Abstract
This paper presents the experimental investigations carried out on hand lay-up prototype multicellular glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite bridge deck panels under static and fatigue loading. Various sustainability aspects with regard to GFRP structural members were discussed. The aspects include (i) social development; (ii) environmental protection; and (iii) economic development. The GFRP material properties were evaluated by using (i) micromechanics; (ii) simplified composite micromechanics equations (Chamis); (iii) carpet plots; and (iv) equations proposed by Tsai–Hahn. GFRP members with various cross sections were tested to decide the better performance under flexural loading and found that GFRP with hollow section performs better. For the optimised cross-section dimensions, six multi-cellular GFRP composite bridge deck panels of size 1250 mm × 333 mm × 150 mm (l × b × d) were fabricated by hand lay-up process and tested for static and fatigue loading. It was observed from the experiment that during testing the bridge deck panel, no load shedding was observed even though the resin started cracking. At ultimate load, there was a loud cracking sound and the specimen load shedding occurred suddenly. Factor of safety for load and deflection was computed. From the fatigue experiments, it is observed that the percentage reduction in stiffness is approximately 12% for 500,000 cycles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) 2000 Standard specifications for design of highway bridge. Washington, DC, USA
ACI-440 2008 Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures, American Concrete Institute (ACI), Committee 440, Michigan, USA
CAN/CSA-S6-00 2005 Canadian highway bridge design code, Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, pp. 706
El-Salakawy E F, Benmokrane B, El-Ragaby A and Nadeau D 2005 Field investigation on the first bridge deck slab reinforced with glass FRP bars constructed in Canada. J. Compos. Construct. ASCE 9(6): 470–479
Shenton H W and Chajes M J 1999 Long-term health monitoring of an advanced polymer composite bridge. In: Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering 3671: 143–151
Turner M K, Harries K A, Petrou M F and Rizos D 2004 In situ structural evaluation of a GFRP bridge deck system. Compos. Struct. 65(2): 157–165
Alagusundaramoorthy P and VeeraSudarsana Reddy R 2008 Testing and evaluation of GFRP composite deck panels. Ocean Eng. 35(3–4): 287–293
Vovesnýa M and Rottera T 2012 GFRP bridge deck panel. Proced. Eng. 40: 492–497
Zhu J and Lopez M M 2014 Performance of a lightweight GFRP composite bridge deck in positive and negative bending regions. Compos. Struct. 113: 108–117
Valbona Mara, Reza Haghani and Peter Harryson 2014 Bridge decks of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP): a sustainable solution. Construct. Build. Mater. 50: 190–199
Francesco Ascione, Geminiano Mancusi, Saverio Spadea, Marco Lamberti, Fréderic Lebon and Aurélien Maurel-Pantel 2015 On the flexural behaviour of GFRP beams obtained by bonding simple panels: an experimental investigation. Compos. Struct. 131: 55–65
Thodesen C C, Krigsvoll G, Nilssen K and Bridget O Brien Thodesen 2012 Comparative analysis of best practices: review of existing methods and development of an indicator suite for pantura goals. Pantura, SINTEF, Norway
Knippers Jan, Pelke Eberhard, Gabler Markus and Berger Dieter 2010 Bridges with glass fibre-reinforced polymer decks: the road bridge in Friedberg, Germany. Struct. Eng.Int. J. – International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineers (IABSE) 20(4): 400–404
Lee S W, Hong K J and Kim J I 2008 Use of promising composite ‘Delta Deck’ for various composite deck bridges. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering (CICE2008), Zurich, Switzerland
Sams M 2005 Broadway bridge case study: bridge deck application of fiber reinforced polymer. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC
Hammond G and Jones C 2008 Inventory of carbon and energy (ICE), version 1.6a, University of Bath
Suzuki T and Takahashi J 2005 Prediction of energy intensity of carbon fiber reinforced plastics for mass-produced passenger cars. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Japan International SAMPE, symposium
Daniel R A 2010 A composite bridge is favoured by quantifying ecological impact. Struct. Eng.Int. J.—International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineers (IABSE) 20(4): 385–391
Resins B D D C et al. 2009 LCA COMPOSIETBRUG Eindrapport (2e versie) VERTROUWELIJK, BECO Groep, Vestiging Rotterdam, mei 2009
Zhang C, Amaduddin M and Canning L 2011 Carbon dioxide evaluation in a typical bridge deck replacement project. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Energy. 164(4): 183–194
Ehlen M A 1999 Life-cycle costs of fiber-reinforced-polymer bridge decks. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 11(3): 224–230
Sahirman S, Creese R C and Ganga Rao H V S 2008 FRP bridge deck life cycle cost analyzer. In: Proceedings of the International symposium on Life Cylce Civil Engineering, Varenna, Lake Como, Italy
Nystrom H E, Watkins S E, Antonio Nanni P E and Murray S P E 2003 Financial viability of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bridges. J. Manag. Eng. 19(1): 2–8
Design Data 1990 Fibre glass reinforced plastics. FGP Limited, Mumbai
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MUTHURAJ, M.P., NITHYAPRIYA, K. Experimental studies on multicellular GFRP bridge deck panels under static and fatigue loading. Sādhanā 42, 2171–2181 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0747-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0747-0