bridge pier scour protection by sack gabions. In: Bridging the Gap: Meeting the World's Water and Environmental Resources Challenges, pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gris R B 2010 Sheath for reducing local scour in bridge piers. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Scour and Erosion 2010 (ICSE-5), pp. 987–996Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heidarpour M, Afzalimehr H and Izadinia E 2010 Reduction of local scour around bridge pier groups using collars. Int. J. Sedim. Res. 25(4): 411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Izadinia E and Heidarpour M 2012 Simultaneous use of cable and collar to prevent local scouring around bridge pier. Int. J. Sedim. Res. 27(3): 394–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Masjedi A, Shafael B M and Esfandi A 2010 Experimental study on local scour around single oblong pier fitted with a collar in a 180 degree flume bend. Int. J. Sedim. Res. 25(3): 304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang H W, Ding B, Chiew Y M and Fang S L 2009 Protection of bridge piers against scouring with tetrahedral frames. Int. J. Sedim. Res. 24(4): 385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang C Y, Cheng J H, Shih H P and Chang J W 2011 Ring columns as pier scour countermeasures. Int. J. Sedim. Res. 26(3): 353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gaudio R, Tafarojnoruz A and Calomino F 2012 Combined flow-altering countermeasures against bridge pier scour. J. Hydraul. Res. 50(1): 35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    IRC 78-2000 Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges. New Delhi: The Indian Roads CongressGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    IRC 89-1997 Guidelines for design and construction of river training and control works for road bridges. New Delhi: The Indian Roads CongressGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mashahir M, Zarrati A and Mokallaf E 2010 Application of riprap and collar to prevent scouring around rectangular bridge piers. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 136(3): 183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zarrati A R, Chamani M R, Shafaie A and Latifi M 2010 Scour countermeasures for cylindrical piers using riprap and combination of collar and riprap. Int. J. Sedim. Res. 25(3): 313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chiew Y 1992 Scour protection at bridge piers. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 118(9): 1260–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chiew Y 1995 Mechanics of riprap failure at bridge piers. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 121(9): 635–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chiew Y M and Lim F H 2000 Failure behavior of riprap layer at bridge piers under live-bed conditions. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 126(1): 43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dey S and Sen D 2005 Determination of scour depth (for general bed, within channel contractions and at bridge piers) in boulder bed rivers under high stream velocities. Research and Development Scheme No. B-33, Final Report to Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Standards and Research (Bridges), Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kothyari U C 2007 Indian practice on estimation of scour around bridge piers—a comment. Sadhana 32(pt3): 187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ugalmugle A and Namjoshi A G 2004 Construction of raft foundation in deep sandy beds for major bridges across perennial rivers. J. Indian Roads Cong. (Paper No. 506): 422–461Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Borge V B and Jangde K S 2005 Innovative bridge foundations in weak soils—experiments and practice in Maharashtra. J. Indian Roads Cong. (Paper No. 518): 455–484Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Subramanya K 2012 Flow in open channels. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill EducationGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Streeter V L and Wylie E 1975 Fluid mechanics. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill EducationzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Head K 2006 Manual of soil laboratory testing. Dunbeath: Whittles PublishingGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eldho T I, Viswanadham B V S and Vijayasree B A 2010 Physical model study of scouring effects on pier foundation of bridges. In: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference 2010, GEOtrendz, IIT Bombay, India, pp. 973–976Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eldho T I, Viswanadham B V S and Vijayasree B A 2012 Physical model studies on extended raft foundation of bridges as a scour protection measure. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Hydraulics, Water Resources, Coastal and Environmental Engineering (HYDRO—2012), IIT Bombay, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eldho T I, Viswanadham B V S, Vijayasree B A and Siva Naga Venkat N 2011 Physical model study of scouring effects on rafty foundation of bridge piers. In: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference 2011, Kochi, India, pp. 907–910Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vijayasree B A, Eldho T I and Viswanadham B V S 2013 Physical model studies on bridge piers with raft foundation and aprons as a scour protection measure. In: Proceedings of HYDRO 2013 International, IIT Madras, IndiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • B A Vijayasree
    • 1
  • T I Eldho
    • 1
  • B S Mazumder
    • 1
  • B V S Viswanadham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations