Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of vortex formation on sediment transport at dual pipe intakes

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vortex formation and subsequent sediment transport into the intake due to sea water withdrawal is one of the problems in coastal engineering. The effect of vortex formation on rate of sediment transport at coastal dual pipe intakes was investigated using a scaled physical model. Experiments were performed on dual pipe intakes at three common intake withdrawal directions (vertical, horizontal and with angle of 45°). In each experiment, the class of vortex with respect to its strength was determined. Particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) was employed to measure tangential velocity of vortices. Results indicated that the rate of sediment transport was considerably affected by the strength of formed vortices. The rate of transported sediment was increased by increasing the strength of formed vortex. Moreover, amount of sediment transport was affected by angle of pipe intakes. It could be concluded that the minimum and maximum rates of sediment transport occur for inclined and horizontal intakes, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zheng Y and Alsaffar A 2000 Water intake sediment problems in thermal power plants. ASCE 68(4): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Knauss J 1987 Swirling flow problems at intakes. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amiri S M, Zarrati A R, Roshan R and Sarkardeh H 2011 Surface vortex prevention at power intakes by horizontal plates. J. Water. Manag. (ICE) 164(4): 193–200

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kundu P 1990 Fluid mechanics. London: Academic Press.

  5. Sarkardeh H, Zarrati A R and Roshan R 2010 Effect of intake head wall and trash rack on vortices. J. Hydraul. Res. 48(1): 108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carriveau R, Kopp G A and Baddour R 2009 Free-surface stretching-sustained intake vortices. J. Hydraul. Res. 47(4): 486–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Z 2001 Sediment transport. Aalborg: Aalborg University.

  8. Anwar H O and Amphlett M B 1980 Vortices at vertically inverted intakes. J. Hydraul. Res. 18(2): 123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anwar H O, Weller J A and Amphlett M B 1978 Similarity of free vortex at horizontal intake. J. Hydraul. Res. 16(2): 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berge J -P 1966 A study of vortex formation and other abnormal flow in a tank with and without a free surface. La Houille Blanche 1: 13–40

  11. Chang E 1977 Review of literature on drain vortices in cylindrical tanks. Secondary Review of literature on drain vortices in cylindrical tanks. U.K, BHRA Report

  12. Daggett L L and Keulegan G H 1974 Similitude in free-surface vortex formation. ASCE J. Hydraul. Div. 100(1): 1565–1580

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hite J E and Mih W 1994 Velocity of air-core vortices at hydraulic intakes. J. Hydraul. Eng. 120(3): 284–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain A K, Ranga Raju K G and Garde R J 1987 Vortex formation at vertical pipe intakes. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 104(10): 1429–1448

    Google Scholar 

  15. Odgaard J A 1986 Free-surface air core vortex. J. Hydraul. Eng. 112(7): 610–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy Y R and Pickford J A 1972 Vortices at intakes in conventional sumps. Waterpower 108–109

  17. Sarkardeh H, Zarrati A R, Jabbari E and Roshan R 2012 Discussion of prediction of intake vortex risk by nearest neighbors modeling. J. Energy Eng. ASCE 137(6): 701–705

    Google Scholar 

  18. Denny D F and Young G H J 1957 The prevention of vortices and swirl at intakes. Secondary The Prevention of Vortices and Swirl at Intakes. Lissabon. Paper C1

  19. Jansen R B 1988 Advanced dam engineering for design, construction, and rehabilitation. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

  20. Yildirim N, Taştan K and Arsalan M M 2009 Critical submerged depth for dual pipe intakes. J. Hydraul. Res. 47(2): 242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yildirim N, Eyüpoğlu A S and Taştan K 2012 Critical submerged depth for dual rectangular intakes. J. Energy Eng. 138(4): 237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kerssens P M and Van Urk A 1986 Experimental studies on sedimentation due to water withdrawal. J. Hydraul. Eng. 112(7): 641–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson P L 1988 Hydro-power intake design considerations. J. Hydraul. Eng. 114(6): 651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Michell F, Ettema R and Muste M 2006 Sediment control at water intake for large thermal-power station on a small river. J. Hydraul. Eng. 132(5): 440–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moghadam M K, Bajestan M S and Sedghi H 2010 Sediment entry investigation at the 30 degree water intake installed at a trapezoidal channel. World Appl. Sci. J. 11(1): 82–88

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raudkivi A J 1993 Sedimentation: Exclusion and removal of sediment from diverted water. New York: Taylor & Francis.

  27. Padmanabhan M and Hecker G E 1984 Scale effects in pump sump models. J. Hydraul. Eng. 110(11): 1540–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Orton P M and Kineke G C 2011 Comparing calculated and observed vertical suspended-sediment distributions from a hudson river estuary turbidity maximum. Estuar. Coastal Shelf Sci. 52(3): 401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McAnally W H and Mehta A J 2009 Coastal zone and estuaries. Encyclopedia of life support systems. F. I. Islaay: Eolss Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nowell A R M 1983 The benthic boundary layer and sediment transport. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 21: 1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rankine W J M 1858 Manual of applied mechanics. London: C. Griffen Co.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Rahimzadeh.

List of symbols

D

diameter of pipe intake (m)

D

particle diameter (m)

Fr

Froude number

Fr s

sediment Froude number

G

gravity (m/s2)

K

Von Kármán constant

N Γ

circulation number

Q i

intake discharge (lit/s)

Q s

rate of sediment transport (cm3/s)

Re

Reynolds number

S

submerged depth (m)

S c

critical submerged depth (m)

SG

specific gravity

S/D

non-dimensional submerged depth

\( u^{ * } \)

shear velocity (m/s)

\( V_{\theta } \)

tangential velocity (m/s)

w

particle falling velocity (m/s)

We

Weber number

\( \beta \)

ratio of particle distribution coefficient to momentum coefficient

\( \varGamma \)

vortex strength (m2/s)

\( \gamma_{s} \)

specific weight of sediment (N/m3)

\( \gamma_{f} \)

specific weight of fluid (N/m3)

\( \mu \)

viscosity (kg/m.s)

\( \rho \)

density of fluid (kg/m3)

\( \upsilon \)

kinematic viscosity (kg/s.m)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khanarmuei, M.R., Rahimzadeh, H., Kakuei, A.R. et al. Effect of vortex formation on sediment transport at dual pipe intakes. Sādhanā 41, 1055–1061 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0531-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0531-6

Keywords

Navigation